Literature DB >> 29100646

An Unexpected Risk Factor for Early Structural Deterioration of Biological Aortic Valve Prostheses.

Carlo Bassano1, Valentina Gislao2, Emanuele Bovio2, Sonia Melino3, Ilaria Tropea2, Guglielmo Saitto2, Marta Pugliese2, Dionisio F Colella4, Antonio Scafuri2, Giovanni Ruvolo2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An alarming rate of early failure has been recently reported for the LivaNova (previously Sorin) Mitroflow (LivaNova, London, UK) bioprosthesis. Here, we aimed at verifying if this possible underperformance is confirmed in a large, single-center experience and identifying the risk factors associated with early deterioration.
METHODS: In all, 459 Mitroflow valves have been implanted from July 2009 to December 2013 (patients' mean age 73 years; 204 women). Surviving patients have undergone yearly clinic and echocardiographic follow-up. Dysfunction was defined as moderate if the mean gradient was more than 30 mm Hg or severe if it exceeded 40 mm Hg. The population was divided on the basis of a dimensional mismatch, the model of the prosthesis (LX or DL: follow-up to 4 years), and patient's age at the time of implantation.
RESULTS: Cumulative freedom from moderate valve dysfunction was 81% ± 3% at 60 months. It was lower with patient-prosthesis mismatch (71% ± 5% versus 92% ± 3%; p = 0.0065) and with the more recent DL model (at 42 months: 78% ± 6% versus 96% ± 2%; p < 0.0001). Cumulative freedom from severe dysfunction was 93% ± 2% at 5 years. Again, it was inferior among patients with a mismatch (86% ± 4% versus 100%; p = 0.0013) and for the DL model (42 months: 92.5% ± 3% versus 98.5% ± 1%; p = 0.0309). Smaller prostheses showed higher rates of early degeneration.
CONCLUSIONS: The LivaNova Mitroflow valve appears to be prone to early deterioration. Smaller size prostheses should be used cautiously and avoided with patient-prosthesis mismatch. The DL model anticalcification treatment seems unable to prevent early degeneration, and possibly contributes to even earlier failure.
Copyright © 2018 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29100646     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  3 in total

1.  Early structural degeneration of Mitroflow aortic valve: another issue in addition to the mismatch?

Authors:  Giovanni Ruvolo; Calogera Pisano; Carmela Rita Balistreri; Emiliano Maresi; Oreste Fabio Triolo; Vincenzo Argano; Carlo Bassano; Sara Rita Vacirca; Paolo Nardi; Augusto Orlandi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Comparison of Long-term Performance of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves in Sweden From 2003 to 2018.

Authors:  Michael Persson; Natalie Glaser; Johan Nilsson; Örjan Friberg; Anders Franco-Cereceda; Ulrik Sartipy
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-03-01

3.  Mitroflow Aortic Bioprosthesis Failure in Type B Aortic Dissection: Preventive Left Main Stenting in Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Strategy.

Authors:  Giovanni Alfonso Chiariello; Emmanuel Villa; Antonio Messina; Stefano Marwan Mangini; Massimiliano Rozzi; Margherita Dalla Tomba; Ornella Leonzi; Giovanni Troise
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2018-04-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.