Literature DB >> 2910064

Fetal loss associated with two seasonal sources of electromagnetic field exposure.

N Wertheimer1, E Leeper.   

Abstract

We have studied two sources of electromagnetic fields where exposure is highly seasonal (ceiling cable electric heat and electrically heated beds). Because many potential confounders could not be addressed, we can make no valid statement about overall differences in abortion rates between those exposed and those not exposed to these seasonal sources. However, by analyzing seasonal trends, we have minimized the problem of unaddressed confounders because we did not look at a difference between the user and nonuser groups, but rather at a difference within the user group during months of higher exposure compared with months of lower exposure. Thus, each user group provides its own control. The function of the nonuser control group is simply to assure that any seasonal trend found in the user group is not just a general seasonal variation in reported fetal loss that can be found equally well in the nonuser population. Using this technique, we found that each user group reported fetal loss disproportionately often during the season when electromagnetic field exposure was increasing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2910064     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  7 in total

1.  Electromagnetic radiation in homes.

Authors:  S Best
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-02-17

2.  Video display terminal use during pregnancy and reproductive outcome--a meta-analysis.

Authors:  F Parazzini; L Luchini; C La Vecchia; P G Crosignani
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 3.  Exposure to Power-Frequency Magnetic Fields and the Risk of Infertility and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Update on the Human Evidence and Recommendations for Future Study Designs.

Authors:  Ryan C Lewis; Russ Hauser; Andrew D Maynard; Richard L Neitzel; Lu Wang; Robert Kavet; John D Meeker
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 6.393

4.  Temporal variability of daily personal magnetic field exposure metrics in pregnant women.

Authors:  Ryan C Lewis; Kelly R Evenson; David A Savitz; John D Meeker
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 5.  Review of the epidemiologic literature on EMF and Health.

Authors:  I C Ahlbom; E Cardis; A Green; M Linet; D Savitz; A Swerdlow
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Effect of electromagnetic field on abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Masumeh Ghazanfarpour; Zahra Atarodi Kashani; Reza Pakzad; Fatemeh Abdi; Fatemeh Alsadat Rahnemaei; Pouran Akhavan Akbari; Nasibeh Roozbeh
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2021-11-03

Review 7.  Human adverse reproductive outcomes and electromagnetic field exposures: review of epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  G M Shaw; L A Croen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.