Hsueh-Fang Peng1, Ti Yin2, Luke Yang3, Chi Wang4, Yue-Cune Chang5, Mei-Jy Jeng6, Jen-Jiuan Liaw7. 1. Department of Nursing, Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. 2. Nursing Department, Song-Shan Branch, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. 3. Department of Social Work, Hsuan Chuang University, Taiwan. 4. Department of Nursing, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. 5. Department of Mathematics, Tamkang University, Taipei, Taiwan. 6. Institute of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan. 7. School of Nursing, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan. Electronic address: jiuanliaw@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Preterm infant pain can be relieved by combining non-nutritive sucking (sucking), oral sucrose, and facilitated tucking (tucking), but the pain-relief effects of oral expressed breast milk (breast milk) are ambiguous. AIMS: We compared the effects of combined sucking+ breast milk, sucking+breast milk+tucking, and routine care on preterm infant pain during and after heel-stick procedures. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized controlled trial. SETTINGS: Level III neonatal intensive care unit and a neonatal unit at a medical center in Taipei. PARTICIPANTS/ SUBJECTS: Preterm infants (N=109, gestational age 29-37 weeks, stable disease condition) needing procedural heel sticks were recruited by convenience sampling and randomly assigned to three treatment conditions: routine care, sucking+ breast milk, and sucking+breast milk+ tucking. METHODS: Pain was measured by watching video recordings of infants undergoing heel-stick procedures and scoring pain at 1-min intervals with the Premature Infant Pain Profile. Data were collected over eight phases: baseline (phase 1, 10min without stimuli before heel stick), during heel stick (phases 2 and 3), and a 10-min recovery (phases 4-8). RESULTS: For infants receiving sucking+ breast milk, pain-score changes from baseline across phases 2-8 were 2.634, 4.303, 2.812, 2.271, 1.465, 0.704, and 1.452 units lower than corresponding pain-score changes of infants receiving routine care (all p-values <0.05 except for phases 6 and 7). Similarly, for infants receiving sucking +breast milk+ tucking, pain-score changes from baseline were 2.652, 3.644, 1.686, 1.770, 1.409, 1.165, and 2.210 units lower than corresponding pain-score changes in infants receiving routine care across phases 2-8 (all p-values <0.05 except for phase 4). After receiving sucking +breast milk +tucking and sucking +breast milk, infants' risk of mild pain (pain score ≥6) significantly decreased 67.0% and 70.1%, respectively, compared to infants receiving routine care. After receiving sucking +breast milk +tucking and sucking +breast milk, infants' risk of moderate-to-severe pain (pain score ≥12) decreased 87.4% and 95.7%, respectively, compared to infants receiving routine care. CONCLUSION: The combined use of sucking+breast milk +tucking and sucking+breast milk effectively reduced preterm infants' mild pain and moderate-to-severe pain during heel-stick procedures. Adding facilitated tucking helped infants recover from pain across eight phases of heel-stick procedures. Our findings advance knowledge on the effects of combining expressed breast milk, sucking, and tucking on preterm infants' procedural pain.
BACKGROUND: Preterm infant pain can be relieved by combining non-nutritive sucking (sucking), oral sucrose, and facilitated tucking (tucking), but the pain-relief effects of oral expressed breast milk (breast milk) are ambiguous. AIMS: We compared the effects of combined sucking+ breast milk, sucking+breast milk+tucking, and routine care on preterm infant pain during and after heel-stick procedures. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized controlled trial. SETTINGS: Level III neonatal intensive care unit and a neonatal unit at a medical center in Taipei. PARTICIPANTS/ SUBJECTS: Preterm infants (N=109, gestational age 29-37 weeks, stable disease condition) needing procedural heel sticks were recruited by convenience sampling and randomly assigned to three treatment conditions: routine care, sucking+ breast milk, and sucking+breast milk+ tucking. METHODS: Pain was measured by watching video recordings of infants undergoing heel-stick procedures and scoring pain at 1-min intervals with the Premature Infant Pain Profile. Data were collected over eight phases: baseline (phase 1, 10min without stimuli before heel stick), during heel stick (phases 2 and 3), and a 10-min recovery (phases 4-8). RESULTS: For infants receiving sucking+ breast milk, pain-score changes from baseline across phases 2-8 were 2.634, 4.303, 2.812, 2.271, 1.465, 0.704, and 1.452 units lower than corresponding pain-score changes of infants receiving routine care (all p-values <0.05 except for phases 6 and 7). Similarly, for infants receiving sucking +breast milk+ tucking, pain-score changes from baseline were 2.652, 3.644, 1.686, 1.770, 1.409, 1.165, and 2.210 units lower than corresponding pain-score changes in infants receiving routine care across phases 2-8 (all p-values <0.05 except for phase 4). After receiving sucking +breast milk +tucking and sucking +breast milk, infants' risk of mild pain (pain score ≥6) significantly decreased 67.0% and 70.1%, respectively, compared to infants receiving routine care. After receiving sucking +breast milk +tucking and sucking +breast milk, infants' risk of moderate-to-severe pain (pain score ≥12) decreased 87.4% and 95.7%, respectively, compared to infants receiving routine care. CONCLUSION: The combined use of sucking+breast milk +tucking and sucking+breast milk effectively reduced preterm infants' mild pain and moderate-to-severe pain during heel-stick procedures. Adding facilitated tucking helped infants recover from pain across eight phases of heel-stick procedures. Our findings advance knowledge on the effects of combining expressed breast milk, sucking, and tucking on preterm infants' procedural pain.
Authors: Chiao-Hsuan Lin; Jen-Jiuan Liaw; Yu-Ting Chen; Ti Yin; Luke Yang; Hsiang-Yun Lan Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-22 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Hsiang-Yun Lan; Luke Yang; Chiao-Hsuan Lin; Kao-Hsian Hsieh; Yue-Cune Chang; Ti Yin Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-10 Impact factor: 3.390