Literature DB >> 29101521

Impact of transducer frequency setting on speckle tracking measures.

Flemming Javier Olsen1, Jesper Hastrup Svendsen2,3, Lars Køber2,3, Søren Højberg4, Ketil Haugan5, Jan Skov Jensen6,3, Tor Biering-Sørensen6.   

Abstract

Speckle tracking echocardiography is an emerging technique, which is currently being included in clinical guidelines. We sought to investigate the impact of transducer frequency settings on speckle tracking derived measures. The study comprised of 22 subjects prospectively enrolled for a randomized controlled trial (LOOP-study, Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT02036450). Patients were above 70 years of age with increased risk of stroke, and had an echocardiogram performed, which included focused images of the left ventricle. Focused images were obtained with the transducer frequency set at both 1.7/3.3 and 1.5/3.0 MHz. The images were obtained immediately after each other at the exact same position for the two settings. Speckle tracking was performed in three apical projections, allowing for acquisition of layered global longitudinal strain (GLS) and strain rate measures. Concordance between the frequency settings was tested for endo-, mid-, and epicardial GLS and strain rates by coefficients of variation, bias coefficients and visually displayed by Bland-Altman plots. Bland-Altman plots did not reveal any significant over- or underestimation of any speckle tracking measure. Bias coefficients showed that none of the measurements differed significantly between the two settings (bias for GLSendo = - 0.07 ± 2.94, p = 0.91; GLSmid = 0.02 ± 2.70, p = 0.98, GLSepi = 0.07 ± 2.53, p = 0.90). Coefficients of variation were as follows: GLSendo = 15.11%, GLSmid = 15.28%, GLSepi = 17.26%, systolic strain rate = 15.66%, early diastolic strain rate = 38.46%, late diastolic strain rate = 11%. Changing between transducer frequency settings does not systematically derange speckle tracking measures. One can safely reduce the transducer frequency without compromising the validity of speckle tracking derived measures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Echocardiography; Speckle tracking; Strain; Transducer frequency

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29101521     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-017-1254-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  12 in total

1.  Global Longitudinal Strain by Echocardiography Predicts Long-Term Risk of Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality in a Low-Risk General Population: The Copenhagen City Heart Study.

Authors:  Tor Biering-Sørensen; Sofie Reumert Biering-Sørensen; Flemming Javier Olsen; Morten Sengeløv; Peter Godsk Jørgensen; Rasmus Mogelvang; Amil M Shah; Jan Skov Jensen
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 7.792

2.  The influence of angle of insonation and target depth on speckle-tracking strain.

Authors:  Daniel Forsha; Niels Risum; Sudarshan Rajagopal; Stephen Dolgner; Christoph Hornik; Huiman Barnhart; Joseph Kisslo; Piers Barker
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 5.251

3.  Variability of global left ventricular deformation analysis using vendor dependent and independent two-dimensional speckle-tracking software in adults.

Authors:  Niels Risum; Sophia Ali; Niels T Olsen; Christian Jons; Michel G Khouri; Trine K Lauridsen; Zainab Samad; Eric J Velazquez; Peter Sogaard; Joseph Kisslo
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 5.251

4.  Expert consensus for multimodality imaging evaluation of adult patients during and after cancer therapy: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Plana; Maurizio Galderisi; Ana Barac; Michael S Ewer; Bonnie Ky; Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie; Javier Ganame; Igal A Sebag; Deborah A Agler; Luigi P Badano; Jose Banchs; Daniela Cardinale; Joseph Carver; Manuel Cerqueira; Jeanne M DeCara; Thor Edvardsen; Scott D Flamm; Thomas Force; Brian P Griffin; Guy Jerusalem; Jennifer E Liu; Andreia Magalhães; Thomas Marwick; Liza Y Sanchez; Rosa Sicari; Hector R Villarraga; Patrizio Lancellotti
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Optimal Acquisition Settings for Speckle Tracking Echocardiography-Derived Strains in Infants: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Umael Khan; Johannes Just Hjertaas; Gottfried Greve; Knut Matre
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Strain imaging in morbid obesity: insights into subclinical ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  Marcia M Barbosa; Alline M Beleigoli; Maria de Fatima Diniz; Cláudia V Freire; Antonio L Ribeiro; Maria Carmo P Nunes
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.882

7.  Atrial fibrillation detected by continuous electrocardiographic monitoring using implantable loop recorder to prevent stroke in individuals at risk (the LOOP study): Rationale and design of a large randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Søren Zöga Diederichsen; Ketil Jørgen Haugan; Lars Køber; Søren Højberg; Axel Brandes; Christian Kronborg; Claus Graff; Anders Gaarsdal Holst; Jonas Bille Nielsen; Derk Krieger; Jesper Hastrup Svendsen
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Layer-specific quantification of myocardial deformation by strain echocardiography may reveal significant CAD in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Sebastian I Sarvari; Kristina H Haugaa; Wasim Zahid; Bjørn Bendz; Svend Aakhus; Lars Aaberge; Thor Edvardsen
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-04-10

9.  Prognostic implications of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in heart failure patients with narrow QRS complex treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy: a subanalysis of the randomized EchoCRT trial.

Authors:  Jeroen J Bax; Victoria Delgado; Peter Sogaard; Jagmeet P Singh; William T Abraham; Jeffrey S Borer; Kenneth Dickstein; Daniel Gras; Josep Brugada; Michele Robertson; Ian Ford; Henry Krum; Johannes Holzmeister; Frank Ruschitzka; John Gorcsan
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 10.  Myocardial strain imaging: how useful is it in clinical decision making?

Authors:  Otto A Smiseth; Hans Torp; Anders Opdahl; Kristina H Haugaa; Stig Urheim
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of Temporal and Spatial Smoothing on Speckle-Tracking-Derived Strain in Neonates.

Authors:  Umael Khan; Tom R Omdal; Gottfried Greve; Ketil Grong; Knut Matre
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 1.655

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.