Literature DB >> 29098379

Influence of hydrostatic pressure on intracoronary indices of stenosis severity in vivo.

Tobias Härle1, Mareike Luz2, Sven Meyer2, Felix Vahldiek2, Pim van der Harst3,4, Randy van Dijk3,4, Daan Ties3,4, Javier Escaned5, Justin Davies6, Albrecht Elsässer2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An influence of hydrostatic pressure on intracoronary indices of stenosis severity in vitro was recently reported. We sought to analyze the influence of hydrostatic pressure, caused by the height difference between the distal and proximal pressure sensor after guidewire positioning in the interrogated vessel, on intracoronary pressure measurements in vivo. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In 30 coronary stenoses, intracoronary pressure measurements were performed in supine, left, and right lateral patient position. Height differences between the distal and proximal pressure sensor were measured by blinded observers. Measurement results of the position with the highest ("high") and lowest height difference ("low") were compared. In group "high", all measured indices were higher: mean difference of fractional flow reserve (FFR) 0.045 (SD 0.033, 95% CI 0.033-0.057, p < 0.0001), of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) 0.043 (SD 0.04, 95% CI 0.029-0.057, p < 0.0001), and of resting Pd/Pa 0.037 (SD 0.034, 95% CI 0.025-0.049, p < 0.0001). Addition of the physically expectable hydrostatic pressure to the distal coronary pressures of the control group abolished the differences: corrected ∆FFR - 0.006 (SD 0.027, 95% CI - 0.015 to 0.004, p = 0.26), corrected ∆Pd/Pa - 0.008 (SD 0.03, 95% CI - 0.019 to 0.003, p = 0.18). Adjustment for hydrostatic pressure of FFR values in a standard supine position increased all values in anterior vessels and decreased all values in posterior vessels. The mean changes of FFR due to adjustment were: LAD - 0.048 (SD 0.016), CX 0.02 (SD 0.009), RCA 0.02 (SD 0.021). Dichotomous severity classification changed in 12.9% of stenoses.
CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates a relevant influence of hydrostatic pressure on intracoronary indices of stenosis severity in vivo, caused by the height differences between distal and proximal pressure sensor.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FFR; Fractional flow reserve; Instantaneous wave-free ratio; Patient position; iFR

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29098379     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-017-1174-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol        ISSN: 1861-0684            Impact factor:   5.460


  20 in total

1.  Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation) study.

Authors:  Sayan Sen; Javier Escaned; Iqbal S Malik; Ghada W Mikhail; Rodney A Foale; Rafael Mila; Jason Tarkin; Ricardo Petraco; Christopher Broyd; Richard Jabbour; Amarjit Sethi; Christopher S Baker; Micheal Bellamy; Mahmud Al-Bustami; David Hackett; Masood Khan; David Lefroy; Kim H Parker; Alun D Hughes; Darrel P Francis; Carlo Di Mario; Jamil Mayet; Justin E Davies
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Impact of right atrial pressure on decision-making using fractional flow reserve (FFR) in elective percutaneous intervention.

Authors:  Jamie Layland; Andrew M Wilson; Robert J Whitbourn; Andrew T Burns; Jithendra Somaratne; George Leitl; Andrew I Macisaac
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.

Authors:  William Wijns; Philippe Kolh; Nicolas Danchin; Carlo Di Mario; Volkmar Falk; Thierry Folliguet; Scot Garg; Kurt Huber; Stefan James; Juhani Knuuti; Jose Lopez-Sendon; Jean Marco; Lorenzo Menicanti; Miodrag Ostojic; Massimo F Piepoli; Charles Pirlet; Jose L Pomar; Nicolaus Reifart; Flavio L Ribichini; Martin J Schalij; Paul Sergeant; Patrick W Serruys; Sigmund Silber; Miguel Sousa Uva; David Taggart
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-08-29       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  The impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on fractional flow reserve: Insights from the FAME (Fractional flow reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) trial.

Authors:  Yuhei Kobayashi; Pim A L Tonino; Bernard De Bruyne; Hyoung-Mo Yang; Hong-Seok Lim; Nico H J Pijls; William F Fearon
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 4.164

5.  Differences between automatically detected and steady-state fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Tobias Härle; Sven Meyer; Felix Vahldiek; Albrecht Elsässer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  Comparison of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR)--first real world experience.

Authors:  Tobias Härle; Waldemar Bojara; Sven Meyer; Albrecht Elsässer
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 4.164

7.  Method of high-precision microsample blood and plasma mass densitometry.

Authors:  H Hinghofer-Szalkay
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1986-03

8.  Volume and density changes of biological fluids with temperature.

Authors:  H Hinghofer-Szalkay
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1985-12

9.  Continuous monitoring of blood volume changes in humans.

Authors:  H Hinghofer-Szalkay; J E Greenleaf
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1987-09

10.  Classification performance of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve in a clinical population of intermediate coronary stenoses: results of the ADVISE registry.

Authors:  Ricardo Petraco; Javier Escaned; Sayan Sen; Sukhjinder Nijjer; Kaleab N Asrress; Mauro Echavarria-Pinto; Tim Lockie; Muhammed Z Khawaja; Cecilia Cuevas; Nicolas Foin; Christopher Broyd; Rodney A Foale; Nearchos Hadjiloizou; Iqbal S Malik; Ghada W Mikhail; Amarjit Sethi; Raffi Kaprielian; Christopher S Baker; David Lefroy; Michael Bellamy; Mahmud Al-Bustami; Masood A Khan; Alun D Hughes; Darrel P Francis; Jamil Mayet; Carlo Di Mario; Simon Redwood; Justin E Davies
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 6.534

View more
  4 in total

1.  Coronary artery height differences and their effect on fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Firas Al-Janabi; Grigoris Karamasis; Chritopher M Cook; Alamgir M Kabir; Rohan O Jagathesan; Nicholas M Robinson; Jeremy W Sayer; Rajesh K Aggarwal; Gerald J Clesham; Paul R Kelly; Reto A Gamma; Kare H Tang; Thomas R Keeble; John R Davies
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 2.737

2.  Impact of Hydrostatic Pressure Variations Caused by Height Differences in Supine and Prone Positions on Fractional Flow Reserve Values in the Coronary Circulation.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Kawaguchi; Kazuki Ito; Humihiko Kin; Yusuke Shirai; Ayako Okazaki; Keisuke Miyajima; Tomoyuki Watanabe; Mariko Tatsuguchi; Yasushi Wakabayashi; Yuichiro Maekawa
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Bacterial biofilms in infective endocarditis: an in vitro model to investigate emerging technologies of antimicrobial cardiovascular device coatings.

Authors:  Alexander Lauten; Marc Martinović; Laura Kursawe; Judith Kikhney; Klaus Affeld; Ulrich Kertzscher; Volkmar Falk; Annette Moter
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  The impact of hydrostatic pressure on the result of physiological measurements in various coronary segments.

Authors:  Áron Üveges; Balázs Tar; Csaba Jenei; Dániel Czuriga; Zoltán Papp; Zoltán Csanádi; Zsolt Kőszegi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 2.357

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.