Igor Snast1, Ofer Reiter1, Emmilia Hodak1,2, Rivka Friedland3, Daniel Mimouni4,5, Yael Anne Leshem1,2. 1. Department of Dermatology, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, 4941492, Petah Tikva, Israel. 2. Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 6997801, Tel Aviv, Israel. 3. Schneider Children's Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel. 4. Department of Dermatology, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, 4941492, Petah Tikva, Israel. daniel.mimouni@gmail.com. 5. Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 6997801, Tel Aviv, Israel. daniel.mimouni@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD) offer limited efficacy and are often restricted by safety concerns. Biologics may address the unmet need for improved AD therapeutics. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of biologic agents in AD. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating AD patients treated with biologics was performed. The primary outcome was the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI)-75 response, while secondary outcomes were SCOring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD)-75, EASI-50, SCORAD-50, Investigator Global Assessment 0/1 responses, change in responses from baseline, and adverse events. RESULTS: We included 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 10 observational studies evaluating nine biologics. High-quality evidence was available for dupilumab, nemolizumab and ustekinumab. Pooling five studies, at weeks 12-16 dupilumab 300 mg every week to every 2 weeks achieved EASI-75 responses of 55%, superior to placebo [relative risk (RR) 3.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9-3.6]. Nemolizumab had similar EASI-75 responses as placebo, but significantly improved pruritus. In online reports, lebrikizumab demonstrated superior EASI-50 responses versus placebo (RR 1.3, 95% CI 1.04-1.7), while tralokinumab had superior SCORAD-50 responses versus placebo, with borderline significance (RR 1.7, 95% CI 0.97-3.1). In two RCTs each, omalizumab and ustekinumab were comparable with placebo, while antithymic stromal lymphopoietin receptor, infliximab, and rituximab lacked adequate evidence of efficacy. All medications had a comparable safety profile to placebo. LIMITATIONS: Lack of RCTs and the use of variable outcome measures limited conclusions. CONCLUSION: Dupilumab is currently the only biologic with robust evidence of efficacy in AD. Nemolizumab, lebrikizumab, and tralokinumab show promise but further data are needed. Longer follow-up and larger studies will establish their safety profile.
BACKGROUND: Current systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD) offer limited efficacy and are often restricted by safety concerns. Biologics may address the unmet need for improved AD therapeutics. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of biologic agents in AD. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating ADpatients treated with biologics was performed. The primary outcome was the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI)-75 response, while secondary outcomes were SCOring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD)-75, EASI-50, SCORAD-50, Investigator Global Assessment 0/1 responses, change in responses from baseline, and adverse events. RESULTS: We included 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 10 observational studies evaluating nine biologics. High-quality evidence was available for dupilumab, nemolizumab and ustekinumab. Pooling five studies, at weeks 12-16 dupilumab 300 mg every week to every 2 weeks achieved EASI-75 responses of 55%, superior to placebo [relative risk (RR) 3.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9-3.6]. Nemolizumab had similar EASI-75 responses as placebo, but significantly improved pruritus. In online reports, lebrikizumab demonstrated superior EASI-50 responses versus placebo (RR 1.3, 95% CI 1.04-1.7), while tralokinumab had superior SCORAD-50 responses versus placebo, with borderline significance (RR 1.7, 95% CI 0.97-3.1). In two RCTs each, omalizumab and ustekinumab were comparable with placebo, while antithymic stromal lymphopoietin receptor, infliximab, and rituximab lacked adequate evidence of efficacy. All medications had a comparable safety profile to placebo. LIMITATIONS: Lack of RCTs and the use of variable outcome measures limited conclusions. CONCLUSION:Dupilumab is currently the only biologic with robust evidence of efficacy in AD. Nemolizumab, lebrikizumab, and tralokinumab show promise but further data are needed. Longer follow-up and larger studies will establish their safety profile.
Authors: Eustachio Nettis; Luisa Brussino; Vincenzo Patella; Laura Bonzano; Aikaterini Detoraki; Elisabetta Di Leo; Maria Maddalena Sirufo; Cristiano Caruso; Fabio Lodi Rizzini; Mariaelisabetta Conte; Mona-Rita Yacoub; Massimo Triggiani; Erminia Ridolo; Luigi Macchia; Giovanni Rolla; Raffaele Brancaccio; Amato De Paulis; Giuseppe Spadaro; Danilo Di Bona; Angela Maria D'Uggento; Lia Ginaldi; Francesco Gaeta; Eleonora Nucera; Kliljeda Jaubashi; Danilo Villalta; Lorenzo Dagna; Domenico Ciotta; Francesco Pucciarini; Diego Bagnasco; Giorgio Celi; Fulvia Chieco Bianchi; Lorenzo Cosmi; Maria Teresa Costantino; Maria Angiola Crivellaro; Simona D'Alò; Pietro Del Biondo; Stefano Del Giacco; Mario Di Gioacchino; Linda Di Pietro; Elisabetta Favero; Sebastiano Gangemi; Gabriella Guarnieri; Enrico Heffler; Maria Stefania Leto Barone; Carla Lombardo; Francesca Losa; Andrea Matucci; Paola Lucia Minciullo; Paola Parronchi; Giovanni Passalacqua; Stefano Pucci; Oliviero Rossi; Lorenzo Salvati; Michele Schiappoli; Gianenrico Senna; Andrea Vianello; Alessandra Vultaggio; Yang Baoran; Cristoforo Incorvaia; Giorgio Walter Canonica Journal: Clin Mol Allergy Date: 2022-05-19
Authors: Ian A Myles; Noah J Earland; Erik D Anderson; Ian N Moore; Mark D Kieh; Kelli W Williams; Arhum Saleem; Natalia M Fontecilla; Pamela A Welch; Dirk A Darnell; Lisa A Barnhart; Ashleigh A Sun; Gulbu Uzel; Sandip K Datta Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2018-05-03
Authors: Marissa T Ayasse; Adnan Ahmed; Maria L Espinosa; Christina J Walker; Muhammad Yousaf; Jacob P Thyssen; Jonathan I Silverberg Journal: Arch Dermatol Res Date: 2020-11-22 Impact factor: 3.017
Authors: Stephanie J Lax; Jane Harvey; Emma Axon; Laura Howells; Miriam Santer; Matthew J Ridd; Sandra Lawton; Sinéad Langan; Amanda Roberts; Amina Ahmed; Ingrid Muller; Long Chiau Ming; Saumya Panda; Pavel Chernyshov; Ben Carter; Hywel C Williams; Kim S Thomas; Joanne R Chalmers Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2022-03-11
Authors: J I Silverberg; D Lei; M Yousaf; S R Janmohamed; P P Vakharia; R Chopra; R Chavda; S Gabriel; K R Patel; V Singam; R Kantor; D Y Hsu Journal: Br J Dermatol Date: 2020-09-21 Impact factor: 9.302