| Literature DB >> 29096606 |
Gabriella Tait1,2, Silvia Vezzulli3, Fabiana Sassù4, Gloria Antonini5, Antonio Biondi6, Nuray Baser7, Giorgia Sollai8, Alessandro Cini9, Lorenzo Tonina10, Lino Ometto3,11, Gianfranco Anfora3,12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Drosophila suzukii is a highly destructive pest species, causing substantial economic losses in soft fruit production. To better understand migration patterns, gene flow and adaptation in invaded regions, we studied the genetic structure of D. suzukii collected across Italy, where it was first observed in 2008. In particular, we analysed 15 previously characterised Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) markers to estimate genetic differentiation across the genome of 278 flies collected from nine populations.Entities:
Keywords: Bottleneck; Gene flow; Human trade; Population structure; SSR markers; Spotted wing drosophila
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29096606 PMCID: PMC5669006 DOI: 10.1186/s12863-017-0558-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genet ISSN: 1471-2156 Impact factor: 2.797
Fig. 1Field collected samples of the D. suzukii analysed in this study. This image has been adapted from the original (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Italy_topographic_map-blank.svg) whose author is Eric Gaba, and it is licensed through Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
Fig. 2Location of the 15 microsatellite markers distributed across the chromosomes 2 and 3
Summary of the genetic variability at 15 microsatellite loci
| Locus | Repeat | PIC | Allele range |
|
|
| H-W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DS05 | (TG)10 | 0.74 | 250–284 bp | 11 | 0.79 | 0.77 | ** |
| DS07 | (CA)13 | 0.84 | 180–220 bp | 20 | 0.89 | 0.86 | NS |
| DS08 | (AG)10 | 0.81 | 118–158 bp | 17 | 0.84 | 0.83 | *** |
| DS09 | (AC)15 | 0.72 | 200–230 bp | 13 | 0.71 | 0.75 | NS |
| DS14 | (TG)10 | 0.68 | 136–239 bp | 11 | 0.75 | 0.71 | ** |
| DS15 | (GT)11 | 0.76 | 238–278 bp | 13 | 0.88 | 0.79 | * |
| DS16 | (AC)13 | 0.78 | 85–119 bp | 15 | 0.91 | 0.81 | *** |
| DS17 | (GT)10 | 0.70 | 93–113 bp | 8 | 0.90 | 0.74 | *** |
| DS20 | (AG)12 | 0.74 | 207–235 bp | 13 | 0.84 | 0.77 | * |
| DS22 | (GT)11 | 0.71 | 304–334 bp | 13 | 0.83 | 0.75 | NS |
| DS23 | (AC)10 | 0.75 | 236–266 bp | 13 | 0.76 | 0.77 | NS |
| DS25 | (CA)10 | 0.71 | 222–280 bp | 18 | 0.74 | 0.74 | *** |
| DS26 | (CA)10 | 0.73 | 79–109 bp | 10 | 0.76 | 0.77 | NS |
| DS28 | (TG)11 | 0.78 | 141–161 bp | 11 | 0.86 | 0.81 | *** |
| DS32 | (TG)15 | 0.83 | 310–376 bp | 18 | 0.68 | 0.85 | *** |
Repeat, motive of the microsatellite; PIC polymorphic information content; Allele range, N number of alleles, Ho,observed heterozygosity, He expected heterozygosity
Level of genetic diversity across 9 populations of D. suzukii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trentino1 | 6.40 ± 1.29 | 3.65 ± 0.93 | 6.23 | 1 | 0.06 | 0.68 ± 0.18 | 0.70 ± 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| Trentino2 | 7.60 ± 1.50 | 3.83 ± 1.01 | 7.36 | 8 | 0.53 | 0.66 ± 0.16 | 0.72 ± 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.07 |
| Sardinia | 7.87 ± 1.40 | 4.37 ± 0.80 | 7.69 | 6 | 0.40 | 0.82 ± 0.10 | 0.76 ± 0.05 | 0.03 | −0.08 |
| Latium | 7.80 ± 1.37 | 4.18 ± 0.87 | 7.44 | 6 | 0.40 | 0.83 ± 0.13 | 0.74 ± 0.06 | 0.04 | −0.11 |
| Sicily | 5.60 ± 0.98 | 3.25 ± 0.58 | 5.44 | 1 | 0.06 | 0.87 ± 0.11 | 0.68 ± 0.05 | 0.11 | −0.28 |
| Apulia | 8.87 ± 3.44 | 5.22 ± 2.53 | 8.58 | 25 | 1.66 | 0.81 ± 0.13 | 0.77 ± 0.07 | 0.01 | −0.04 |
| Tuscany | 7.47 ± 1.12 | 4.68 ± 0.98 | 7.23 | 2 | 0.13 | 0.89 ± 0.09 | 0.77 ± 0.04 | 0.06 | −0.14 |
| Liguria | 7.40 ± 1.50 | 4.41 ± 0.77 | 7.11 | 3 | 0.20 | 0.87 ± 0.10 | 0.76 ± 0.03 | 0.05 | −0.13 |
| Veneto | 7.53 ± 1.30 | 4.14 ± 0.50 | 7.26 | 5 | 0.33 | 0.83 ± 0.16 | 0.75 ± 0.02 | 0.04 | −0.10 |
N a mean number of alleles, N e mean effective number of alleles, A r mean of allele richness, N p number of private alleles, A p mean frequency of private alleles, H O mean observed heterozygosity, H E mean expected heterozygosity, A n mean frequency of null alleles, F IS mean inbreeding coefficient
Analysis of molecular variance test (AMOVA)
| Source of variation | DF | SS | VC | %PV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among Populations | 8 | 165.16 | 0.24 | 4% |
| Within Individuals | 278 | 167.05 | 6.00 | 96% |
DF degree of freedom, SS sum of squares, VC variance components, %PV percentage of total variation
Fig. 3Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of nine populations generated from genetic distance calculation in GenAIEx program
Fig. 4Unrooted neighbour joining (UNJ) tree obtained from DARwin software. Each brunch represents single individual
Pairwise Fst among the nine populations of D. suzukii
| Trentino1 | Trentino2 | Sardinia | Latium | Sicily | Apulia | Tuscany | Liguria | Veneto | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trentino1 | 0.000 | ||||||||
| Trentino2 | 0.006 | 0.000 | |||||||
| Sardinia |
|
| 0.000 | ||||||
| Latium | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| 0.000 | |||||
| Sicily |
|
|
|
| 0.000 | ||||
| Apulia |
|
|
|
|
| 0.000 | |||
| Tuscany |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.000 | ||
| Liguria |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.000 | |
| Veneto |
| 0.006 | 0.008 |
|
|
|
| 0.003 | 0.000 |
Boldface indicates values significantly different from zero (P = 0.05)
Fig. 5Genetic structure of nine Italian D. suzukii populations estimated by structure analysis
Individual assignment analysis obtained using GENECLASS
| Trentino1 | Trentino2 | Sardinia | Latium | Sicily | Apulia | Tuscany | Liguria | Veneto | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trentino1 |
|
|
|
| 0.004 |
|
|
|
|
| Trentino2 |
|
|
|
| 0.008 |
|
|
|
|
| Sardinia | 0.087 |
|
|
| 0.005 |
|
|
|
|
| Latium |
|
|
|
| 0.008 |
|
|
|
|
| Sicily | 0.015 |
|
|
|
| 0.064 |
|
| 0.089 |
| Apulia | 0.008 | 0.084 | 0.051 | 0.056 | 0.001 |
| 0.049 | 0.040 | 0.053 |
| Tuscany | 0.052 |
|
|
| 0.006 |
|
|
|
|
| Liguria |
|
|
|
| 0.004 |
|
|
|
|
| Veneto |
|
|
|
| 0.006 |
|
|
|
|
Boldface indicates significant migration rate values (m ≥ 100)