Literature DB >> 29101260

Long-term performance of colorectal cancerscreening programmes based on the faecal immunochemical test.

Manuel Zorzi1, Cesare Hassan2, Giulia Capodaglio3, Chiara Fedato4, Adriana Montaguti4, Anna Turrin4, Alberto Rosano1, Daniele Monetti1, Carmen Stocco1, Susanna Baracco1, Francesca Russo4, Alessandro Repici5, Massimo Rugge6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The long-term performance of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes based on a 2-year faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is still unclear.
METHODS: In a sample of 50 to 69-year-olds repeatedly screened with the FIT (OC-Hemodia latex agglutination test; cut-off: 20 µg haemoglobin/g faeces), we examined: (1) the FIT positivity rate, the CRC and advanced adenoma detection rate and the FIT's positive predictive value (PPV) for advanced neoplasia, at each round of screening and (2) the cumulative CRC and advanced adenoma detection rate after five rounds of FIT.
RESULTS: Over 12 years (2002-2014), 123 347 individuals were administered the FIT up to six times, and 781 CRCs and 4713 advanced adenomas were diagnosed. The CRC and advanced adenoma detection rates declined substantially from the first to the third (rate ratio (RR) 0.25, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.32) and second (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.56) rounds, respectively, and then remained stable. The PPV for advanced neoplasia dropped by 18% in the second round (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.89), with no further reduction thereafter due to a concomitant decline in the FIT positivity rate (RR first to sixth rounds: 0.56, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.60).The cumulative CRC and advanced adenoma detection rates over five consecutive rounds were 8.5‰ (95% CI 7.8 to 9.2), and 58.9‰ (95% CI 56.9 to 61.0), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Repeated FIT significantly reduces the burden of colorectal disease while facilitating an efficient use of colonoscopy resources. The cumulative detection rate after five rounds of FIT is similar to primary screening with colonoscopy, supporting the need to account for the cumulative sensitivity of repeated FITs when evaluating the test's efficacy. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colonic neoplasms; colonic polyps; colonoscopy; colorectal cancer; colorectal cancer screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29101260     DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  16 in total

1.  Colorectal Cancer Screening With High Risk-Factor Questionnaire and Fecal Immunochemical Tests Among 5, 947, 986 Asymptomatic Population: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Mingqing Zhang; Lizhong Zhao; Yongdan Zhang; Haoren Jing; Lianbo Wei; Zhixuan Li; Haixiang Zhang; Yong Zhang; Siwei Zhu; Shiwu Zhang; Xipeng Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 5.738

2.  Factors Affecting Adherence in a Pragmatic Trial of Annual Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Carrie M Nielson; William M Vollmer; Amanda F Petrik; Erin M Keast; Beverly B Green; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  The Costs and Benefits of Risk Stratification for Colorectal Cancer Screening Based On Phenotypic and Genetic Risk: A Health Economic Analysis.

Authors:  Chloe Thomas; Olena Mandrik; Catherine L Saunders; Deborah Thompson; Sophie Whyte; Simon Griffin; Juliet A Usher-Smith
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2021-05-26

4.  Strategies to Improve Follow-up After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests in a Community-Based Setting: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Kevin Selby; Christopher D Jensen; Wei K Zhao; Jeffrey K Lee; Arielle Slam; Joanne E Schottinger; Peter Bacchetti; Theodore R Levin; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.488

5.  The cumulative false-positive rate in colorectal cancer screening: a Markov analysis.

Authors:  Ulrike Haug; Veerle M H Coupé
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 6.  Diagnostic Accuracy Of Fecal Occult Blood Tests For Detecting Proximal Versus Distal Colorectal Neoplasia: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ming Lu; Xiaohu Luo; Ni Li; Hongda Chen; Min Dai
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.790

7.  The IARC Perspective on Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Béatrice Lauby-Secretan; Nadia Vilahur; Franca Bianchini; Neela Guha; Kurt Straif
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 176.079

8.  Faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening in Mexico: an initial experience.

Authors:  José María Remes-Troche; Gabriela Hinojosa-Garza; Priscilla Espinosa-Tamez; Arturo Meixueiro-Daza; Peter Grube-Pagola; Katherine Van Loon; Michael B Potter; Martin Lajous
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 2.290

9.  Detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia and relative colonoscopy workloads using quantitative faecal immunochemical tests: an observational study exploring the effects of simultaneous adjustment of both sample number and test positivity threshold.

Authors:  Graeme P Young; Richard J Woodman; Erin Symonds
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-09

10.  Faecal immunochemical test after negative colonoscopy may reduce the risk of incident colorectal cancer in a population-based screening programme.

Authors:  Szu-Min Peng; Wen-Feng Hsu; Ying-Wei Wang; Li-Ju Lin; Amy Ming-Fang Yen; Li-Sheng Chen; Yi-Chia Lee; Ming-Shiang Wu; Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen; Han-Mo Chiu
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.