Literature DB >> 29099150

Expanded carrier screening in gamete donors of Venezuela.

Maria Teresa Urbina1, Isaac Benjamin1, Randolfo Medina1, José Jiménez1, Laura Trías1, Jorge Lerner1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the implications of expanded genetic carrier screening for preconception purposes based on our practice.
METHODS: One hundred and forty-three potential gamete donors aged 20-32 years old (µ=24, 127 females and 16 males), signed informed consent forms and were selected according to the REDLARA guidelines. Blood or saliva samples were examined by one of these genetic carrier screening methods: Genzyme screening for Cystic Fibrosis (CF), Fragile X and Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA); Counsyl Universal panel or Recombine Carrier Map.
RESULTS: Genotyping results for all donors were analyzed; 41% (58/143) of donors were identified as carriers for at least one condition. We found a carrier frequency of 1/24 for CF, 1/72 for SMA and 0/120 for Fragile X syndrome. Among the high-impact most prevalent conditions in our study (Carrier Map group) were: 21-Hydroxilase-Deficient Congenital Nonclassical Adrenal Hyperplasia (1/8), Factor V deficiency (1/12), Hemochromatosis: Type 1: HFE Related (1/12), Short Chain Acyl-CoA (1/14) and MTHFR deficiency 1/3 (39%).
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of gamete donors identified as carriers of at least one condition was 41%, which supports the offering of expanded carrier screening to our population. Studies in Latin American populations could help customize screening panels. The ART patient population has a unique opportunity to be offered expanded carrier screening and appropriate counseling, to make its best-informed decisions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CF; Expanded carrier screening; SMA

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29099150      PMCID: PMC5714605          DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20170062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod        ISSN: 1517-5693


  17 in total

1.  A universal carrier test for the long tail of Mendelian disease.

Authors:  Balaji S Srinivasan; Eric A Evans; Jason Flannick; A Scott Patterson; Christopher C Chang; Tuan Pham; Sharon Young; Amit Kaushal; James Lee; Jessica L Jacobson; Pasquale Patrizio
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 2.  Can we make assumptions about the psychosocial impact of living as a carrier, based on studies assessing the effects of carrier testing?

Authors:  Celine Lewis; Heather Skirton; Ray Jones
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Expanded carrier screening in reproductive medicine-points to consider: a joint statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, National Society of Genetic Counselors, Perinatal Quality Foundation, and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine.

Authors:  Janice G Edwards; Gerald Feldman; James Goldberg; Anthony R Gregg; Mary E Norton; Nancy C Rose; Adele Schneider; Katie Stoll; Ronald Wapner; Michael S Watson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Committee Opinion No. 690 Summary: Carrier Screening in the Age of Genomic Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) after conception using gametes from anonymous donors: recommendations for the future.

Authors:  Pamela Callum; Maria Teresa Urbina; Rena E Falk; Jorge A Alvarez-Diaz; Isaac Benjamin; Charles A Sims
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  An empirical estimate of carrier frequencies for 400+ causal Mendelian variants: results from an ethnically diverse clinical sample of 23,453 individuals.

Authors:  Gabriel A Lazarin; Imran S Haque; Shivani Nazareth; Kevin Iori; A Scott Patterson; Jessica L Jacobson; John R Marshall; William K Seltzer; Pasquale Patrizio; Eric A Evans; Balaji S Srinivasan
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Expanded carrier screening in an infertile population: how often is clinical decision making affected?

Authors:  Jason M Franasiak; Meir Olcha; Paul A Bergh; Kathleen H Hong; Marie D Werner; Eric J Forman; Rebekah S Zimmerman; Richard T Scott
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  ACMG position statement on prenatal/preconception expanded carrier screening.

Authors:  Wayne W Grody; Barry H Thompson; Anthony R Gregg; Lora H Bean; Kristin G Monaghan; Adele Schneider; Roger V Lebo
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Systematic Classification of Disease Severity for Evaluation of Expanded Carrier Screening Panels.

Authors:  Gabriel A Lazarin; Felicia Hawthorne; Nicholas S Collins; Elizabeth A Platt; Eric A Evans; Imran S Haque
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Response to Stoll and Resta.

Authors:  Gabriel A Lazarin; Imran S Haque; Shivani Nazareth; Eric A Evans
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The use of expanded carrier screening of gamete donors.

Authors:  Molly R Payne; Anne-Bine Skytte; Joyce C Harper
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.353

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.