Joline Goossens1, Dimitri Beeckman2, Ann Van Hecke3, Ilse Delbaere4, Sofie Verhaeghe5. 1. University Centre for Nursing&Midwifery, Department of Public Health, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: Jolgooss.Goossens@UGent.be. 2. University Centre for Nursing&Midwifery, Department of Public Health, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: Dimitri.Beeckman@UGent.be. 3. University Centre for Nursing&Midwifery, Department of Public Health, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; Nursing Science, University Hospital Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: Ann.Vanhecke@UGent.be. 4. VIVES University College, Doorniksesteenweg 145, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium. Electronic address: Ilse.Delbaere@Vives.be. 5. University Centre for Nursing&Midwifery, Department of Public Health, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: Sofie.Verhaeghe@UGent.be.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: (1) to study preconception lifestyle changes and associated factors in women with planned pregnancies; (2) to assess the prevalence of risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes in women not reporting any preconception lifestyle changes; and (3) to explore the need for and use of preconception-related advice. DESIGN: secondary data analysis of a cross-sectional study about pregnancy planning. SETTING: six Flemish Hospitals (Belgium). PARTICIPANTS: four hundred and thirty women with a planned pregnancy ending in birth. MEASUREMENTS: preconception lifestyle changes were measured during the first 5 days postpartum using the validated London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy. The following changes were assessed: folic acid or multivitamin intake, smoking reduction or cessation, alcohol reduction or cessation, caffeine reduction or cessation, eating more healthily, achieving a healthier weight, obtaining medical or health advice, or another self-reported preconception lifestyle change. FINDINGS: most women (83%) that planned their pregnancy reported ≥1 lifestyle change in preparation for pregnancy. Overall, nulliparous women (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.23-3.87) and women with a previous miscarriage (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.14-5.21) were more likely to prepare for pregnancy, while experiencing financial difficulties (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.04-0.97) or having a lower educational level (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.32-0.99) decreased the likelihood of preparing for pregnancy. Half of the women (48%) obtained advice about preconception health, and 86% of these women received their advice from a professional caregiver. Three-quarters (77%) of the women who did not improve their lifestyle before conceiving reported one or more risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: multiparous women and women of lower socio-economic status were less likely to change their lifestyle before conception. Strategies to promote preconception health in these women need to be tailored to their needs and characteristics to overcome barriers to change. It may be advantageous to reach these women through non-medical channels, such as schools or other community organizations.
OBJECTIVES: (1) to study preconception lifestyle changes and associated factors in women with planned pregnancies; (2) to assess the prevalence of risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes in women not reporting any preconception lifestyle changes; and (3) to explore the need for and use of preconception-related advice. DESIGN: secondary data analysis of a cross-sectional study about pregnancy planning. SETTING: six Flemish Hospitals (Belgium). PARTICIPANTS: four hundred and thirty women with a planned pregnancy ending in birth. MEASUREMENTS: preconception lifestyle changes were measured during the first 5 days postpartum using the validated London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy. The following changes were assessed: folic acid or multivitamin intake, smoking reduction or cessation, alcohol reduction or cessation, caffeine reduction or cessation, eating more healthily, achieving a healthier weight, obtaining medical or health advice, or another self-reported preconception lifestyle change. FINDINGS: most women (83%) that planned their pregnancy reported ≥1 lifestyle change in preparation for pregnancy. Overall, nulliparous women (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.23-3.87) and women with a previous miscarriage (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.14-5.21) were more likely to prepare for pregnancy, while experiencing financial difficulties (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.04-0.97) or having a lower educational level (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.32-0.99) decreased the likelihood of preparing for pregnancy. Half of the women (48%) obtained advice about preconception health, and 86% of these women received their advice from a professional caregiver. Three-quarters (77%) of the women who did not improve their lifestyle before conceiving reported one or more risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: multiparous women and women of lower socio-economic status were less likely to change their lifestyle before conception. Strategies to promote preconception health in these women need to be tailored to their needs and characteristics to overcome barriers to change. It may be advantageous to reach these women through non-medical channels, such as schools or other community organizations.
Authors: Veronique Y F Maas; Marjolein Poels; Marleen H de Kievit; Anniek P Hartog; Arie Franx; Maria P H Koster Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2022-07-19 Impact factor: 3.105
Authors: Catherine Oksas; Julia Green Brody; Phil Brown; Katherine E Boronow; Erin DeMicco; Annemarie Charlesworth; Maribel Juarez; Sarah Geiger; Susan L Schantz; Tracey J Woodruff; Rachel Morello-Frosch; Amy M Padula Journal: Environ Res Date: 2022-03-26 Impact factor: 8.431
Authors: Manuela Bombana; Michel Wensing; Lisa Wittenborn; Charlotte Ullrich Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-16 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Eline L M Op de Coul; Demi Peek; Yolanda W M van Weert; Servaas A Morré; Ingrid Rours; Chantal Hukkelhoven; Ank de Jonge; Birgit van Benthem; Monique Pereboom Journal: Reprod Health Date: 2021-06-26 Impact factor: 3.223
Authors: Isabel Corrales-Gutierrez; Ramon Mendoza; Diego Gomez-Baya; Fatima Leon-Larios Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-02-21 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Emma Doherty; Melanie Kingsland; Luke Wolfenden; John Wiggers; Julia Dray; Jenna Hollis; Elizabeth J Elliott; Justine B Daly; Kylie A Bailey; John Attia; Mandy Hunter; Ian Symonds; Belinda Tully; Danika Tremain; Rebecca K Hodder Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2019-11-23