Literature DB >> 29097395

Why are NGOs sceptical of genome editing? NGOs' opposition to agricultural biotechnologies is rooted in scepticism about the framing of problems and solutions, rather than just emotion and dogma.

Richard Helliwell1, Sarah Hartley2, Warren Pearce3, Liz O'Neill4.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29097395      PMCID: PMC5709740          DOI: 10.15252/embr.201744385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO Rep        ISSN: 1469-221X            Impact factor:   8.807


× No keyword cloud information.
  1 in total

1.  Essential Features of Responsible Governance of Agricultural Biotechnology.

Authors:  Sarah Hartley; Frøydis Gillund; Lilian van Hove; Fern Wickson
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 8.029

  1 in total
  3 in total

1.  Comment on "Why are NGOs sceptical of genome editing?"

Authors:  Giovanni Tagliabue
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Reply to Tagliabue.

Authors:  Warren Pearce; Sarah Hartley; Richard Helliwell; Liz O'Neill
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Knowing when to talk? Plant genome editing as a site for pre-engagement institutional reflexivity.

Authors:  Robert D J Smith; Sarah Hartley; Patrick Middleton; Tracey Jewitt
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2021-04-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.