BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic hepatic resection (LHR) has been developed as a novel minimally invasive surgery. However, despite improvements in equipment and procedures, intraoperative hemorrhage remains an issue that requires great precaution. To reduce the amount of intraoperative blood loss, we perform the Pringle maneuver, aimed at occluding the inflow of blood into the liver during LHR. This article describes our experience performing LHR using the Pringle maneuver, including postoperative results, and discusses the safety and effectiveness of the Pringle maneuver. METHODS: Data from 83 patients who underwent laparoscopic partial right hepatic resection with or without the Pringle maneuver were retrospectively analyzed with respect to surgical outcomes, safety, and utility. RESULTS: In LHR, the amount of bleeding was significantly lower in cases that included the Pringle maneuver (P = .0314). However, there were no differences in the duration of surgery, surgical margin, rate of curative resections, and incidence of postoperative complications. Laboratory data collected after surgery showed no significant difference between the two groups regardless of whether blood flow was occluded or not. CONCLUSIONS: The Pringle maneuver may be effective in reducing the amount of intraoperative blood loss during laparoscopic partial right hepatic resection, although the difference is not clinically significant. Rather, the reduction in bleeding can reduce the stress experienced by the operator while keeping the transection stump of the liver dry. Particularly, the extracorporeal Pringle maneuver using cotton tape is simple and convenient and can be carried out within a short amount of time.
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic hepatic resection (LHR) has been developed as a novel minimally invasive surgery. However, despite improvements in equipment and procedures, intraoperative hemorrhage remains an issue that requires great precaution. To reduce the amount of intraoperative blood loss, we perform the Pringle maneuver, aimed at occluding the inflow of blood into the liver during LHR. This article describes our experience performing LHR using the Pringle maneuver, including postoperative results, and discusses the safety and effectiveness of the Pringle maneuver. METHODS: Data from 83 patients who underwent laparoscopic partial right hepatic resection with or without the Pringle maneuver were retrospectively analyzed with respect to surgical outcomes, safety, and utility. RESULTS: In LHR, the amount of bleeding was significantly lower in cases that included the Pringle maneuver (P = .0314). However, there were no differences in the duration of surgery, surgical margin, rate of curative resections, and incidence of postoperative complications. Laboratory data collected after surgery showed no significant difference between the two groups regardless of whether blood flow was occluded or not. CONCLUSIONS: The Pringle maneuver may be effective in reducing the amount of intraoperative blood loss during laparoscopic partial right hepatic resection, although the difference is not clinically significant. Rather, the reduction in bleeding can reduce the stress experienced by the operator while keeping the transection stump of the liver dry. Particularly, the extracorporeal Pringle maneuver using cotton tape is simple and convenient and can be carried out within a short amount of time.