| Literature DB >> 29099952 |
Ehsan Borzoui1, Gadir Nouri-Ganbalani1, Bahram Naseri1.
Abstract
The inhibitory effects of Avena sativa L. seed extract were studied on life history and some physiological aspects of Sitotroga cerealella (Olivier; Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). The inhibition of α-amylase activity in vitro by A. sativa proteinaceous extract suggested its potential antimetabolic effect on S. cerealella larvae. Although, chronic ingestion of A. sativa inhibitor (I10: 0.108 mg protein/artificial seed) did not show significant reduction of the growth and development of S. cerealella. However, a delay in the developmental time of immature stages was detected when S. cerealella larvae were continuously fed on I30 and I50 concentrations (0.429 and 1.11 mg protein/artificial seed, respectively) of the inhibitor. The highest realized fecundity was recorded for females which came from larvae fed on I10 concentration (102.46 ± 2.50 eggs/female), and the lowest fecundity was observed for females which came from larvae fed on I50 concentration (31.64 ± 3.17 eggs/female). The lightest weight of pupae of S. cerealella was observed on I50 concentration (2.76 ± 0.07 mg). The lowest glycogen and lipid contents of the pupae were detected on I50 concentration (50.00 ± 3.53 and 289.57 ± 29.00 µg/pupa, respectively). The lower survival rate of pupae at low temperature indicated that S. cerealella fed on I50 concentration of the inhibitor was less cold tolerant than control insects. The inhibitory studies indicated that A. sativa proteinaceous extract is a good candidate as an inhibitor of the α-amylase of this pest. This inhibitor can be expressed in genetically engineered plants to confer resistance to S. cerealella.Entities:
Keywords: cold tolerance; energy reserve; life span; the Angoumois grain moth; α-amylase inhibitor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29099952 PMCID: PMC5795344 DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/iex088
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Insect Sci ISSN: 1536-2442 Impact factor: 1.857
Fig. 1.Percentage inhibition of amylolytic activity of fourth instar larvae of Sitotroga cerealella by crude inhibitor preparation of Avena sativa. Enzyme and inhibitor were incubated for 30 min prior to the addition of starch to measure enzymatic activity.
Fig. 2.Sitotroga cerealella midgut extracts zymogram using 1% starch as substrate. Enzyme extract was pre-incubated with different concentrations of Avena sativa α-amylase inhibitor at 37°C for 30 min. SDS-PAGE was performed in 10% (w/v) gel with 0.05% SDS for separating gel and 4% for stacking gel with 0.05% SDS. The gel was stained with a solution of 1.3% I2, 3% KI. (A) Crude midgut extract with no inhibitor, (B) 0.11 mg/ml α-AI, (C) 0.22 mg/ml α-AI, (D) 0.45 mg/ml α-AI, (E) 0.90 mg/ml α-AI, and (F) 1.8 mg/ml α-AI.
Fig. 3.pH dependence of Avena sativa α-amylase inhibitor towards Sitotroga cerealella α-amylase. Enzyme and inhibitor (1.8 mg/ml) were incubated at various pHs. Each point represents the average of five replicates. Mean values in a column followed by different letters are significantly different on the basis of ANOVA with Tukey’s test (P < 0.05).
Mean (±SE) duration (days) of larval and pupal period, adults longevity, realized fecundity (eggs laid per female), and egg fertility (percentage of hatched eggs per female) of Sitotroga cerealella fed on artificial seeds supplemented or not (control) with Avena sativa α-amylase inhibitor
| Treatment |
| Larval and pupal period |
| Male longevity |
| Female longevity |
| Fecundity |
| Fertility (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 75 | 30.8 ± 0.2 c | 39 | 7.3 ± 0.1 a | 36 | 7.9 ± 0.1 ab | 36 | 93.5 ± 1.6 b | 36 | 81.1 ± 0.9 a |
| I10 (0.108 mg/artificial seed) | 79 | 29.8 ± 0.2 d | 40 | 7.3 ± 0.1 a | 39 | 8.4 ± 0.2 a | 39 | 102.4 ± 2.5 a | 39 | 82.5 ± 1.2 a |
| I30 (0.429 mg/artificial seed) | 61 | 31.8 ± 0.2 b | 35 | 6.2 ± 0.2 b | 26 | 7.6 ± 0.2 b | 26 | 75.4 ± 2.7 c | 26 | 71.0 ± 1.6 b |
| I50 (1.11 mg/artificial seed) | 43 | 34.5 ± 0.3 a | 26 | 5.6 ± 0.2 c | 17 | 6.3 ± 0.3 c | 17 | 31.6 ± 3.1 d | 17 | 50.0 ± 2.5 c |
| df | 3, 261 | 3, 137 | 3, 120 | 3, 120 | 3, 120 | |||||
|
| 48.14 | 15.30 | 10.48 | 123.61 | 81.41 | |||||
|
| <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
Mean values in a column followed by different letters are significantly different on the basis of ANOVA with Tukey’s test (P< 0.05). The n value shows the number of insects tested for each parameter.
Mean (±SE) weight and energy reserves of Sitotroga cerealella pupae came from larvae fed on artificial seeds supplemented or not (control) with Avena sativa α-amylase inhibitor
| Treatment |
| Pupal weight (mg) | Energy reserves (µg/pupa) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Glycogen |
| Lipid | |||
| Control | 20 | 4.3 ± 0.0 b | 5 | 73.8 ± 1.7 a | 5 | 447.8 ± 7.8 a |
| I10 (0.108 mg/artificial seed) | 20 | 4.5 ± 0.0 a | 5 | 72.2 ± 4.8 a | 5 | 473.3 ± 20.3 a |
| I30 (0.429 mg/artificial seed) | 20 | 3.6 ± 0.0 c | 5 | 61.9 ± 2.0 b | 5 | 368.3 ± 20.9 b |
| I50 (1.11 mg/artificial seed) | 20 | 2.7 ± 0.0 d | 5 | 50.0 ± 3.5 c | 5 | 289.5 ± 29.0 c |
| df | 3, 76 | 3, 16 | 3, 16 | |||
|
| 236.20 | 11.24 | 15.76 | |||
|
| <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | |||
Mean values in a column followed by different letters are significantly different on the basis of ANOVA with Tukey’s test (P< 0.05). The n value shows the number of pupae tested for each parameter.
Survival rate of Sitotroga cerealella pupae following exposure to sub-zero temperatures
| Treatment | Survival rate (%) |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −5°C /24 h | −10°C /24 h | −15°C /24 h | ||
| Control | 90.6 ± 3.3 a,A | 74.6 ± 3.8 a,B | 41.3 ± 4.8 a,C |
|
| I10 (0.108 mg/artificial seed) | 86.6 ± 5.9 a,A | 77.3 ± 5.4 a,B | 40.0 ± 7.6 a,C |
|
| I30 (0.429 mg/artificial seed) | 78.6 ± 5.7 a,A | 48.0 ± 3.8 b,B | 14.6 ± 4.4 b,C |
|
| I50 (1.11 mg/artificial seed) | 34.6 ± 4.4 b,A | 10.6 ± 5.1 c,B | 0.0 ± 0.0 b,B |
|
| df | 3, 16 | 3, 16 | 3, 16 | — |
|
| 26.79 | 43.17 | 16.05 | — |
|
| <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | — |
The pupae came from larvae fed on artificial seeds supplemented or not (control) with A. sativa α-amylase inhibitor. Mean values followed by different lower-case letters in a column, and by different upper-case letters in a row are significantly different on the basis of ANOVA with Tukey’s test (P < 0.05).