Literature DB >> 29095478

Effectiveness of a participatory physical and psychosocial intervention to balance the demands and resources of industrial workers: A cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Nidhi Gupta1, Christian Dyrlund Wåhlin-Jacobsen, Johan Simonsen Abildgaard, Louise Nøhr Henriksen, Karina Nielsen, Andreas Holtermann.   

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a participatory physical and psychosocial workplace intervention (known as PIPPI) on work ability and recovery among industrial workers. Methods Eligible workers were cluster-randomized into intervention (N=193) and control (N=222) groups. Intervention group members participated in three workshops where they mapped positive and negative aspects of their physical and psychosocial work environment and developed action plans addressing the highlighted issues, which were subsequently implemented by the participants. Questionnaire-based data on work ability and recovery were collected at baseline and 8-, 10- and 12-month follow-up. Data on productivity, well-being, mental health, and physical demands and resources were collected at baseline and 12-month follow-up. Results The intervention was delivered and received as planned (100% planned workshops conducted, 69% [standard deviation (SD) 7%] participation in workshops) and with a response rate of 76% (SD 8%) to the questionnaires. No significant between-group improvements for any of the outcomes were found in intention-to-treat multi-level mixed models. On the contrary, tendencies were observed for poorer recovery and reduced work ability in the intervention compared to control group. Conclusion The intervention did not improve the outcomes. This result can have several explanations, such as a regression-toward-the-mean effect or that the intervention might have put an additional burden on the workers already facing high work demands. In addition, there may have been an insufficient match between the intervention components implemented and the predetermined outcomes, and implementation may have been unsuccessful. These potential explanations need to be investigated using process evaluation data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29095478     DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health        ISSN: 0355-3140            Impact factor:   5.024


  9 in total

1.  Effect of the National Stress Check Program on mental health among workers in Japan: A 1-year retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kotaro Imamura; Yumi Asai; Kazuhiro Watanabe; Akizumi Tsutsumi; Akihito Shimazu; Akiomi Inoue; Hisanori Hiro; Yuko Odagiri; Toru Yoshikawa; Etsuko Yoshikawa; Norito Kawakami
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.708

2.  Validation of a Short-Form Version of the Danish Need for Recovery Scale against the Full Scale.

Authors:  Matthew L Stevens; Patrick Crowley; Anne H Garde; Ole S Mortensen; Clas-Håkan Nygård; Andreas Holtermann
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Designing industrial work to be 'just right' to promote health - a study protocol for a goldilocks work intervention.

Authors:  Anders Fritz Lerche; Svend Erik Mathiassen; Charlotte Lund Rasmussen; Leon Straker; Karen Søgaard; Andreas Holtermann
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Evaluating the Effect of Supported Systematic Work Environment Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Patrik Haraldsson; Axel Ros; Dirk Jonker; Kristina Areskoug Josefsson
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-03-10

5.  Effects of a co-created occupational health intervention on stress and psychosocial working conditions within the construction industry: A controlled trial.

Authors:  Emma Cedstrand; Hanna Augustsson; Magnus Alderling; Néstor Sánchez Martinez; Theo Bodin; Anna Nyberg; Gun Johansson
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-09-23

6.  H-WORK Project: Multilevel Interventions to Promote Mental Health in SMEs and Public Workplaces.

Authors:  Marco De Angelis; Davide Giusino; Karina Nielsen; Emmanuel Aboagye; Marit Christensen; Siw Tone Innstrand; Greta Mazzetti; Machteld van den Heuvel; Roy B L Sijbom; Vince Pelzer; Rita Chiesa; Luca Pietrantoni
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  A Participatory Intervention to Improve the Psychosocial Work Environment and Mental Health in Human Service Organisations. A Mixed Methods Evaluation Study.

Authors:  Emma Cedstrand; Anna Nyberg; Sara Sanchez-Bengtsson; Magnus Alderling; Hanna Augustsson; Theo Bodin; Helle Mölsted Alvesson; Gun Johansson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Co-Creating an Occupational Health Intervention within the Construction Industry in Sweden: Stakeholder Perceptions of the Process and Output.

Authors:  Emma Cedstrand; Helle Mølsted Alvesson; Hanna Augustsson; Theo Bodin; Erika Bodin; Anna Nyberg; Gun Johansson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Workplace interventions that aim to improve employee health and well-being in male-dominated industries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paige M Hulls; Rebecca C Richmond; Richard M Martin; Yanaina Chavez-Ugalde; Frank de Vocht
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 4.402

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.