Kasey B Jackman1, Curtis Dolezal2, Walter O Bockting1,2. 1. 1 School of Nursing, Program for the Study of LGBT Health, Columbia University , New York, New York. 2. 2 Division of Gender, Sexuality, and Health, New York State Psychiatric Institute/Columbia University Department of Psychiatry , New York, New York.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study examined internalized transnegativity and psychological distress in two age groups of transgender individuals who identified their gender identity on the feminine spectrum (rather than congruent with their male sex assigned at birth). Due to greater visibility and acceptance of gender diversity in the United States, we hypothesized that internalized transnegativity would be lower in the younger compared with the older group, and that the younger generation would, therefore, report lower levels of psychological distress than the older generation. METHODS: The study sample consisted of trans-feminine individuals (N = 440) who completed a online survey of the U.S. transgender population and comprised a younger group aged 18-24 years (n = 133) and an older group aged 40 years and older (n = 307). Internalized transnegativity was assessed using the Transgender Identity Survey, and psychological distress was assessed with the Brief Symptom Inventory 18. We used regression and mediation analysis to examine differences between the two groups. RESULTS: Contrary to our expectations, the older group reported significantly lower levels of both internalized transnegativity and psychological distress compared with the younger group. Internalized transnegativity partially mediated the relationship between age group and psychological distress. CONCLUSION: Despite greater visibility of transgender people and increasing acceptance of gender diversity in the United States, the younger trans-feminine individuals reported more psychological distress than the older transfeminine individuals, which was, in part, related to internalized transnegativity. Trans-feminine individuals may benefit from culturally sensitive and clinically competent mental health services to alleviate internalized transnegativity and psychological distress.
PURPOSE: This study examined internalized transnegativity and psychological distress in two age groups of transgender individuals who identified their gender identity on the feminine spectrum (rather than congruent with their male sex assigned at birth). Due to greater visibility and acceptance of gender diversity in the United States, we hypothesized that internalized transnegativity would be lower in the younger compared with the older group, and that the younger generation would, therefore, report lower levels of psychological distress than the older generation. METHODS: The study sample consisted of trans-feminine individuals (N = 440) who completed a online survey of the U.S. transgender population and comprised a younger group aged 18-24 years (n = 133) and an older group aged 40 years and older (n = 307). Internalized transnegativity was assessed using the Transgender Identity Survey, and psychological distress was assessed with the Brief Symptom Inventory 18. We used regression and mediation analysis to examine differences between the two groups. RESULTS: Contrary to our expectations, the older group reported significantly lower levels of both internalized transnegativity and psychological distress compared with the younger group. Internalized transnegativity partially mediated the relationship between age group and psychological distress. CONCLUSION: Despite greater visibility of transgender people and increasing acceptance of gender diversity in the United States, the younger trans-feminine individuals reported more psychological distress than the older transfeminine individuals, which was, in part, related to internalized transnegativity. Trans-feminine individuals may benefit from culturally sensitive and clinically competent mental health services to alleviate internalized transnegativity and psychological distress.
Authors: Madison Aitken; Thomas D Steensma; Ray Blanchard; Doug P VanderLaan; Hayley Wood; Amanda Fuentes; Cathy Spegg; Lori Wasserman; Megan Ames; C Lindsay Fitzsimmons; Jonathan H Leef; Victoria Lishak; Elyse Reim; Anna Takagi; Julia Vinik; Julia Wreford; Peggy T Cohen-Kettenis; Annelou L C de Vries; Baudewijntje P C Kreukels; Kenneth J Zucker Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2015-01-22 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Ilan H Meyer; Taylor N T Brown; Jody L Herman; Sari L Reisner; Walter O Bockting Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2017-02-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Walter O Bockting; Michael H Miner; Rebecca E Swinburne Romine; Autumn Hamilton; Eli Coleman Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Walter O Bockting; Michael H Miner; Rebecca E Swinburne Romine; Curtis Dolezal; Beatrice Bean E Robinson; B R Simon Rosser; Eli Coleman Journal: LGBT Health Date: 2019-12-24 Impact factor: 4.151
Authors: Hyemin Lee; Kevin K Tomita; Janice M Habarth; Don Operario; Horim Yi; Sungsub Choo; Seung-Sup Kim Journal: Int J Transgend Health Date: 2020-04-11
Authors: Kyle K H Tan; Sonja J Ellis; Johanna M Schmidt; Jack L Byrne; Jaimie F Veale Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Marc Inderbinen; Kristin Schaefer; Andres Schneeberger; Jens Gaab; David Garcia Nuñez Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2021-05-20 Impact factor: 4.157