Literature DB >> 29096266

Mobile assessment of the lower limb kinematics in healthy persons and in persons with degenerative knee disorders: A systematic review.

R van der Straaten1, L De Baets2, I Jonkers3, A Timmermans4.   

Abstract

Inertial sensor systems are increasingly used in the assessment of persons with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and total knee replacement (TKR). This systematic review aims to (1) investigate the application of inertial sensor systems and kinematics derived from these systems, and (2) assess if current assessment protocols consist of tasks which are, according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) for KOA, relevant for persons with KOA and TKR. A search was conducted in six electronic databases (ACM, CINAHL, EMBASE, IEEE, PubMed, Web of Science) to include papers assessing the knee and one or more adjacent joints by means of inertial sensors in healthy persons or persons with KOA or TKR. Two reviewers checked the methodological quality. Twenty-three papers were included: 18 in healthy persons and five in persons with KOA or TKR. In healthy persons, 11 tasks were related to metrics of the ICF-function and ICF-activity level. In persons with KOA, only walking was assessed. Apart from walking, four additional tasks were related to the ICF-function and ICF-activity level in persons with TKR. In healthy persons, joints located proximally and distally to the knee were assessed, while in persons with KOA and TKR, only the knee and ankle were assessed. This is a shortcoming since hip and trunk motion potentially contain clinically relevant information, in terms of identifying (mal)adaptive compensatory movement strategies. Additionally, physically more demanding tasks should be evaluated as these might be superior in detecting compensatory movement strategies. Former considerations warrant attention in future research.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activities; Ambulatory; Knee arthroplasty; Knee osteoarthritis; Motion-analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29096266     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  13 in total

1.  Inertial Sensor-Based Lower Limb Joint Kinematics: A Methodological Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ive Weygers; Manon Kok; Marco Konings; Hans Hallez; Henri De Vroey; Kurt Claeys
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-26       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  Lower Limb Kinematics Using Inertial Sensors during Locomotion: Accuracy and Reproducibility of Joint Angle Calculations with Different Sensor-to-Segment Calibrations.

Authors:  Julien Lebleu; Thierry Gosseye; Christine Detrembleur; Philippe Mahaudens; Olivier Cartiaux; Massimo Penta
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Lower limb kinematics improvement after genicular nerve blockade in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a milestone study using inertial sensors.

Authors:  Julien Lebleu; Loic Fonkoue; Eric Bandolo; Herman Fossoh; Philippe Mahaudens; Olivier Cornu; Christine Detrembleur
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Independent and sensitive gait parameters for objective evaluation in knee and hip osteoarthritis using wearable sensors.

Authors:  Ramon J Boekesteijn; José M H Smolders; Vincent J J F Busch; Alexander C H Geurts; Katrijn Smulders
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 5.  Wearable Inertial Sensors for Gait Analysis in Adults with Osteoarthritis-A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Dylan Kobsar; Zaryan Masood; Heba Khan; Noha Khalil; Marium Yossri Kiwan; Sarah Ridd; Matthew Tobis
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Human Activity Recognition for People with Knee Osteoarthritis-A Proof-of-Concept.

Authors:  Jay-Shian Tan; Behrouz Khabbaz Beheshti; Tara Binnie; Paul Davey; J P Caneiro; Peter Kent; Anne Smith; Peter O'Sullivan; Amity Campbell
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 7.  Validity and reliability of wearable inertial sensors in healthy adult walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dylan Kobsar; Jesse M Charlton; Calvin T F Tse; Jean-Francois Esculier; Angelo Graffos; Natasha M Krowchuk; Daniel Thatcher; Michael A Hunt
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Reliability of 3D Lower Extremity Movement Analysis by Means of Inertial Sensor Technology during Transitional Tasks.

Authors:  Rob van der Straaten; Annick Timmermans; Amber K B D Bruijnes; Benedicte Vanwanseele; Ilse Jonkers; Liesbet De Baets
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Progress on Range of Motion After Total Knee Replacement by Sensor-Based System.

Authors:  Yo-Ping Huang; Yu-Yu Liu; Wei-Hsiu Hsu; Li-Ju Lai; Mel S Lee
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Gait pattern analysis and clinical subgroup identification: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Sunghyon Kyeong; Seung Min Kim; Suk Jung; Dae Hyun Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.