Literature DB >> 29100923

Food waste quantification in primary production - The Nordic countries as a case study.

Hanna Hartikainen1, Lisbeth Mogensen2, Erik Svanes3, Ulrika Franke4.   

Abstract

Our understanding of food waste in the food supply chain has increased, but very few studies have been published on food waste in primary production. The overall aims of this study were to quantify the total amount of food waste in primary production in Finland, Sweden, Norway and Denmark, and to create a framework for how to define and quantify food waste in primary production. The quantification of food waste was based on case studies conducted in the present study and estimates published in scientific literature. The chosen scope of the study was to quantify the amount of edible food (excluding inedible parts like peels and bones) produced for human consumption that did not end up as food. As a result, the quantification was different from the existing guidelines. One of the main differences is that food that ends up as animal feed is included in the present study, whereas this is not the case for the recently launched food waste definition of the FUSIONS project. To distinguish the 'food waste' definition of the present study from the existing definitions and to avoid confusion with established usage of the term, a new term 'side flow' (SF) was introduced as a synonym for food waste in primary production. A rough estimate of the total amount of food waste in primary production in Finland, Sweden, Norway and Denmark was made using SF and 'FUSIONS Food Waste' (FFW) definitions. The SFs in primary production in the four Nordic countries were an estimated 800,000 tonnes per year with an additional 100,000 tonnes per year from the rearing phase of animals. The 900,000 tonnes per year of SF corresponds to 3.7% of the total production of 24,000,000 tonnes per year of edible primary products. When using the FFW definition proposed by the FUSIONS project, the FFW amount was estimated at 330,000 tonnes per year, or 1% of the total production.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agriculture; Food loss; Food waste; Harmonization; Methodological framework; Primary production

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29100923     DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.10.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag        ISSN: 0956-053X            Impact factor:   7.145


  6 in total

Review 1.  Pumpkin Waste as Livestock Feed: Impact on Nutrition and Animal Health and on Quality of Meat, Milk, and Egg.

Authors:  Laura Patricia Valdez-Arjona; Mónica Ramírez-Mella
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 2.  Fermentation of Agri-Food Waste: A Promising Route for the Production of Aroma Compounds.

Authors:  Jasmine Hadj Saadoun; Gaia Bertani; Alessia Levante; Fabio Vezzosi; Annalisa Ricci; Valentina Bernini; Camilla Lazzi
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-03-26

3.  Triple Bottom-Line Evaluation of the Production of Animal Feed from Food Waste: A Life Cycle Assessment.

Authors:  Alla Alsaleh; Esra Aleisa
Journal:  Waste Biomass Valorization       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 3.449

4.  Quantification of food waste per product group along the food supply chain in the European Union: a mass flow analysis.

Authors:  Carla Caldeira; Valeria De Laurentiis; Sara Corrado; Freija van Holsteijn; Serenella Sala
Journal:  Resour Conserv Recycl       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 10.204

5.  Food Waste in Primary Production: Milk Loss With Mitigation Potentials.

Authors:  Margaret D March; Luiza Toma; Bethan Thompson; Marie J Haskell
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2019-11-12

6.  Addition of Orange Peel in Orange Jam: Evaluation of Sensory, Physicochemical, and Nutritional Characteristics.

Authors:  Flavia Teixeira; Bruna Aparecida Dos Santos; Graziela Nunes; Jaqueline Machado Soares; Luane Aparecida do Amaral; Gabriel Henrique Oliveira de Souza; Juliano Tadeu Vilela de Resende; Bruna Menegassi; Bruna Paola Murino Rafacho; Kélin Schwarz; Elisvânia Freitas Dos Santos; Daiana Novello
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 4.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.