Literature DB >> 29102074

Long-Term Survival of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Implants From Different Manufacturers.

James W Taylor1, Chris Frampton1, Alastair G Rothwell1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be performed using either femoral and acetabular components provided by the same manufacturer (matched components) or components from different manufacturers (unmatched components). We hypothesized that there would be no difference in outcomes following the use of unmatched compared to matched components.
METHODS: Data from a nationwide joint registry, the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR), were analyzed to assess long-term outcomes of using unmatched implants in THA.
RESULTS: The NZJR has recorded a total of 108,613 primary THAs. We excluded combinations with less than 50 implantations, leaving 99,732 arthroplasties (90.5%). The unmatched group consisted of 24,537 (24.6%) THAs. Revision procedures were required in 3434 (4.6%) of the matched group, at a rate of 0.72/100 component years and 1078 (4.4%) of the unmatched group, a rate of 0.69/100 component years (P = .049). THAs with metal-on-metal or ceramic-on-metal bearings were overrepresented in the matched group. When analysis was repeated with these implants excluded, there was no longer a difference in revision rate between groups (4.0% revisions, 0.65/100 component years and 4.3% revisions, 0.67/100 component years [P = .742]). Survival analysis showed 17-year survival for matched components and unmatched to be within 95% confidence intervals at all time points. There was a small, statistically significant improvement in Oxford Hip Scores for the unmatched group compared with the matched group.
CONCLUSION: Data from the NZJR confirm that the use of unmatched components in THA has no adverse effect on outcomes.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthroplasty; hip; implants; registry; survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29102074     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  3 in total

1.  Ten-year comparison of two different techniques for femoral bone cavity preparation-broaching versus compaction in patients with cementless total hip arthroplasty : a randomized radiostereometric study of 30 total hip arthroplasties in 15 patients operated bilaterally.

Authors:  Maciej Okowinski; Mette Holm Hjorth; Sebastian Breddam Mosegaard; Jonathan Hugo Jürgens-Lahnstein; Stig Storgaard Jakobsen; Poul Hedevang Christensen; Søren Kold; Maiken Stilling
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2021-12

Review 2.  EFORT recommendations for off-label use, mix & match and mismatch in hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Keith Tucker; Klaus-Peter Günther; Per Kjaersgaard-Andersen; Jörg Lützner; Jan Philippe Kretzer; Rob G H H Nelissen; Toni Lange; Luigi Zagra
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-11-19

3.  To mix or not to mix? Medicolegal implications of mixed components in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rinne M Peters; Jantina T Hiemstra; Wierd P Zijlstra; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Martin Stevens
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.717

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.