Literature DB >> 2909696

Comparison of dynamic and static measurements of respiratory mechanics in infants.

T Gerhardt1, L Reifenberg, S Duara, E Bancalari.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the conventional method of measuring respiratory mechanics, which requires the passage of an esophageal tube, with the occlusion technique, which is less invasive. Thirty-nine preterm infants who received mechanical ventilation on the first day were studied before discharge (mean +/- SD: postnatal age 67 +/- 23 days; weight 1790 +/- 300 gm), and 27 of them again at 1 year (weight 8.1 +/- 1.4 kg). Flows were measured through a nosepiece by pneumotachometry, tidal volume by integration of flow, esophageal pressure through a water-filled tube, and airway pressure directly at the nasal piece. Airway occlusion was performed at the end of inspiration, and the following relaxed exhalation was analyzed to give compliance (Crs) and resistance (Rrs) of the respiratory system. These values were compared with dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn) and expiratory resistance (Re) of the previous unoccluded breath. In the younger infants, dynamic and static measurements did not differ significantly and were well correlated (Cdyn/Crs, r = 0.91; Re/Rrs, r = 0.95). In the older infants, Crs was 80% of Cdyn (p less than 0.001), and Rrs was 24% higher than Re (p less than 0.001). The measurements were well correlated (Cdyn/Crs, r = 0.94; Re/Rrs, r = 0.91). The regression line Cdyn versus Crs had a slope (0.77) significantly less than 1; the regression Re versus Rrs had an intercept (13.8) significantly greater than zero. The lower Crs and higher Rrs values can be expected because the static determinations include the chest wall. In the more immature infants, the very compliant chest wall, in combination with an underestimation of Cdyn because of the higher breathing frequency of these infants, may obscure this difference. We conclude that the occlusion technique gives accurate and reproducible results, is easily applied, does not need the passage of an esophageal tube, and is well tolerated by the infants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2909696     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(89)80618-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  7 in total

1.  Case-control study of respiratory dynamic compliance in mechanically ventilated near-term newborns in a pre-hospital setting.

Authors:  Michael Tsapis; Cécile Mignot; Sandrine Katsahian; Hocine Arbaoui; Azzedine Ayachi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Intravenous or enteral loop diuretics for preterm infants with (or developing) chronic lung disease.

Authors:  Audra Stewart; Luc P Brion
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-09-07

3.  Metabolic and respiratory effects of theophylline in the preterm infant.

Authors:  V P Carnielli; G Verlato; F Benini; K Rossi; M Cavedagni; M Filippone; E Baraldi; F Zacchello
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 4.  Lung function testing--useless in ventilated newborns?

Authors:  O Hjalmarson
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.183

5.  Cardiopulmonary function in premature infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia--a 2-year follow up.

Authors:  T Farstad; F Brockmeier; D Bratlid
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Effect of transoral tracheal wash on respiratory mechanics in dogs with respiratory disease.

Authors:  Meghan E Vaught; Elizabeth A Rozanski; Armelle M deLaforcade
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.310

7.  Lung ultrasound score assessing the pulmonary edema in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome received continuous hemofiltration therapy: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Fei Wang; Chunxia Wang; Jingyi Shi; Yijun Shan; Huijie Miao; Ting Sun; Yiping Zhou; Yucai Zhang
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.317

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.