| Literature DB >> 29097988 |
Sigal Tal1,2, Amir Hadanny1,3,4, Efrat Sasson5, Gil Suzin3, Shai Efrati1,3,6,7.
Abstract
Background: Recent clinical studies in stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI) victims suffering chronic neurological injury present evidence that hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) can induce neuroplasticity. Objective: To assess the neurotherapeutic effect of HBOT on prolonged post-concussion syndrome (PPCS) due to TBI, using brain microstructure imaging.Entities:
Keywords: DTI; MRI; TBI; angiogenesis; hyperbaric oxygen; perfusion; post-concussion; tractography
Year: 2017 PMID: 29097988 PMCID: PMC5654341 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00508
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Hum Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5161 Impact factor: 3.169
Patients' baseline characteristic.
| 35.8 ± 3.5 | ||
| Males | 8 (53.3%) | |
| Females | 7 (46.7%) | |
| 6.7 ± 2.1 | ||
| Mild | 8 (53.3%) | |
| Moderate | 2 (13.3%) | |
| Severe | 5 (33.4%) | |
| MVA | 13 (86.7%) | |
| Fall | 1 (6.7%) | |
| Assault | 1 (6.7%) | |
| SSRI | 3 (20%) | |
| Benzodiazepines | 1 (6.7%) | |
| Opiates | 2 (13.3%) |
Figure 1Cognitive indices relative changes post HBOT. Relative change in the corresponding cognitive indices after HBOT. Relative change was calculated by (post HBOT-pre HBOT)/Pre HBOT. IPS, Information processing speed. *p < 0.05.
Cognitive indices at baseline, and after Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT).
| Global | 88.2 ± 2.5 | 96.4 ± 2.5 | 8.2 ± 1.5 | * | |
| Memory | 82.2 ± 5.3 | 92.7 ± 4.7 | 10.5 ± 2.4 | * | |
| Executive Functions | 83.9 ± 3.8 | 95.2 ± 3.4 | 11.3 ± 2.7 | * | |
| Attention | 88.1 ± 3.5 | 96.3 ± 2.9 | 8.2 ± 4.0 | 0.062 | 0.105 |
| IPS | 84.3 ± 3.3 | 97.4 ± 3.8 | 13.1 ± 2.7 | * | |
| VSP | 96.6 ± 4.0 | 105.3 ± 3.1 | 8.7 ± 3.0 | * | |
| Motor skills | 92.3 ± 4.1 | 98.2 ± 3.8 | 5.8 ± 2.0 | * |
Data are expressed as means ± standard errors. IPS, Information processing speed; VSP, Visual spatial processing; W, Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Bold values indicated Statistically significant p < 0.05.
Figure 2Average DTI normalized delta change in FA maps. Yellow and red areas show a statistically significant increase in FA (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Average DTI normalized delta change in MD maps. Blue areas mark statistically significant decrease in MD (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Graphs of FA and MD averages and standard error in statistically significant clusters. (A) Averages of FA before and after HBOT. (B) Normalized delta of FA maps. (C) Averages of MD before and after HBOT. (D) Normalized delta of MD maps.
Figure 5White matter tractography change in a single patient. (A) Fibers number increase in the right ILF tract. (B) Fibers number increase in the left IFOF tract. (C) Fibers increase in the right Uncinate tract.
Figure 6Graphs of CBF and CBV averages and standard error in statistically significant clusters. (A) Averages of CBF before and after HBOT. (B) Averages of CBV before and after HBOT.
Figure 7Changes in brain perfusion (CBF and CBV) post HBOT. (A) Average DSC maps pre and post HBOT and DSC normalized delta maps. Top row: CBF and CBV pre-HBOT. Middle row: CBF and CBV maps post-HBOT. Bottom row: normalized delta maps, showing diffuse increases in CBF and CBV post-HBOT. (B) Significant CBF and CBV normalized delta changes post HBOT. Areas of maximal statistically significant increase in perfusion.