Literature DB >> 2910214

The need for definitive therapy in the management of perforated gastric ulcers. Review of 202 cases.

R M Hodnett1, F Gonzalez, W C Lee, F C Nance, R Deboisblanc.   

Abstract

A retrospective study of 202 patients who presented to three Louisiana hospitals with perforated gastric ulcers was performed. Patients were treated surgically, medically, or were not treated. Only those patients with gastric ulcers were included in the study, not those with "channel ulcers" or peptic ulcers. The mortality rate of the 185 patients who were treated with operation was 18%. Of those patients treated nonoperatively, the mortality was 95% (one survivor). There was a definite difference in mortality among those patients treated with definitive operative procedures (11.3%) versus those patients treated with nondefinitive surgery (22.9%). This difference was consistent even in the presence of purulent exudate in the abdominal cavity and among those patients presenting in shock. The mortality among those patients who presented with a initial blood pressure of 90 mmHg or less were defined as being in shock, and the mortality in this subgroup was 52.8%. The mortality among those patients who had purulent fluid within the abdominal cavity was about the same, regardless of type of surgical procedure. The patients who underwent nondefinitive procedures required subsequent operative treatment in 25.7% of cases. Also noted was the lack of correlation between symptoms of ulcer disease and perforation. Those patients treated with definitive surgery (57%) and those treated with nondefinitive surgery (41%) reported no symptoms consistent with ulcer disease before operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2910214      PMCID: PMC1493882          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198901000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  12 in total

1.  Gastrectomy in acute gastroduodenal perforation: analysis of 112 cases.

Authors:  D A COOLEY; G L JORDAN; H L BROCKMAN; M E DEBAKEY
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1955-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Guest lecture: the nonsurgical treatment of perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  H TAYLOR
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1957-09       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Immediate subtotal gastrectomy for acute perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  H AUCHINCLOSS
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1952-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Factors influencing prognosis in perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  J M McDonough; J H Foster
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Perforation of gastroduodenal ulcer.

Authors:  E D Palmer
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1972-12

6.  Perforated gastroduodenal ulcer disease at the Massachusetts General Hospital from 1952 to 1970.

Authors:  G A Donaldson; F Jarrett
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Treatment and mortality of perforated peptic ulcer: a survey of 852 cases.

Authors:  M M Cohen
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1971-08-07       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Perforated gastroduodenal ulcers. Factors affecting morbidity and mortality and the role of definitive surgery.

Authors:  T Coutsoftides; H S Himal
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Reassessment of Graham-Steele closure in acute perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  M E Fallat; M J White; J D Richardson; L M Flint
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 0.954

10.  A prospective study of operative risk factors in perforated duodenal ulcers.

Authors:  J Boey; J Wong; G B Ong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  9 in total

1.  Significant factors associated with fatal outcome in emergency open surgery for perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Mario Testini; Piero Portincasa; Giuseppe Piccinni; Germana Lissidini; Fabio Pellegrini; Luigi Greco
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Treatment for perforated gastric ulcer: a multi-institutional retrospective review.

Authors:  Ryo Tanaka; Shin-ichi Kosugi; Kaoru Sakamoto; Kazuhito Yajima; Takashi Ishikawa; Tatsuo Kanda; Toshifumi Wakai
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Non-traumatic colon perforation in children: a 10-year review.

Authors:  Y J Chang; D C Yan; M S Kong; H C Chao; C S Huang; J Y Lai
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 4.  Perforated peptic ulcer - an update.

Authors:  Kin Tong Chung; Vishalkumar G Shelat
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-01-27

5.  Mortality in perforated duodenal ulcer depends upon pre-operative risk: a retrospective 10-year study.

Authors:  J O Larkin; M G Bourke; A Muhammed; R Waldron; K Barry; P W Eustace
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  The surgical management of complicated peptic ulcer disease: An EAST video presentation.

Authors:  Aaron Hudnall; James M Bardes; Kennith Coleman; Conley Stout; Daniel Regier; Stephen Balise; David Borgstrom; Daniel Grabo
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.697

7.  Peritonitis - the Eastern experience.

Authors:  Sanjay Gupta; Robin Kaushik
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 8.  Surgical Scales: Primary Closure versus Gastric Resection for Perforated Gastric Ulcer - A Surgical Debate.

Authors:  Mahir Gachabayov; Valentin Babyshin; Oleg Durymanov; Dmitriy Neronov
Journal:  Niger J Surg       Date:  2017 Jan-Jun

9.  Omental patch repair of large perforated peptic ulcers ≥25 mm is associated with higher leak rate.

Authors:  Yi Liang Wang; Xue Wei Chan; Kai Siang Chan; Vishal G Shelat
Journal:  J Clin Transl Res       Date:  2021-11-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.