Literature DB >> 29101473

Tracking maize pollen development by the Leaf Collar Method.

Kevin Begcy1, Thomas Dresselhaus2.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: An easy and highly reproducible nondestructive method named the Leaf Collar Method is described to identify and characterize the different stages of pollen development in maize. In plants, many cellular events such as meiosis, asymmetric cell division, cell cycle regulation, cell fate determination, nucleus movement, vacuole formation, chromatin condensation and epigenetic modifications take place during pollen development. In maize, pollen development occurs in tassels that are confined within the internal stalk of the plant. Hence, identification of the different pollen developmental stages as a tool to investigate above biological processes is impossible without dissecting the entire plant. Therefore, an efficient and reproducible method is necessary to isolate homogeneous cell populations at individual stages throughout pollen development without destroying the plant. Here, we describe a method to identify the various stages of pollen development in maize. Using the Leaf Collar Method in the maize inbreed line B73, we have determined the duration of each stage from pollen mother cells before meiosis to mature tricellular pollen. Anther and tassel size as well as percentage of pollen stages were correlated with vegetative stages, which are easily recognized. The identification of stage-specific genes indicates the reproducibility of the method. In summary, we present an easy and highly reproducible nondestructive method to identify and characterize the different stages of pollen development in maize. This method now opens the way for many subsequent physiological, morphological and molecular analyses to study, for instance, transcriptomics, metabolomics, DNA methylation and chromatin patterns during normal and stressful conditions throughout pollen development in one of the economically most important grass species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Maize; Meiosis; Mitosis; Nondestructive method; Pollen development; Sperm cell

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29101473      PMCID: PMC5701949          DOI: 10.1007/s00497-017-0311-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Reprod        ISSN: 2194-7953            Impact factor:   3.767


Introduction

The dissection of male gametophyte (pollen) development provides a unique tool to study many fundamental questions in plant cell biology and reproduction. Moreover, microspores as one stage during pollen development represent the major source to generate di-haploid plants and thus are key to modern agriculture. The events that culminate in the formation and release of mature pollen grains from anthers initiate with the formation of diploid pollen mother cells followed by meiosis generating four microspores, which further develop into pollen grains harboring one and two haploid sperm, respectively, enclosed by the vegetative tube cell (Figure S1). Pollen development in anthers involves intricate and tightly controlled sets of structural and molecular changes and is characterized by a relatively synchronized gene expression pattern (Rutley and Twell 2015). Although the importance of knowing the precise developmental stages of crop plants has been recognized for many years (Leather 2010), stages of pollen development have been correlated with plant age rather than growth stages. Previous reports have also shown a correlation between anther length and pollen development (Chang and Neuffer 1989), but plants had to be dissected to isolate anthers. Thus, implementing an effective method of correlating vegetative plant development with pollen stages is fundamental for an accurate selection of material for gene expression analyses, comparative genomics and physiology, as well as investigations of pollen development under stress. Maize (Zea mays) has been proposed as a model to study reproductive development in grasses and monocots in general (Dresselhaus et al. 2011). Several cellular and genetic tools, including the availability of transposon insertion lines and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing, are available making maize plants an attractive organism to be studied. Within the extensive maize populations generated over the past centuries, B73 maize inbred line is one of the most widely used varieties and represents the line whose genome has been sequenced (Schnable et al. 2009) and which now serves as a maize reference genome. In conclusion, B73 provides an excellent tool for further genomic studies. The most accessible developmental stages of pollen are mature pollen grains and pollen tubes, and these are consequently the stages most extensively studied in various plant species (Rutley and Twell 2015). In contrast, only few studies have focused on the synchronized pollen developmental process (Bedinger and Edgerton 1990; Dukowic-Schulze et al. 2014; Ma et al. 2008), mainly due to difficulties of accurately determining pollen stages and sample collection. Maize pollen development occurs within the florets of the tassel, which is confined in the stalk. Therefore, studies involving developmental progression of reproductive structures become a difficult task due to sampling inaccessibility without destroying the plant. The emerging tassel is formed within the plant stem, which is surrounded by newly folded blades and sheaths that protect it (Bonnett 1954). This important peculiarity makes the precise monitoring of pollen development and access to the tassel particularly difficult without dissecting the entire plant. Thus, it is essential to identify an external vegetative trait that is accurate, reproducible and easily recognizable to monitor and isolate different stages of maize pollen development. Zadoks decimal code is the most frequently used external system to determine cereals development (Zadoks et al. 1974). In wheat, rice and barley, adaptations to the original scale have been carried out (Chin et al. 1991; Landes and Porter 1989; Tottman 1987; Zadoks et al. 1974). However, this popular staging method does not allow to accurately determine pollen development. In maize, the most widely used method to determine vegetative stages is the Leaf Collar Method. This method determines the leaf stage in maize by counting the number of leaves on a plant with visible leaf collars, beginning with the lowermost, short, rounded-tip true leaf and ending with the uppermost leaf with a visible leaf collar (Abendroth et al. 2011). The leaf collar is the light-colored collar-like band located at the base of an exposed leaf blade, near the spot where the leaf blade comes into contact with the stem of the plant and from where it extends away from the stalk (Fig. 1a).
Fig. 1

Maize development determined by the Leaf Collar Method. a Leaf collar structures on the base of maize leaves. b Developmental stages and their respective plant height of maize inbred line B73. c Vegetative developmental stages (V-stages) according to Abendroth et al. (2011) after days of planting. (*) Indicates significant differences relative to the previous developmental stage at P < 0.001. Dots plotted represent outliers of the interquartile range of the individual measurements. Error bars represent SD (n = 5 plants for each V-stage) in at least five independent experiments

Maize development determined by the Leaf Collar Method. a Leaf collar structures on the base of maize leaves. b Developmental stages and their respective plant height of maize inbred line B73. c Vegetative developmental stages (V-stages) according to Abendroth et al. (2011) after days of planting. (*) Indicates significant differences relative to the previous developmental stage at P < 0.001. Dots plotted represent outliers of the interquartile range of the individual measurements. Error bars represent SD (n = 5 plants for each V-stage) in at least five independent experiments We report here a nondestructive method to determine pollen development stages in maize. The method allows to precisely isolate large quantities of pollen for further studies. Moreover, since this pollen development prediction analysis is based upon easily defined growth characteristics or vegetative (V) stages, this method can also be easily adapted to other maize varieties and other growth conditions.

Materials and methods

Plant material and growth conditions

Seeds of the maize inbred line B73 were germinated in an incubator and then transferred to pots (10 cm diameter, 10 seedlings per pot) containing a substrate and soil mixture (1:1, v/v). Maize B73 seedlings were then transferred to 10-L pots to the greenhouse under controlled conditions of 14 h of light at 25 ± 2 °C and 10 h of darkness at 21 ± 2 °C and a constant air humidity of 60–65%. Supplemented light of 16,000 LUX was provided to adjust day length duration. An automated temperature-water-based irrigation system was used to supply water according to plant consumption in a time-based pre-programmed schedule. Plants were fertilized twice a week with 2% Hakaphos (Compo Expert) and monitored throughout their entire vegetative and reproductive development.

Leaf Collar Method

Vegetative (V) stages were determined by the total number of leaves with visible collars, for instance, plants with seven visible leaf collars are at V7. A collar structure is the off-white band at the base of the leaf blade where it extends away from the stalk. During plant development, an increase in plant size and number of leaves was observed; however, lower leaves are naturally damaged and lost. Therefore, it is important to count them since the beginning; otherwise, developmental stages will be misidentified, generating errors determining V-stages. Leaves within the whorl, not yet fully expanded and with no visible leaf collar are not included in this leaf staging method (Abendroth et al. 2011). After plants reached selected V-stages, plants were dissected and pollen development was monitored.

Male gametophyte isolation and visualization

Pollen grains isolated at individual V-stages were used to determine their male gametophyte stages. To determine developmental stages, pollen was mounted on glass slides containing 1 mg/mL DAPI solution in 1X PBS (0.8% NaCl; 0.002% KCl; 0.014% of Na2HPO4; 0.0024% of KH2PO4), covered with a cover slip, sealed and observed after 5 min in a Zeiss microscope equipped for structured illumination microscopy (Apotome) and with a Zeiss AxioCam MRm camera. DAPI was excited with a filter set of 359 nm. Images were recorded using AxioCam cameras (MrC; Zeiss). Approximately, 20–25 plants were used per pollen developmental stage identification. Isolation of pollen developmental stages was followed by the capillary collection of meiocytes methods already described in maize (Dukowic-Schulze et al. 2014).

RNA isolation and qPCR

Total pollen RNA was isolated using RNA plant mini kit (Ambion) following the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA synthesis was performed using reverse transcription system (Invitrogen SuperScript II) and oligo(dT) primers. Real-time PCR reactions were performed using KAPA SYBR Fast qPCR Master Mix (Peqlab Biotechnologie) as described by (Begcy and Walia 2015). Ubiquitin (GRMZM2G102471) was used as the internal normalization control. qPCRs were performed on the Mastercycler Realplex2 (Eppendorf) in a 96-well reaction plate according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The primers that have been used are described in Table S1. Cycling parameters consisted of 5 min at 95 °C, and 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 30 s and 70 °C for 30 s. qPCR reactions were performed in triplicate for each RNA sample on at least three biological replicates of every pollen developmental stage. Specificity of the amplifications was verified by a melting curve analysis to test product specificity. Results from the Mastercycler Realplex2 detection system were further analyzed using Microsoft Excel. Relative amounts of mRNA were calculated from threshold points (Ct values) located in the log-linear range of real-time PCR amplification plots using the 2-ΔCt method.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using the R software/environment. Data from at least five independent experiments, where each experiment had at least n = 5 for each V-stage (resulting in n = 25 per V-stage), were used. Data were expressed as mean, median, minimum value (min) and maximum value (max), and p value of 0.05 was used as the significance level.

Results and discussion

Variation of plant height and vegetative (V) stage transitions of maize plants staged by the Leaf Collar Method

Maize inbred line B73 was used to establish a correlation between vegetative stages and pollen development. One of the most widely used agronomical methods to characterize vegetative stages in maize is the Leaf Collar Method (Abendroth et al. 2011). The total number of leaves with visible leaf collars is used in this method as an indicator of vegetative (V) stages. While the Leaf Collar Method is used for the identification of vegetative stages, reproductive developmental stages are characterized based on visual indicators of flower and kernel development (Abendroth et al. 2011). Thus, it was unclear whether the Leaf Collar Method could also be used to provide appropriate categorization of early reproductive developmental stages. Therefore, we investigated whether the method could be used to accurately and reproducibly determine individual stages for maize pollen development. We first studied plant height, which is one of the most variable traits in maize. It is well known that maize plants cultivated at the same location with similar environmental conditions display variable plant height. The correlation between maize development and temperature is also well documented (Abendroth et al. 2011). Even though we observed statistical differences among discrete V-stages, a similar plant height can be found at different V-stages indicating an unpredictability when using plant height to determine V-stages (Fig. 1b). Additionally, although early V-stages correlated well with days after planting, stages after V6–V7, where male gametophyte development is initiated, showed a large overlap and variability (Fig. 1c). For instance, when comparing plants at the same day after planting they are encountered at different V-stages, indicating a low accuracy for pollen developmental stages prediction.

Tracking maize pollen developmental stages by the Leaf Collar Method

Previous reports have shown already a correlation between anther length and pollen development (Chang and Neuffer 1989). We specifically measured anthers and tassel size in correlation with pollen developmental stages collected following the Leaf Collar Method (Fig. 2a). We found that our staging method allows for reliable identification of pollen development based on anther and tassel size. Even though a positive correlation among anthers and tassel size and pollen development was found (Fig. 2b), the measurements showed high variations at all stages indicating a large overlap among different developmental stages, thus inducing a low accuracy for pollen stage prediction. Furthermore, since anthers and tassels grow inside of the stalk it is particularly difficult to identify the developmental stages without dissecting maize plants. In summary, > 90% of pollen isolated at stage V8 are PMCs, about 90% at stages V9–V10 are meiocytes, tetrads occur at around 80% at stages V11–V12 and > 90% unicellular microspores at stages V13–V14. We suggest to use stage V15 to isolate > 90% bicellular pollen und V17 to isolate exclusively mature pollen (Fig. 2c). Figure 2d, e shows examples of tetrads isolated at stage V12 and a mixture of uni- and bicellular pollen at stage V14. Even though this method can predict pollen stages with high accuracy (Fig. 2c), we observed that all stages contained a small portion (5–20%) of cells containing a second pollen stage. This is due to the fact that neighboring spikelets in general exhibit highly synchronous anther and pollen development in upper florets, while development in the lower florets is about 1 day delayed (Cacharron et al. 1999; Kiesselbach 1949).
Fig. 2

Pollen developmental stages of maize inbred line B73. a Stages in relation to anther, b tassel size and c vegetative development (V) stages. Average percentages of isolated/pooled cells of V-stages of maize pollen development are shown in (c). d Isolated tetrad stages at V12 stage; bar = 10 µm. e Pooled sample at the unicellular and bicellular stage isolated at V14 stage; bar = 50 µm. (*) Indicates significant differences relative to the previous developmental stage at P < 0.001. Dots plotted represent outliers of the interquartile range of the individual measurements. Error bars represent SD (n = 5 plants for each V-stage) in at least five independent experiments

Pollen developmental stages of maize inbred line B73. a Stages in relation to anther, b tassel size and c vegetative development (V) stages. Average percentages of isolated/pooled cells of V-stages of maize pollen development are shown in (c). d Isolated tetrad stages at V12 stage; bar = 10 µm. e Pooled sample at the unicellular and bicellular stage isolated at V14 stage; bar = 50 µm. (*) Indicates significant differences relative to the previous developmental stage at P < 0.001. Dots plotted represent outliers of the interquartile range of the individual measurements. Error bars represent SD (n = 5 plants for each V-stage) in at least five independent experiments Development of pollen grains (Fig. 3a) is initiated in the anthers located in the florets of a maize tassel. Four loculi in each anther contain large numbers of synchronously developing pollen. The initial step of pollen formation occurs with the development of free diploid pollen mother cells (PMCs), which predominately occurs at stage V8 (Fig. 3a and Fig. S1). Subsequent steps involve the maturation of PMCs into meiocytes (Fig. 3b), which undergo two meiotic divisions leading to the formation of tetrads (Fig. 3c) each containing four haploid microspores. This process takes place between late V8 and the beginning of V11. Next, unicellular pollen or microspores are released from tetrads and increase in size between stages V13 and V14 (Fig. 3d). Next, an asymmetric mitotic cell division (pollen mitosis I; PMI) occurs, giving rise to a small generative cell and a large vegetative cell surrounded by a thick, strongly sculptured cell wall. This stage occurring at stage V15 to early V16 is named as bicellular pollen (Fig. 3e). A subsequent second mitotic division (pollen mitosis II; PMII) of the generative cell generates two spindle-shaped sperm cells ultimately forming together with the tube cell the tricellular mature pollen grain (Fig. 3f). Mature pollen can be found after stage V17.
Fig. 3

Pollen development of the maize inbred line B73 tracked by the Leaf Collar Method. a Schematic representation of the progression of vegetative stages during maize pollen development and their respective pollen developmental stages. b–f Pollen stages as indicated. Bars = 10 µm

Pollen development of the maize inbred line B73 tracked by the Leaf Collar Method. a Schematic representation of the progression of vegetative stages during maize pollen development and their respective pollen developmental stages. b–f Pollen stages as indicated. Bars = 10 µm

Pollen stage-specific analysis of gene expression

To further validate the accuracy of the method reported, we selected a list of pollen-enriched candidate genes already reported in maize and rice (Dukowic-Schulze et al. 2014; Wu et al. 2014) as well as others found in our own RNAseq data from pollen (Begcy and Dresselhaus, unpublished). A total of 12 candidate genes were used to test their expression pattern during pollen development. Two genes described as particularly expressed during meiosis in maize were selected for the confirmation of the accurate isolation of meiocytes (Dukowic-Schulze et al. 2014), the genes of meiotic recombination protein Dmc1 (GRMZM2G109618) and Zyp1 (GRMZM2G143590), a central element of the synaptonemal complex. Transcript levels of Dmc1 and Zyp1 were specifically found in isolated meiocytes (Fig. 4a–b). At the tetrad and unicellular pollen stage, an expansin and a dehydrin gene were found to be preferentially expressed (Fig. 4c–d). An uncharacterized gene (GRMZM2G060937) and a plastocyanin-like gene (GRMZM2G121236) were highly expressed in unicellular pollen and switched off at the bicellular stage (Fig. 4e–f). Two uncharacterized genes (GRMZM2G504595 and GRMZM2G043460) showed particularly high expression in bicellular pollen (Fig. 4g–h). Glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (GRMZM6G477257) and another uncharacterized gene (GRMZM2G139431) were almost exclusively expressed in mature pollen (Fig. 4i–j). Two constitutively expressed genes encoding ubiquitin (GRMZM2G102471) and a 50S ribosomal protein L12 (GRMZM2G171501) are shown to be present at comparable levels in all pollen samples (Fig. 4k–l).
Fig. 4

Stage-specific expression of genes during pollen development in maize. a–b Expression of meiocytes genes as well as c–f genes preferentially expressed at tetrad/unicellular (microspore) stage, g–h bicellular and i–j mature tricellular pollen stage. k–l Ubiquitin and 50S ribosomal protein gene L12 are shown as examples of genes expressed throughout pollen development. Gene identifiers are provided for all example genes shown

Stage-specific expression of genes during pollen development in maize. a–b Expression of meiocytes genes as well as c–f genes preferentially expressed at tetrad/unicellular (microspore) stage, g–h bicellular and i–j mature tricellular pollen stage. k–l Ubiquitin and 50S ribosomal protein gene L12 are shown as examples of genes expressed throughout pollen development. Gene identifiers are provided for all example genes shown

Conclusions

Our investigations showed that plant height and age are not accurate measures to determine pollen developmental stages. As reported earlier, anther and tassel length and pollen development (Chang and Neuffer 1989) are strongly correlated. As a vegetative noninvasive measure, we could show that the Leaf Collar Method can be used as a tool for identifying very pure stages of pollen development in maize with high accuracy and without damaging the plants for stage determination. This method can now be widely applied to study, for instance, transcriptome, methylome and metabolome of the various pollen stages and for functional analyses of mutants. Pollen stages such as microspores can also be easily isolated at large quantities for breeding purposes such as haploid production. Small adaptations of the method might be necessary to isolate pollen stages from other maize inbred lines.

Author contribution statement

KB and TD designed the study. KB performed the experiments. KB and TD wrote and approved the final manuscript. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 82 kb)
  10 in total

1.  The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics.

Authors:  Patrick S Schnable; Doreen Ware; Robert S Fulton; Joshua C Stein; Fusheng Wei; Shiran Pasternak; Chengzhi Liang; Jianwei Zhang; Lucinda Fulton; Tina A Graves; Patrick Minx; Amy Denise Reily; Laura Courtney; Scott S Kruchowski; Chad Tomlinson; Cindy Strong; Kim Delehaunty; Catrina Fronick; Bill Courtney; Susan M Rock; Eddie Belter; Feiyu Du; Kyung Kim; Rachel M Abbott; Marc Cotton; Andy Levy; Pamela Marchetto; Kerri Ochoa; Stephanie M Jackson; Barbara Gillam; Weizu Chen; Le Yan; Jamey Higginbotham; Marco Cardenas; Jason Waligorski; Elizabeth Applebaum; Lindsey Phelps; Jason Falcone; Krishna Kanchi; Thynn Thane; Adam Scimone; Nay Thane; Jessica Henke; Tom Wang; Jessica Ruppert; Neha Shah; Kelsi Rotter; Jennifer Hodges; Elizabeth Ingenthron; Matt Cordes; Sara Kohlberg; Jennifer Sgro; Brandon Delgado; Kelly Mead; Asif Chinwalla; Shawn Leonard; Kevin Crouse; Kristi Collura; Dave Kudrna; Jennifer Currie; Ruifeng He; Angelina Angelova; Shanmugam Rajasekar; Teri Mueller; Rene Lomeli; Gabriel Scara; Ara Ko; Krista Delaney; Marina Wissotski; Georgina Lopez; David Campos; Michele Braidotti; Elizabeth Ashley; Wolfgang Golser; HyeRan Kim; Seunghee Lee; Jinke Lin; Zeljko Dujmic; Woojin Kim; Jayson Talag; Andrea Zuccolo; Chuanzhu Fan; Aswathy Sebastian; Melissa Kramer; Lori Spiegel; Lidia Nascimento; Theresa Zutavern; Beth Miller; Claude Ambroise; Stephanie Muller; Will Spooner; Apurva Narechania; Liya Ren; Sharon Wei; Sunita Kumari; Ben Faga; Michael J Levy; Linda McMahan; Peter Van Buren; Matthew W Vaughn; Kai Ying; Cheng-Ting Yeh; Scott J Emrich; Yi Jia; Ananth Kalyanaraman; An-Ping Hsia; W Brad Barbazuk; Regina S Baucom; Thomas P Brutnell; Nicholas C Carpita; Cristian Chaparro; Jer-Ming Chia; Jean-Marc Deragon; James C Estill; Yan Fu; Jeffrey A Jeddeloh; Yujun Han; Hyeran Lee; Pinghua Li; Damon R Lisch; Sanzhen Liu; Zhijie Liu; Dawn Holligan Nagel; Maureen C McCann; Phillip SanMiguel; Alan M Myers; Dan Nettleton; John Nguyen; Bryan W Penning; Lalit Ponnala; Kevin L Schneider; David C Schwartz; Anupma Sharma; Carol Soderlund; Nathan M Springer; Qi Sun; Hao Wang; Michael Waterman; Richard Westerman; Thomas K Wolfgruber; Lixing Yang; Yeisoo Yu; Lifang Zhang; Shiguo Zhou; Qihui Zhu; Jeffrey L Bennetzen; R Kelly Dawe; Jiming Jiang; Ning Jiang; Gernot G Presting; Susan R Wessler; Srinivas Aluru; Robert A Martienssen; Sandra W Clifton; W Richard McCombie; Rod A Wing; Richard K Wilson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Drought stress delays endosperm development and misregulates genes associated with cytoskeleton organization and grain quality proteins in developing wheat seeds.

Authors:  Kevin Begcy; Harkamal Walia
Journal:  Plant Sci       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.729

3.  Comparative cytological and transcriptomic analysis of pollen development in autotetraploid and diploid rice.

Authors:  Jinwen Wu; Muhammad Qasim Shahid; Haibin Guo; Wei Yin; Zhixiong Chen; Lan Wang; Xiangdong Liu; Yonggen Lu
Journal:  Plant Reprod       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 3.767

Review 4.  Using maize as a model to study pollen tube growth and guidance, cross-incompatibility and sperm delivery in grasses.

Authors:  Thomas Dresselhaus; Andreas Lausser; Mihaela L Márton
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Developmental staging of maize microspores reveals a transition in developing microspore proteins.

Authors:  P A Bedinger; M D Edgerton
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Expression of MADS box genes ZMM8 and ZMM14 during inflorescence development of Zea mays discriminates between the upper and the lower floret of each spikelet.

Authors:  J Cacharr n; H Saedler; G Theissen
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 0.900

7.  The Inflorescences of Maize.

Authors:  O T Bonnett
Journal:  Science       Date:  1954-07-16       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Male reproductive development: gene expression profiling of maize anther and pollen ontogeny.

Authors:  Jiong Ma; David S Skibbe; John Fernandes; Virginia Walbot
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 13.583

Review 9.  A decade of pollen transcriptomics.

Authors:  Nicholas Rutley; David Twell
Journal:  Plant Reprod       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 3.767

10.  The transcriptome landscape of early maize meiosis.

Authors:  Stefanie Dukowic-Schulze; Anitha Sundararajan; Joann Mudge; Thiruvarangan Ramaraj; Andrew D Farmer; Minghui Wang; Qi Sun; Jaroslaw Pillardy; Shahryar Kianian; Ernest F Retzel; Wojciech P Pawlowski; Changbin Chen
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 4.215

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Pheno4D: A spatio-temporal dataset of maize and tomato plant point clouds for phenotyping and advanced plant analysis.

Authors:  David Schunck; Federico Magistri; Radu Alexandru Rosu; André Cornelißen; Nived Chebrolu; Stefan Paulus; Jens Léon; Sven Behnke; Cyrill Stachniss; Heiner Kuhlmann; Lasse Klingbeil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Male Sterility in Maize after Transient Heat Stress during the Tetrad Stage of Pollen Development.

Authors:  Kevin Begcy; Tetyana Nosenko; Liang-Zi Zhou; Lena Fragner; Wolfram Weckwerth; Thomas Dresselhaus
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 3.  Epigenetic responses to abiotic stresses during reproductive development in cereals.

Authors:  Kevin Begcy; Thomas Dresselhaus
Journal:  Plant Reprod       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.767

4.  MeioCapture: an efficient method for staging and isolation of meiocytes in the prophase I sub-stages of meiosis in wheat.

Authors:  Arun S K Shunmugam; Venkatesh Bollina; Stefanie Dukowic-Schulze; Pankaj K Bhowmik; Chris Ambrose; James D Higgins; Curtis Pozniak; Andrew G Sharpe; Kevin Rozwadowski; Sateesh Kagale
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 4.215

5.  Overexpression of an evolutionarily conserved drought-responsive sugarcane gene enhances salinity and drought resilience.

Authors:  Kevin Begcy; Eduardo D Mariano; Carolina G Lembke; Sonia Marli Zingaretti; Glaucia M Souza; Pedro Araújo; Marcelo Menossi
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Genome-wide identification of heat shock factors and heat shock proteins in response to UV and high intensity light stress in lettuce.

Authors:  Taehoon Kim; Shafina Samraj; Juan Jiménez; Celina Gómez; Tie Liu; Kevin Begcy
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 4.215

7.  Chymotrypsin is a molecular target of insect resistance of three corn varieties against the Asian corn borer, Ostrinia furnacalis.

Authors:  Eun Young Kim; Jin Kyo Jung; I Hyeon Kim; Yonggyun Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.