| Literature DB >> 29100518 |
Reshma Kumari1, Sumit Kumar2, Ashwani Kumar3, Kapil Kumar Goel3, Ramesh Chandra Dubey2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Antibacterial, immunomodulatory and antioxidant properties of aerial parts of Barleria lupulina Lindl were investigated in the present communication.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant activity; Barleria lupulina; Immunomodulatory; Minimum inhibitory concentration; Phytochemical analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29100518 PMCID: PMC5670697 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-017-1989-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Phytochemical constituents present in the extracts of different part of B. lupulina
| Test | Extracts | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| MLE | ALE | MSE | |
| Alkaloids | + | – | + |
| Steroids | – | – | + |
| Saponins | + | + | – |
| Cardiac glycosides | – | – | – |
| Tannins | + | – | + |
| Flavonoids | + | + | + |
| Proteins | + | – | + |
| Aminoacids | – | – | – |
| Sugars | – | + | + |
‘+’ – Indicates the presence of phytochemical compounds
‘-’ - Indicates the absence of phytochemical compounds
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) extracts of B. lupulina and bacterial survivala
| Extracts | MIC (mg/mL) of different bacterial species | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| MLE | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| ALE | 10.0 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| MSE | 5.0 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 10.0 | 2.5 |
| ASE | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Control | (9248) | (9472) | (8960) | (9152) | (9248) |
aValues in parentheses represent bacterial survival represented as total bacterial count (CFUs/mL)
Total phenolic contents (%) in different extracts of B. lupulina
| Extracts | Extracts (%) |
|---|---|
| MLE | 67.62 |
| MSE | 76.67 |
| Gallic acid (Standard) = 73.56 μg/mL | |
| Blank reading = 0.763 nm | |
Effect of leaf extracts of B. lupulina in DPPH antioxidant model
| Concentrations (μg/mL) | Percentage of inhibition of leaf extracts | |
|---|---|---|
| MLE | MSE | |
| 20 | 12.3198 | 3.408 |
| 30 | 19.031 | 15.99 |
| 40 | 33.340 | 34.469 |
| 50 | 59.131 | 58.06 |
| IC50 value | 48.86 | 60.82 |
Blank reading = 0.763 nm
Toxicity analysis of methanolic leaf and stem extracts of B. lupulina on albino rats
| Animal groupa | Extract dose (mg/kg b. wt)/Mortality (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| MLE | MSE | |
| I | 200/0 | 200/0 |
| II | 400/0 | 400/0 |
| III | 600/0 | 600/0 |
| Control groupb | 10/0 | 10/0 |
aEach group contain 6 albino rats
bVehicle control = Pure saline
Effect of methanolic leaf and stem extracts of B. lupulina on hemagglutination antibody (HA) titre
| Animal groupa | Extract Dose(mg/kg body wt) | HA titre (mean ± SD) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MLE | MSE | ||
| Control | 10 mL/kg Controlb | 21.52 ± 0.57 | |
| I | 200 | 23.21 ± 1.26 | 24.50 ± 1.20 |
| II | 400 | 35.0 ± 2.91 | 28.0 ± 2.91 |
| III | 600 | 44.0 ± 3.02 | 36.0 ± 3.12 |
Values are mean ± S.D., p < 0.01 significant
aEach group contain 6 albino rats
bVehicle control = Pure saline
Effect of methanolic leaf and stem extracts of B. lupulina on delayed type hypersensitivity response
| Animal groupa | Extract Dose(mg/kg b.wt) | DTH response (mm) (Mean ± SD) after 24, 48 and 72 h treatment | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLE | MSE | ||||||
| 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | ||
| Control | 10 ml/kg | 0.20 ± 0.10 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 0.18 ± 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.10 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 0.18 ± 0.01 |
| I | 200 | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 0.26 ± 0.03 | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 0.22 ± 0.05 | 0.23 ± 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.05 |
| II | 400 | 0.30 ± 0.02 | 0.30 ± 0.03 | 0.29 ± 0.01 | 0.24 ± 0.01 | 0.23 ± 0.03 | 0.22 ± 0.08 |
| III | 600 | 0.36 ± 0.05 | 0.35 ± 0.57 | 0.34 ± 0.57 | 0.32 ± 0.05 | 0.31 ± 0.02 | 0.30 ± 0.08 |
Values are mean ± S.D., P < 0.01 significant
aEach group contain 6 albino rats
bVehicle control = Pure saline
Effect of methanolic leaf extract of B. lupulina on neutrophil adhesion
| Animal groupa | Extract Dose(mg/kg body wt.) | TLC (103 cells/ μL) | Neutrophil (%) | Neutrophil Index | Neutrophil Adhesion (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UB | FTB | UB | FTB | UB | FTB | |||
| Control | 10 ml/kgControlb | 4.50 ± 2.01 | 4.35 ± 8.40 | 7.52 ± 2.10 | 7.21 ± 3.05 | 33.84 ± 10.01 | 31.36 ± 5.21 | 7.32 ± 1.91 |
| I | 200 | 5.00 ± 3.20 | 4.85 ± 2.10 | 6.80 ± 5.12 | 6.00 ± 0.97 | 31.0 ± 0.52 | 29.10 ± 0.89 | 14.72 ± 2.56 |
| II | 400 | 6.98 ± 1.25 | 6.95 ± 0.13 | 7.40 ± 2.50 | 7.10 ± 3.12 | 51.65 ± 1.60 | 42.95 ± 0.23 | 16.84 ± 3.02 |
| III | 600 | 8.81 ± 0.12 | 7.20 ± 0.57 | 8.40 ± 0.57 | 8.02 ± 0.91 | 74.00 ± 1.24 | 57.74 ± 1.60 | 21.97 ± 1.18 |
Values are mean ± S.D., p < 0.01 singnificant
aEach group contain 6 albino rats
bVehicle control = Pure saline
UB Untreated blood
FTB Fiber treated blood
Effect of methanolic stem extract of B. lupulina on neutrophil adhesion
| Animal groupa | Extract Dose(mg/kg body wt.) | TLC (103 cells/ μL) | Neutrophil (%) | Neutrophil Index | Neutrophil Adhesion (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UB | FTB | UB | FTB | UB | FTB | |||
| Control | 10 ml/kgControlb | 4.50 ± 2.01 | 4.35 ± 8.40 | 7.52 ± 2.10 | 7.21 ± 3.05 | 33.84 ± 10.01 | 31.36 ± 5.21 | 7.32 ± 1.91 |
| I | 200 | 6.52 ± 0.29 | 6.23 ± 0.33 | 8.12 ± 1.98 | 7.03 ± 1.50 | 52.98 ± 4.13 | 43.79 ± 1.23 | 13.5 ± 5.48 |
| II | 400 | 7.21 ± 0.33 | 7.12 ± 0.72 | 10.52 ± 2.00 | 8.92 ± 2.52 | 75.84 ± 3.09 | 43.79 ± 1.23 | 16.25 ± 4.27 |
| III | 600 | 8.55 ± 0.17 | 8.08 ± 0.15 | 11.20 ± 4.50 | 9.50 ± 5.12 | 95.76 ± 4.96 | 76.76 ± 5.26 | 19.84 ± 5.20 |
Values are mean ± S.D., p < 0.01 significant
aEach group contain 6 albino rats
bVehicle control = Pure saline
UB Untreated blood
FTB Fiber treated blood