Literature DB >> 29099311

A comparative study of sequence- and structure-based features of small RNAs and other RNAs of bacteria.

Amita Barik1, Santasabuj Das1,2.   

Abstract

Small RNAs (sRNAs) in bacteria have emerged as key players in transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. Here, we present a statistical analysis of different sequence- and structure-related features of bacterial sRNAs to identify the descriptors that could discriminate sRNAs from other bacterial RNAs. We investigated a comprehensive and heterogeneous collection of 816 sRNAs, identified by northern blotting across 33 bacterial species and compared their various features with other classes of bacterial RNAs, such as tRNAs, rRNAs and mRNAs. We observed that sRNAs differed significantly from the rest with respect to G+C composition, normalized minimum free energy of folding, motif frequency and several RNA-folding parameters like base-pairing propensity, Shannon entropy and base-pair distance. Based on the selected features, we developed a predictive model using Random Forests (RF) method to classify the above four classes of RNAs. Our model displayed an overall predictive accuracy of 89.5%. These findings would help to differentiate bacterial sRNAs from other RNAs and further promote prediction of novel sRNAs in different bacterial species.

Keywords:  Base-pairing propensity; base-pair distance; minimum free energy of folding; motifs; random forests; shannon entropy; small RNAs

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29099311      PMCID: PMC5785981          DOI: 10.1080/15476286.2017.1387709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  RNA Biol        ISSN: 1547-6286            Impact factor:   4.652


  61 in total

1.  Secondary structure alone is generally not statistically significant for the detection of noncoding RNAs.

Authors:  E Rivas; S R Eddy
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  A computational approach to identify genes for functional RNAs in genomic sequences.

Authors:  R J Carter; I Dubchak; S R Holbrook
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Correlations between genomic GC levels and optimal growth temperatures in prokaryotes.

Authors:  Héctor Musto; Hugo Naya; Alejandro Zavala; Héctor Romero; Fernando Alvarez-Valín; Giorgio Bernardi
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2004-08-27       Impact factor: 4.124

4.  LocARNA-P: accurate boundary prediction and improved detection of structural RNAs.

Authors:  Sebastian Will; Tejal Joshi; Ivo L Hofacker; Peter F Stadler; Rolf Backofen
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 4.942

Review 5.  Hfq structure, function and ligand binding.

Authors:  Richard G Brennan; Todd M Link
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 7.934

6.  Relationships between genomic G+C content, RNA secondary structures, and optimal growth temperature in prokaryotes.

Authors:  N Galtier; J R Lobry
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  A network of heterogeneous hydrogen bonds in GNRA tetraloops.

Authors:  F M Jucker; H A Heus; P F Yip; E H Moors; A Pardi
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-12-20       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Noncoding RNA genes identified in AT-rich hyperthermophiles.

Authors:  Robert J Klein; Ziva Misulovin; Sean R Eddy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  How to find small non-coding RNAs in bacteria.

Authors:  Jörg Vogel; Cynthia Mira Sharma
Journal:  Biol Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.915

10.  Defining a role for Hfq in Gram-positive bacteria: evidence for Hfq-dependent antisense regulation in Listeria monocytogenes.

Authors:  Jesper Sejrup Nielsen; Lisbeth Kristensen Lei; Tine Ebersbach; Anders Steno Olsen; Janne Kudsk Klitgaard; Poul Valentin-Hansen; Birgitte Haahr Kallipolitis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  3 in total

1.  BioAutoML: automated feature engineering and metalearning to predict noncoding RNAs in bacteria.

Authors:  Robson P Bonidia; Anderson P Avila Santos; Breno L S de Almeida; Peter F Stadler; Ulisses N da Rocha; Danilo S Sanches; André C P L F de Carvalho
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 13.994

2.  Changes in Aphid Host Plant Diet Influence the Small-RNA Expression Profiles of Its Obligate Nutritional Symbiont, Buchnera.

Authors:  Margaret W Thairu; Allison K Hansen
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 7.867

3.  The intergenic small non-coding RNA ittA is required for optimal infectivity and tissue tropism in Borrelia burgdorferi.

Authors:  Diana N Medina-Pérez; Beau Wager; Erin Troy; Lihui Gao; Steven J Norris; Tao Lin; Linden Hu; Jenny A Hyde; Meghan Lybecker; Jon T Skare
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 6.823

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.