Kalani L Raphael1,2, Sarah Gilligan3, Joachim H Ix4,5,6. 1. Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah; kalani.raphael@hsc.utah.edu. 2. Nephrology Section, Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah. 3. Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah. 4. Division of Nephrology-Hypertension, Department of Medicine and. 5. Nephrology Section, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California. 6. Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, California; and.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Low urine ammonium excretion is associated with ESRD in CKD. Few laboratories measure urine ammonium, limiting clinical application. We determined correlations between urine ammonium, the standard urine anion gap, and a modified urine anion gap that includes sulfate and phosphate and compared risks of ESRD or death between these ammonium estimates and directly measured ammonium. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We measured ammonium, sodium, potassium, chloride, phosphate, and sulfate from baseline 24-hour urine collections in 1044 African-American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension participants. We evaluated the cross-sectional correlations between urine ammonium, the standard urine anion gap (sodium + potassium - chloride), and a modified urine anion gap that includes urine phosphate and sulfate in the calculation. Multivariable-adjusted Cox models determined the associations of the standard urine anion gap and the modified urine anion gap with the composite end point of death or ESRD; these results were compared with results using urine ammonium as the predictor of interest. RESULTS: The standard urine anion gap had a weak and direct correlation with urine ammonium (r=0.18), whereas the modified urine anion gap had a modest inverse relationship with urine ammonium (r=-0.58). Compared with the highest tertile of urine ammonium, those in the lowest urine ammonium tertile had higher risk of ESRD or death (hazard ratio, 1.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.87) after adjusting for demographics, GFR, proteinuria, and other confounders. In comparison, participants in the corresponding standard urine anion gap tertile did not have higher risk of ESRD or death (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.64 to 1.07), whereas the risk for those in the corresponding modified urine anion gap tertile (hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 1.68) approximated that of directly measured urine ammonium. CONCLUSIONS: Urine anion gap is a poor surrogate of urine ammonium in CKD unless phosphate and sulfate are included in the calculation. Because the modified urine anion gap merely estimates urine ammonium and requires five measurements, direct measurements of urine ammonium are preferable in CKD.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Low urine ammonium excretion is associated with ESRD in CKD. Few laboratories measure urine ammonium, limiting clinical application. We determined correlations between urine ammonium, the standard urine anion gap, and a modified urine anion gap that includes sulfate and phosphate and compared risks of ESRD or death between these ammonium estimates and directly measured ammonium. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We measured ammonium, sodium, potassium, chloride, phosphate, and sulfate from baseline 24-hour urine collections in 1044 African-American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertensionparticipants. We evaluated the cross-sectional correlations between urine ammonium, the standard urine anion gap (sodium + potassium - chloride), and a modified urine anion gap that includes urine phosphate and sulfate in the calculation. Multivariable-adjusted Cox models determined the associations of the standard urine anion gap and the modified urine anion gap with the composite end point of death or ESRD; these results were compared with results using urine ammonium as the predictor of interest. RESULTS: The standard urine anion gap had a weak and direct correlation with urine ammonium (r=0.18), whereas the modified urine anion gap had a modest inverse relationship with urine ammonium (r=-0.58). Compared with the highest tertile of urine ammonium, those in the lowest urine ammonium tertile had higher risk of ESRD or death (hazard ratio, 1.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.87) after adjusting for demographics, GFR, proteinuria, and other confounders. In comparison, participants in the corresponding standard urine anion gap tertile did not have higher risk of ESRD or death (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.64 to 1.07), whereas the risk for those in the corresponding modified urine anion gap tertile (hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 1.68) approximated that of directly measured urine ammonium. CONCLUSIONS: Urine anion gap is a poor surrogate of urine ammonium in CKD unless phosphate and sulfate are included in the calculation. Because the modified urine anion gap merely estimates urine ammonium and requires five measurements, direct measurements of urine ammonium are preferable in CKD.
Authors: Leonard Goldenstein; Todd H Driver; Linda F Fried; Dena E Rifkin; Kushang V Patel; Robert H Yenchek; Tamara B Harris; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Anne B Newman; Mark J Sarnak; Michael G Shlipak; Joachim H Ix Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2014-06-18 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Julia J Scialla; John Asplin; Mirela Dobre; Alex R Chang; James Lash; Chi-Yuan Hsu; Radhakrishna R Kallem; L Lee Hamm; Harold I Feldman; Jing Chen; Lawrence J Appel; Cheryl A M Anderson; Myles Wolf Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Joachim H Ix; Ronit Katz; Nisha Bansal; Meredith Foster; Daniel E Weiner; Russell Tracy; Vasantha Jotwani; Jan Hughes-Austin; Dianne McKay; Francis Gabbai; Chi-Yuan Hsu; Andrew Bostom; Andrew S Levey; Michael G Shlipak Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2016-12-23 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Joost C van den Born; Anne-Roos S Frenay; Stephan J L Bakker; Andreas Pasch; Jan-Luuk Hillebrands; Hiddo J Lambers Heerspink; Harry van Goor Journal: Nitric Oxide Date: 2016-03-04 Impact factor: 4.427
Authors: Kalani L Raphael; Rachel A Murphy; Michael G Shlipak; Suzanne Satterfield; Hunter K Huston; Anthony Sebastian; Deborah E Sellmeyer; Kushang V Patel; Anne B Newman; Mark J Sarnak; Joachim H Ix; Linda F Fried Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2016-01-14 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Umut Selamet; Hocine Tighiouart; Mark J Sarnak; Gerald Beck; Andrew S Levey; Geoffrey Block; Joachim H Ix Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2016-01-04 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Nai-Yuan Liu; Pinar Cay-Durgun; Tianmiao Lai; Mark Sprowls; Leslie Thomas; Mary Laura Lind; Erica Forzani Journal: IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med Date: 2018-07-05 Impact factor: 3.316