Literature DB >> 29099966

Test-Retest Reliability of the Multiple Sleep Latency Test in Central Disorders of Hypersomnolence.

Régis Lopez1,2,3, Anis Doukkali2, Lucie Barateau1,2,3, Elisa Evangelista2,3, Sofiene Chenini2, Isabelle Jaussent3, Yves Dauvilliers1,2,3.   

Abstract

Study
Objectives: To assess the test-retest reliability of the polysomnography-multiple sleep latency test (PSG-MSLT) diagnostic classification and measures and to study the determinants of its variability in patients with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) or with noncataplectic central disorders of hypersomnolence (NCHS): type 2 (NT2), idiopathic hypersomnia (IH), and unspecified hypersomnolence (unspecified excessive daytime sleepiness [UnsEDS]).
Methods: PSG-MSLT in drug-free conditions was administered twice (median interval of 1.9 years) in 22 patients with NT1 (10 males, median age 31.2 years) and 75 patients with NCHS (32 males, median age 25.7 years).
Results: At the first PSG-MSLT, patients with NCHS were classified as having NT2 (22.7%), IH (26.7%), or UnsEDS (50.6%). A positive PSG-MSLT was confirmed in 72.7% of NT1. The classification consistency at retesting was significantly lower for the NT2 (47.1%), IH (25.0%), and UnsEDS (42.1%) categories than NT1 (81.3%). The between-test mean sleep latency (MSL) variability was significantly different in NT1 and NCHS, with higher changes in NT2 and lower in NT1. A longer test-retest interval was associated with improved MSL and MSLT normalization. Between-test variations in SOREMP number were associated with changes in nocturnal REM sleep parameters and MSL. No association was found with the clinical decision to repeat the evaluation or the disease clinical course.
Conclusion: The PSG-MSLT measures and classification are not stable in patients with NCHS, with frequent diagnostic changes, particularly for NT2 and IH, compared with NT1. MSLT needs to be repeated at regular intervals to confirm a stable hypersomnia and provide an accurate diagnosis of NT2 and IH. © Sleep Research Society 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Sleep Research Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hypersomnolence; idiopathic hypersomnia; multiple sleep latency test; narcolepsy; test–retest reliability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29099966     DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsx164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sleep        ISSN: 0161-8105            Impact factor:   5.849


  20 in total

Review 1.  Inside the clinical evaluation of sleepiness: subjective and objective tools.

Authors:  Simone Baiardi; Susanna Mondini
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.816

2.  Establishing the objective sleep phenotype in hypersomnolence disorder with and without comorbid major depression.

Authors:  David T Plante; Jesse D Cook; Leonardo S Barbosa; Michael R Goldstein; Michael L Prairie; Richard F Smith; Brady A Riedner
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 5.849

3.  Impaired neurobehavioral alertness quantified by the psychomotor vigilance task is associated with depression in the Wisconsin Sleep Cohort study.

Authors:  David T Plante; Erika W Hagen; Laurel A Ravelo; Paul E Peppard
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.492

4.  Idiopathic Hypersomnia Severity Scale to better quantify symptoms severity and their consequences in idiopathic hypersomnia.

Authors:  Anna Laura Rassu; Elisa Evangelista; Lucie Barateau; Sofiene Chenini; Régis Lopez; Isabelle Jaussent; Yves Dauvilliers
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 4.062

5.  Disease symptomatology and response to treatment in people with idiopathic hypersomnia: initial data from the Hypersomnia Foundation registry.

Authors:  Lynn Marie Trotti; Jason C Ong; David T Plante; Catherine Friederich Murray; Rebecca King; Donald L Bliwise
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.492

6.  Multimodal assessment increases objective identification of hypersomnolence in patients referred for multiple sleep latency testing.

Authors:  David T Plante; Jesse D Cook; Michael L Prairie
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 4.062

7.  Twice is nice? Test-retest reliability of the Multiple Sleep Latency Test in the central disorders of hypersomnolence.

Authors:  Lynn Marie Trotti
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 4.062

8.  Multiple Sleep Latency Test: when are 4 naps enough?

Authors:  John Goddard; George Tay; Jennifer Fry; Mark Davis; Deanne Curtin; Irene Szollosi
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.062

9.  Self-reported symptoms and objective measures in idiopathic hypersomnia and hypersomnia associated with psychiatric disorders: a prospective cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jitka Bušková; Tomáš Novák; Eva Miletínová; Radana Králová; Jana Košt Álová; Monika Kliková; Karolina Veldová
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.062

10.  Actigraphy prior to Multiple Sleep Latency Test: nighttime total sleep time predicts sleep-onset latency.

Authors:  Monica R Kelly; Michelle R Zeidler; Sharon DeCruz; Caitlin L Oldenkamp; Karen R Josephson; Michael N Mitchell; Michael Littner; Sonia Ancoli-Israel; M Safwan Badr; Cathy A Alessi; Jennifer L Martin
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.