Literature DB >> 29101301

Do-not-attempt-resuscitation (DNAR) orders: understanding and interpretation of their use in the hospitalised patient in Ireland. A brief report.

Helen O'Brien1,2, Siobhan Scarlett1,2, Anne Brady3, Kieran Harkin4, Rose Anne Kenny1,2, Jeanne Moriarty5.   

Abstract

Following the introduction of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders in the 1970s, there was widespread misinterpretation of the term among healthcare professionals. In this brief report, we present findings from a survey of healthcare professionals. Our aim was to examine current understanding of the term do-not-attempt-resuscitate (DNAR), decision-making surrounding DNAR and awareness of current guidelines. The survey was distributed to doctors and nurses in a university teaching hospital and affiliated primary care physicians in Dublin via email and by hard copy at educational meetings from July to December 2014. A total of 519 completed the survey. The response rate in the hospital doctors group was 35.5% (187/527), 19.8% (292/1477) in the nurses group but 68.8% (150/218) in the specialist nurses group and 40% (40/100) in the primary care physician group.Alarmingly, our results demonstrate that 26.8% of staff nurses and 30% of primary care physicians surveyed believed that a patient with a DNAR order could not receive any/at least one of a list of simple treatments including antibiotics, physiotherapy, intravenous fluids, pain relief, oxygen, nasogastric feeding or airway suctioning, which were higher percentages compared to the other hospital doctors and experienced nurses groups with statistically significant differences (p<0.001). Furthermore, a higher percentage of staff nurses (26.8%) and primary care physicians (22.5%) believed that a patient with a DNAR order could not be referred to hospital from home/a nursing home, when compared with other healthcare groups (p<0.001). Our findings highlight continued misunderstanding and over-interpretation of DNAR orders. Further collaboration and information is required for meaningful Advance Care Plans. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aged; clinical ethics; decision-making; end-of-life; right to healthcare

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29101301     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  3 in total

1.  What's in a Do-Not-Resuscitate Order? Understanding the Impact on Pre-arrest Life Support and Factors Influencing Misconceptions.

Authors:  Victoria T Charoonratana; Talia Stewart; Runzhi Zhang; Zhigang Li; Martha T DesBiens; Scott Slogic; Maxwell T Vergo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders: attitudes, perceptions and practices of Swedish physicians and nurses.

Authors:  Anders Bremer; Kristofer Årestedt; Ewa Rosengren; Jörg Carlsson; Samuel Sandboge
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.652

3.  Usage of do-not-attempt-to-resuscitate orders in a Swedish community hospital - patient involvement, documentation and compliance.

Authors:  Emilie Bertilsson; Birgitta Semark; Kristina Schildmeijer; Anders Bremer; Jörg Carlsson
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 2.652

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.