Ponnie R Dolo1, Libin Yao1, Chao Li1, Xiaocheng Zhu2, Linsen Shi1, Jason Widjaja1. 1. Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221006, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221006, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China. zhuxccf@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Possible mechanisms underlying diabetes remission following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) include eradication of putative factor(s) with duodenal-jejunal bypass. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to observe the effects of duodenal-jejunal transit on glucose tolerance and diabetes remission in gastric bypass rat model. METHOD: In order to verify the effect of duodenal-jejunal transit on glucose tolerance and diabetes remission in gastric bypass, 22 type 2 diabetes Sprague-Dawley rat models established through high-fat diet and low-dose streptozotocin (STZ) administered intraperitoneally were assigned to one of three groups: gastric bypass with duodenal-jejunal transit (GB-DJT n = 8), gastric bypass without duodenal-jejunal transit (RYGB n = 8), and sham (n = 6). Body weight, food intake, blood glucose, as well as meal-stimulated insulin, and incretin hormone responses were assessed to ascertain the effect of surgery in all groups. Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and insulin tolerance test (ITT) were conducted three and 7 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: Comparing our GB-DJT to the RYGB group, we saw no differences in the mean decline in body weight, food intake, and blood glucose 8 weeks after surgery. GB-DJT group exhibited immediate and sustained glucose control throughout the study. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) levels were also significantly increased from preoperative level in the GB-DJT group (p < 0.05). Insulin and GLP-1 area under curve (AUC) as well as improved glycemic excursion on OGTT did not differ between GB-DJT and RYGB groups. Outcomes with sham operation did not differ from preoperative level. CONCLUSION: Preserving duodenal-jejunal transit does not impede glucose tolerance and diabetes remission after gastric bypass in type-2 diabetes Sprague-Dawley rat model.
BACKGROUND: Possible mechanisms underlying diabetes remission following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) include eradication of putative factor(s) with duodenal-jejunal bypass. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to observe the effects of duodenal-jejunal transit on glucose tolerance and diabetes remission in gastric bypass rat model. METHOD: In order to verify the effect of duodenal-jejunal transit on glucose tolerance and diabetes remission in gastric bypass, 22 type 2 diabetesSprague-Dawley rat models established through high-fat diet and low-dose streptozotocin (STZ) administered intraperitoneally were assigned to one of three groups: gastric bypass with duodenal-jejunal transit (GB-DJT n = 8), gastric bypass without duodenal-jejunal transit (RYGB n = 8), and sham (n = 6). Body weight, food intake, blood glucose, as well as meal-stimulated insulin, and incretin hormone responses were assessed to ascertain the effect of surgery in all groups. Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and insulin tolerance test (ITT) were conducted three and 7 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: Comparing our GB-DJT to the RYGB group, we saw no differences in the mean decline in body weight, food intake, and blood glucose 8 weeks after surgery. GB-DJT group exhibited immediate and sustained glucose control throughout the study. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) levels were also significantly increased from preoperative level in the GB-DJT group (p < 0.05). Insulin and GLP-1 area under curve (AUC) as well as improved glycemic excursion on OGTT did not differ between GB-DJT and RYGB groups. Outcomes with sham operation did not differ from preoperative level. CONCLUSION: Preserving duodenal-jejunal transit does not impede glucose tolerance and diabetes remission after gastric bypass in type-2 diabetesSprague-Dawley rat model.
Authors: C Dirksen; N B Jørgensen; K N Bojsen-Møller; S H Jacobsen; D L Hansen; D Worm; J J Holst; S Madsbad Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: N B Jørgensen; S H Jacobsen; C Dirksen; K N Bojsen-Møller; L Naver; L Hvolris; T R Clausen; B S Wulff; D Worm; D Lindqvist Hansen; S Madsbad; J J Holst Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2012-04-24 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Philip R Schauer; Deepak L Bhatt; John P Kirwan; Kathy Wolski; Stacy A Brethauer; Sankar D Navaneethan; Ali Aminian; Claire E Pothier; Esther S H Kim; Steven E Nissen; Sangeeta R Kashyap Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-03-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alberto Patriti; Maria Cristina Aisa; Claudia Annetti; Angelo Sidoni; Francesco Galli; Ivana Ferri; Nino Gullà; Annibale Donini Journal: Surgery Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 3.982