| Literature DB >> 29095994 |
Parisa Noorian1,2, Jie Hu3, Zhiliang Chen1,4, Staffan Kjelleberg5, Marc R Wilkins1,4, Shuyang Sun2, Diane McDougald1,2,5.
Abstract
Protozoan predation is one of the main environmental factors constraining bacterial growth in aquatic environments, and thus has led to the evolution of a number of defence mechanisms that protect bacteria from predation. These mechanisms may also function as virulence factors in infection of animal and human hosts. Whole transcriptome shotgun sequencing of Vibrio cholerae biofilms during predation by the amoebae, Acanthamoeba castellanii, revealed that 131 transcripts were significantly differentially regulated when compared to the non-grazed control. Differentially regulated transcripts included those involved in biosynthetic and metabolic pathways. The transcripts of genes involved in tyrosine metabolism were down-regulated in the grazed population, which indicates that the tyrosine metabolic regulon may have a role in the response of V. cholerae biofilms to A. castellanii predation. Homogentisate 1, 2-dioxygenase (HGA) is the main intermediate of the normal L-tyrosine catabolic pathway which is known to auto-oxidize, leading to the formation of the pigment, pyomelanin. Indeed, a pigmented mutant, disrupted in hmgA, was more resistant to amoebae predation than the wild type. Increased grazing resistance was correlated with increased production of pyomelanin and thus reactive oxygen species (ROS), suggesting that ROS production is a defensive mechanism used by bacterial biofilms against predation by amoebae A. castellanii. © FEMS 2017.Entities:
Keywords: V. cholerae; biofilms; environmental fitness; grazing resistance; pigment production; protozoan predation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29095994 PMCID: PMC5812506 DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fix147
Source DB: PubMed Journal: FEMS Microbiol Ecol ISSN: 0168-6496 Impact factor: 4.194
Strains and plasmids used in this study.
| Strain | Properties | Reference/source |
|---|---|---|
| Bacterial strains | ||
|
| Wild type, O1 El Tor, Inaba, smooth, Rifr | Valeru |
|
| O1 El Tor, Inaba, smooth, Δ | Valeru |
|
| O1 El Tor, Inaba, smooth, Δ | Valeru |
|
| O1 El Tor, Inaba, smooth, pUC18, Rifr, Apr | This study |
|
| O1 El Tor, Inaba, smooth, Δ | This study |
| Plasmids | ||
| pUC18 | Cloning vector, pMB1 ori, LAC pr, | Yanisch-Perron |
| Protozoan strains | ||
|
| Wild type | ATCC 30234 |
|
| Wild type | ATCC 205063 |
Figure 1.Differentially expressed transcripts in grazed compared to ungrazed biofilms involved in tyrosine degradation in V. cholerae. FC represents log2 fold changes. The pathway in V. cholerae is proposed by Valeru et al. (2009).
Figure 2.Biofilm biomass of early (A) and late (B) biofilms of V. cholerae A1552 exposed to grazing by A. castellanii for 72 h. Biofilm biomass was determined by CV staining. Data were natural log transformed and the percentage change of biofilm biomass was calculated by removing the biomass of ungrazed samples from the grazed samples divided by the ungrazed. The experiment was run in three replicates and repeated three times separately. Error bars represent standard deviation. Small letters indicate different statistical groups derived from one-way ANOVA and Dunnett's multiple comparisons tests. Statistical significance is indicated by **P < 0.001; ***, P < 0.0001 and Ns, not significant.
Figure 3.Early biofilms of V. cholerae A1552 exposed to T. pyriformis for 72 h. Biofilm biomass was determined by CV staining (A) and the planktonic cells in the supernatant enumerated by the drop plate method (B). Data were natural log transformed and the percentage change in biofilm biomass was calculated by removing the ungrazed biomass from the grazed biofilm biomass divided by the ungrazed. The experiment was run in three replicates and repeated three times separately. Error bars represent standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test that revealed no significant difference, P = 0.3 (A) and P = 0.1 (B).
Figure 4.Amount of pyomelanin produced by non-grazed or grazed established biofilms after 3 days exposure to A. castellanii (A) or T. pyriformis (B). Pyomelanin secreted by the biofilm into the supernatant was measured by optical density (OD 405 nm) of the cell-free supernatant obtained from the biofilms. Amount of pyomelanin was then normalised by using the corresponding biofilm biomass measured by CV assays (OD 490 nm). Experiments were run in triplicates and repeated three times on different days. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three replicates. Bars indicate different statistical groups derived from two-way ANOVA and Sidak's multiple comparisons test. Statistical significance is indicated by ****, P < 0.0001.
Figure 5.Amount of pyomelanin produced by biofilms of V. cholerae A1552 wild type and hmgA mutant strains after 1 and 3 days (A). Amount of ROS in the cell-free supernatant of 3 days-old-biofilms of V. cholerae A1552 wild type and hmgA mutant (B). Pyomelanin secreted by the biofilm into the supernatant was measured by optical density (OD 405 nm) of the cell-free supernatant obtained from the biofilms. Amount of pyomelanin was then normalised by using the corresponding biofilm biomass measured by CV assays (OD 490 nm). Error bars represent the standard deviation of three replicates. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA and Sidak's multiple comparisons test (A) and Student's t-test (B). Statistical significance is indicated by **, P < 0.001, ****, P < 0.0001.
Figure 6.Effect of cell-free supernatants (A), H2O2 (B) and catalase (C) on grazing resistance to A. castellanii. The cell-free supernatant of 3-days-old V. cholerae biofilms were added to 3-days-old biofilms at a concentration of 50% in fresh VNSS and incubated with A. castellanii for 3 days. Biofilm biomass was determined by CV staining. Experiments were run in triplicate and repeated three times on different days. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three replicates. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and Dunnett's multiple comparisons test comparing all to the WT (A), Student's t-test (B) and two-way ANOVA and Sidak's multiple comparisons test (C). Statistical significance is indicated by *, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001 and ****, P < 0.0001 and Ns, not significant.