Literature DB >> 29095430

Excipient exposure in very low birth weight preterm neonates.

T O Akinmboni1, N L Davis1, A J Falck1, C F Bearer1, S M Mooney1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The excipients benzyl alcohol, propylene glycol and ethanol are present in medications used in the neonatal intensive care unit. Exposure to high levels can have adverse effects in a neonatal population. The objective was to quantify excipient exposure in very low birth weight (VLBW) neonates and identify risk factors associated with greater exposure. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective record review of VLBW infants admitted over 1 year. Excipient exposures were calculated and multivariable regression analyses identified risk factors for increasing exposure.
RESULTS: In total, 98% of subjects were exposed to at least one excipient. A total of 5 to 9% received doses higher than recommended for adults. Necrotizing enterocolitis, seizure, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and longer stay predicted higher excipient exposure.
CONCLUSION: The excipients examined are in medications commonly prescribed for VLBW neonates, and cumulative doses may exceed recommended exposures for adults. Although safety profiles have not been established, judicious use of medication containing these excipients is warranted for this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29095430      PMCID: PMC5790602          DOI: 10.1038/jp.2017.165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   2.521


INTRODUCTION

Excipients are chemicals added to pharmaceutical products to extend shelf life, enhance solubility or absorption, control release of active ingredients, and/or increase palatability. They are not intended to exert therapeutic effects. Recent studies show that neonates in hospitals may be exposed to high levels of excipients, often at doses higher than recommended for adults (1–4). High levels of excipient exposure in neonates have led to adverse effects. In healthy children and adults, both the preservative benzyl alcohol (BA) and the solubilizer propylene glycol (PG) are metabolized rapidly into harmless chemicals: BA is oxidized to benzoic acid, which is conjugated with glycine in the liver, and excreted as hippuric acid, whereas PG is metabolized into pyruvic acid, acetic acid, and lactic acid, and excreted in the urine. However, preterm babies are unable to use these metabolic pathways effectively (5). Inefficient metabolism of BA causes accumulation which can result in dyspnea, sedation and loss of motor function. Animal studies have shown that these effects are due to BA itself and not a metabolite (6). Exposure to high levels of BA is associated with developmental delay, cerebral palsy, and death in neonates (7–10). The half-life of PG is three times longer in neonates than in adults (11, 12), and exposure to high levels of PG has been associated with lactic acidosis, central nervous system depression, and seizures (e.g.,(13–15)). Another common excipient is ethanol (ET), which is used as a solvent and a preservative. Metabolism of ET may also be immature in neonates (16) and at this time there is no known safe level of ET exposure. Safety data for some excipients is available for adults but not for the preterm population. The Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA; administered by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO)) has established the acceptable daily oral intake (ADI) for BA and PG for adults at 0–5 mg/kg/day and 0–25 mg/kg/day, respectively (17–19). No ADI has been established for BA or PG for children. And no amount of ET intake should be considered safe, as any exposure is potentially harmful to the developing brain (20). The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Committee on Drugs recommends that medications intended for children should contain no ethanol, however, if ethanol must be utilized it should be limited to a maximum of 5% (v/v) and should not be capable of producing a blood alcohol level >25 mg/dl after a single dose (21). Prior studies report that pediatric patients admitted to intensive care units may be exposed to more than the established ADIs for BA and PG (1). To our knowledge, there is no prior study quantifying exposure to BA, PG and ET in the preterm very low birth weight (VLBW, ≤ 1500g) population. In 2014 approximately 1.4% of live births, or 55,833 babies, were VLBW (22). These children are at risk for numerous comorbidities related to prematurity and are frequently in need of multiple medications. Thus, there is the potential for exposure to multiple excipients. The aim of this study was to quantify exposure to three excipients: BA, PG and ET, and to identify risk factors associated with highest exposure.

METHODS

A retrospective medical record review was performed on charts of VLBW neonates from the University of Maryland Medical Center Level IV NICU born between July 1, 2012 and June 30, 2013. The study had prior approval from the Institutional Review Board at the University of Maryland, Baltimore. Inclusion criteria were: birth gestational age (GA) ≤30 weeks, birth weight (BW) <1500 grams, and admission to the NICU within 24 hours of birth. Infants transferred to our NICU at >24 hours were excluded as this could limit access to accurate medication records. Demographic and clinical data collected included: sex, BW, GA, small for gestational age (SGA) status, maternal antenatal steroids, resuscitation requirements (including surfactant administration), respiratory support requirements (including increasing severity from room air to nasal cannula to continuous positive airway pressure [CPAP] to conventional mechanical ventilation to high frequency oscillatory ventilation [HFOV]), diagnoses such as: patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) Bell’s stage II or III (23), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) defined as oxygen requirement +/− positive pressure ventilation at 28 days, and at 36 weeks post menstrual age (PMA), Score of Neonatal Acute Physiology Perinatal Extension II (SNAPPE-II; (24, 25)), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), length of stay (LOS), and death prior to discharge. Data on medications received included route of administration, dose, and duration. Data on excipient content of each medication was calculated from information in the packaging inserts or as reported by pharmaceutical companies. Parenteral nutrition, surfactant, and inhalant medications did not contain any of the three excipients, and excipient exposure from topical or ophthalmic medications was not calculated due to variability in the amount applied by different providers. Total excipient exposure was defined as the total amount of excipient received during the period of hospitalization (mg for BA and PG, ml for absolute ET). Weight-based exposures (mg/kg/day and ml/kg/day) were performed by calculating the cumulative exposure per day and dividing by BW until the subject’s weight surpassed BW, at which time the cumulative exposure was divided by the weight recorded on the Monday of that week. Demographic and clinical risk factors were analyzed using T-test and Chi-Square as appropriate for continuous, binary, and categorical variables. Multivariable linear regression models were used to determine significant predictors of increasing excipient exposure for BA, PG, and ET. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine significant predictors of any exposure to BA; this was not done for PG or ET as a majority of subjects was exposed to these excipients. Analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel 2010 and SAS 9.3 (Carey, NC).

RESULTS

There were 106 eligible subjects. Mean (SD) BW of the overall study cohort was 961g (245g), mean GA was 27.4 weeks (2.1 weeks), and 60% of subjects were female. Thirteen subjects (12%) died prior to discharge. Five of these died within the first 48 hours of life. Mean SNAPPE II score was significantly (p=<0.00001) higher in subjects who died compared with those who survived till discharge (73 ± 29 vs. 27 ± 20). Demographic and clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Demographics and Clinical Characteristics of Subjects Exposed to Excipients

Cohortcharacteristics106 Subjectsn (%) ormean (SD)BA36 Subjectsn (%) ormean (SD)PG93 Subjectsn (%) ormean (SD)ET91 Subjectsn (%) ormean (SD)BA, PG, ET26 Subjectsn (%) ormean (SD)
Female64 (60.4)17 (47.2)55 (59.1)54 (59.3)11 (42)
GA, weeks27.4 (2.1)26.3 (2.2)27.4 (2.2)27.6 (2.1)26.4 (2)
BW, grams961 (245)819 (204)958 (242)980 (232)838 (217)
SGA10 (9.4)6 (16.7)8 (8.6)7 (7.7)4 (15)
Antenatal Steroids89 (84)28 (77.8)85 (91.4)79 (86.8)23 (88)
Surfactant81 (76.4)33 (91.7)69 (74.2)69 (75.8)23 (88)
High Frequency Ventilation (^n=102)32 (31.4)25 (69.4)26 (28.9)23 (26.1)15 (58)
PDA37 (36.6)22 (66.7)33 (36.7)34 (37.4)17 (65)
NEC15 (14.2)12 (33.3)11 (11.8)13 (14.3)9 (34)
Surgical NEC7 (6.6)7 (19.4)5 (5.4)5 (5.5)4 (15)
ROP51 (48.1)26 (81.3)46 (52.3)50 (54.9)22 (84)
IVH all stages35 (34.7)23 (67.7)31 (34.4)29 (31.9)15 (58)
IVH (stage 3 or 4)13 (12)13 (36.1)11 (11.8)9 (9.9)7 (27)
Oxygen at 28 days (*n=99)74 (74.7)30 (83.3)65 (73.9)70 (76.9)24 (92)
Oxygen at PMA 36wk (*n=99)34 (34.3)20 (55.6)31 (35.2)34 (37.3)17 (65)
Length of Stay, days68.8 (55.3)88.6 (59.3)68.6 (53.5)77.4 (54.8)96 (47)
SNAPPE II Scores32.1 (26.4)48.6 (28.9)30.3 (25.4)27.5 (21.6)39 (21)
Discharge PMA, weeks37.3 (8)38.9 (9.1)37.3 (7.7)38.6 (7.7)40.1 (7)
Death prior to discharge13 (12.2)10 (27.8)10 (10.8)4 (4.4)4 (15)
Death < 48h of life5 (4.7)2 (5.6)3 (3.2)0 (0)0 (0)

GA: gestational age; IVH: Intraventricular Hemorrhage; NEC: Necrotizing Enterocolitis; PDA: Patent Ductus Arteriosus; PMA: Post menstrual age; SGA: small for gestational age; ROP: Retinopathy of Prematurity; SNAPPE II: Score of Neonatal Acute Physiology Perinatal Extension.

Denominator reflects 4 neonates who did not receive respiratory support.

Denominator based on number alive at that time.

Excipient Exposure

Nineteen of the 110 PO, IV, or IM preparations contained one or more of the excipients (Table 2). In this cohort, 98% of subjects (n=104) were exposed to at least one of the excipients and 85% received two or more excipients (Tables 1 & 3). Around 11% of subjects were exposed to an excipient at a dose greater than the WHO or FDA recommendations for adults, and nearly 4% were exposed to more than the adult ADI for both BA and PG for at least one day during their stay. Frequency of exposures to BA, PG and ET were 34% (n=36), 88% (n=93), and 86% (n=91), respectively. Two subjects (1.9%) had no excipient exposure; one died within 48 hours therefore had minimal medication exposure and the other had a birth weight of 1490 grams, thus, was at the upper limit of VLBW definition. Approximately 25% of the population (n=26) was exposed to all three excipients, 54% was exposed to both PG and ET, whereas co-exposures of PG or ET with BA were low (~3%; Table 3).
Table 2

Excipient Content of Commonly Used NICU Medications

Medication(concentration)RouteBenzyl Alcohol(mg/ml)Propylene Glycol(mg/ml)Ethanol(%/ml)
Bumetanide (0.25 mg/ml)IV10
Chlorothiazide (50 mg/ml)PO0.5
Dexamethasone (4 mg/ml)IV10
Dexamethasone (0.1 mg/ml)PO5.1
Ergocalciferol (8000 units/ml)PO1.063
Hydrocortisone (50 mg/ml)IV9
Iron Sulfate (75 mg/ml)PO0.2
Lorazepam (2 mg/ml)IV20800
Midazolam (1 mg/ml)IV10
Methadone (1 mg/ml)PO8.0
Methylprednisolone (40 mg/ml)IV8.8
Nystatin (100,000 units/ml)PO801.0
Phenobarbital (65 mg/ml)IV15.7702.40.1
Phenobarbital (4 mg/ml)PO15
Potassium (1.3 mEq/ml)PO4.0
Prednisone (3 mg/ml)PO5.0
Ranitidine (15 mg/ml)PO7.7
Vecuronium (10 mg/ml)IV9
Vitamin K (phytonadione) (2 mg/ml)IM20.8
Table 3

Excipient Exposure

ExcipientNumber (%)Exposed
NONE2 (1.9)
Benzyl Alcohol (BA)36 (34)
Propylene Glycol (PG)93 (88)
Ethanol (ET)91 (86)
PG+ET57 (54)
BA+ET3 (2.8)
BA+PG4 (3.8)
BA+PG+ET26 (24.5)

Benzyl Alcohol

Eight medications contained BA. IV forms of midazolam (56%), dexamethasone (20%), phenobarbital (14%), and hydrocortisone (8%) were responsible for 98% of BA exposure. Among the 36 subjects exposed to BA, the median exposure was 1.15 mg/kg/day (interquartile range (IQR) 1.8; Table 4).
Table 4

Excipient Exposure

ExcipientBA(mg/kg/day)PG(mg/kg/day)ET(ml/kg/day)

Median Exposure (IQR)1.15 (1.8)6.30 (2.94)0.01 (0.03)
Total Range (0.22–7.9)Total Range (0.19–117.29)Total Range (0.00003 – 0.11)

Median Exposure Days (IQR)15.5 (21.3)1 (0)32 (24)
Total Range: 1–98Total Range 1–120Total Range 2–204

WHO Acceptable Daily Intake for Adults (mg/kg/day)525NA
Four subjects (11%) in the BA exposed group received a median daily exposure greater than the WHO ADI for adults. The subject with highest total BA exposure received 922.5 mg over a period of 16 days (7.9 mg/kg/day; Figure 1). This subject was male with BW of 610 grams and GA 24–6/7 weeks, received 72 different medications and died prior to discharge. Three of the 5 (67%) patients with the highest daily median BA exposure died prior to discharge.
Figure 1

Median Daily Excipient Exposure

Daily median exposure to each excipient for all subjects in the cohort shown in order of increasing exposure. Triangles denote females and squares show males. Dashed lines show acceptable daily intake levels for adults for BA and PG determined by the Joint Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World Health Organization Expert Committee on Food Additives.

The multivariable logistic regression model demonstrated that increasing respiratory support requirement, any IVH diagnosis, NEC Stage II or III diagnosis, and PDA diagnosis were associated with increased odds of BA exposure (Table 5). The multivariable linear regression showed that significant predictors of higher BA exposure as a continuous variable were NEC, presence of seizures, BPD at 36 weeks, and death prior to discharge (Table 6).
Table 5

Multivariable Logistic Regression Model of Predictors of Benzyl Alcohol Exposure

Adjusted OR*95% CIp-value
Increasing Respiratory Support Requirement4.351.23–15.360.0225
IVH diagnosis (any grade)6.791.87–24.700.0036
NEC diagnosis8.391.32–53.330.0241
PDA diagnosis5.451.38–21.470.0155

Adjusted for respiratory support requirements, NEC, PDA, IVH diagnoses. Respiratory support requirements range from nasal cannula to CPAP to SiPAP to conventional ventilator to high frequency ventilator.

Table 6

Multivariable Linear Regression Model Outcomes: Predictors of Higher Exposures

BA1Parameter EstimateStandard Errorp-value
NEC Diagnosis1.2040.3630.0012
Seizure Diagnosis1.6600.7640.0321
BPD diagnosis at 36 weeks0.9410.2700.0007
Died prior to discharge1.1620.3910.0037
PG2
NEC diagnosis14.54.80.0034
Seizure diagnosis40.810.20.0001
ET3
Length of Stay, days0.000156390.000048280.0018
BPD at 36 weeks0.012500.005670.0307

Adjusted for NEC diagnosis, seizure diagnosis, BPD diagnosis at 36 weeks, death prior to discharge

Adjusted for NEC and seizure diagnosis

Adjusted for LOS and BPD diagnosis at 36 weeks corrected GA

All subjects who received BA required mechanical ventilation at some point during hospitalization; 69% (n=25) were on HFOV and 83% (n=30) required supplemental oxygen at 28 days postnatal life. The mean SNAPPE II score was significantly (p<0.001) higher in subjects exposed to BA compared with the no BA exposure cohort; 49 (± 29) vs. 23 (±20).

Propylene glycol

PG was present in 7 medications used in the NICU. Phenobarbital IV (66%), nystatin PO (25%), and lorazepam IV (6%) accounted for the majority of PG exposure. Among the 93 babies who were exposed to PG, the median exposure was 6.3 mg/kg (IQR 3.1; Table 4). Ten subjects (11%) in the PG exposed group received more PG than the WHO ADI for adults. The subject with the longest duration of exposure received 3081 mg over a period of 120 days (25.6 mg/kg/day; Figure 1), was a male with BW of 850 g, GA of 28–6/7 weeks and received 53 different medications. This subject died prior to discharge. The subject with the highest overall exposure received 117 mg/kg/day over 2 days, was male with BW of 1220 g, GA of 29–6/7 weeks, and received 26 different medications, and survived to discharge. Multivariable linear regression models demonstrated that significant predictors of being exposed to increasing doses of PG included NEC and seizure diagnoses (Table 6). In this group, 93% (n = 87) of subjects required mechanical ventilation, with 29% requiring HFOV.

Ethanol

Ten medications utilized by the cohort contained ET. Oral preparations of potassium chloride (63%), ranitidine (26%), and chlorothiazide (3%) accounted for the majority of the ethanol exposure. Mean SNAPPE-II scores were higher (p=0.003) in those subjects not exposed to ET (60±30) than in those who were exposed (28±22). Twenty-three subjects (26.1%) required HFOV. For the 91 subjects exposed to ET, the median daily exposure was 0.01 ml/kg/day (IQR 0.03; Table 4). The subject with the highest ET exposure received 74 ml over a period of 204 days (0.11 ml/kg/day; Figure 1). This subject was female, BW 1125 grams, GA of 27–6/7 weeks, and received 49 different medications. Multivariable linear regression models demonstrated that significant predictors of exposure to higher doses of ET included longer LOS and BPD at 36 weeks corrected GA (Table 6).

DISCUSSION

Our cohort was exposed to 110 different medications via IV, IM, or PO routes. Nineteen of the medications routinely used in the University of Maryland Medical Center NICU during the time of the study contained one or more of the three excipients of interest. Our data underestimates overall excipient exposure as we did not quantify every excipient contained in these medications, nor did we include medications given by other routes. Overall, 98% of patients were exposed to at least one of the three excipients. Exposure to PG or ET was greater than 80%, which is in contrast to recent reports from Europe in which risk of exposure to a particular excipient is low; approximately 10% of extremely or very preterm infants were exposed to either excipient (4, 26). In contrast, rates of excipient exposure in Brazil were similar to that seen in the current study (3), although doses were not reported. The median exposure of the study cohort to BA was less than the WHO ADI for adults, however, 11% of infants exposed to BA received more than the WHO ADI for adults on at least one day. We found that higher BA exposure was related to NEC, seizure diagnosis, and BPD. Thus, patients exposed to BA were typically critically ill (as evidenced by the significantly higher SNAPPE-II scores) and were more likely to be prescribed medications containing BA for sedation or muscle relaxation (e.g. midazolam, lorazepam, vecuronium), for blood pressure management, or for chronic lung disease (e.g. dexamethasone, hydrocortisone). The highest exposure in this study was 7.9 mg/kg/day which is significantly lower than the fatal doses neonates were exposed to in the 1980s (99–234 mg/kg/day) (7). The median daily PG exposure in the study population (6.3 mg/kg/day) was within the WHO acceptable and safe daily intakes for adults (of 0–25 mg/kg/day). However, 11% of the VLBWs who were exposed did reach levels above this threshold. The five patients with the highest PG exposure received 2.1–4.5 times the WHO ADI. Although a prior study suggested that exposure to 34 mg/kg/day of PG did not alter renal, hepatic, or metabolic function in preterm infants in the short term, long term neurodevelopmental outcomes of PG exposure were not evaluated (27). The AAP strongly discourages the intake of any form of alcohol during pregnancy (20) and safe exposure levels for VLBWs are unknown. Any exposure to ET in the preterm neonate may impact the developing brain and other systems. ET is found in medications commonly used during the chronic phase of NICU hospitalization in infants. A recent study showed that blood alcohol concentrations are relatively low in neonates weighing approximately 2000 g that were given medications containing ethanol (28). However some infants showed elevated levels of acetaldehyde, a potentially toxic metabolite of ethanol (28). In our study, higher ET exposure was associated with longer LOS and increased odds of BPD. The preterm population has unique developmental and physiologic factors that influence the distribution and metabolism of drugs compared with term infants, children, or adults. The renal system is extremely important for drug excretion, yet the kidneys are not fully developed at birth even in a full term neonate (29). Similarly, hepatic enzymes important for metabolism, such as cytochrome P450 and alcohol dehydrogenase, may be immature and not fully functional. One result is that preterm neonates may metabolize excipients differently, and both the half-life and the clearance rate may be longer than that of an adult. (30). If toxic metabolites accumulate and diffuse across the immature blood brain barrier, adverse neurodevelopmental sequelae are possible consequences. Both PG and ET are metabolized by alcohol dehydrogenase. Since these excipients may be administered concurrently, competitive utilization of metabolic enzymes may further impact toxic effects. In our cohort, 90 subjects (85%) received more than one excipient, and 57 subjects received both ET and PG. In 1997, the AAP Committee on Drugs reiterated its 1985 recommended to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that over-the-counter and prescription medications be labeled to include a list of inactive ingredients (12). However, prescribers in inpatient settings, including the NICU, may still be unaware of the “inactive” ingredients contained in the medications prescribed. In the course of this study we found that accessing the excipient content of certain preparations was challenging, even when pharmaceutical companies and their marketing companies were contacted directly. While it would be optimal to obtain preservative- and excipient-free medications, these may not always be available and/or may be more expensive. If two medications are likely to give similar therapeutic benefits, knowing excipient content may help guide providers to choose the medication with the lowest excipient burden. It would be ideal that medications given as the standard of care in the newborn period, like vitamin K, have excipient-free options, because all newborns are expected to receive this medication unless contraindicated. Our study was designed to define exposure to three excipients: BA, PG, and ET. We obtained a complete data set of medications received and the excipient content of each medication. Our subjects were exposed to several excipients other than the excipients described here, but we chose to focus on three common excipients in neonatal medications that have been shown from prior studies to be harmful in the neonatal population. This study may underestimate excipient exposure in the NICU because only certain types of medications (PO, IV, IM) were included in the analysis. In addition, due to the retrospective nature of the study, we can only demonstrate associations between excipient exposure and outcomes, not causality. However, the levels of excipient exposure calculated are high enough to warrant concern, especially since this data reflect exposure risk even when our pediatric pharmacy has sought to obtain excipient-free medications for the NICU when feasible. Institutions who are not currently seeking excipient-free medications would likely have higher excipient exposure than seen in our study. To our knowledge, this is the first study delineating exposure to these three excipients in the preterm VLBW population during NICU hospitalization. It will be important for future studies to prospectively assess excipient exposure and to evaluate neurodevelopmental impact of excipient exposure.

Conclusions

Preterm neonates are exposed to excipients during their NICU hospitalization, and some VLBW neonates receive more than the adult ADI. A safe level of excipient exposure has not been determined for neonates, instead these data are extrapolated from adult studies. Providers should be aware of the presence and concentration of excipients added to medications and the potential toxicities, in a similar fashion to the active component of prescribed medications. The impact of excipient exposure in VLBW infants needs further evaluation. Future studies will focus on the neurodevelopmental impact of excipient exposure in this vulnerable population.
  28 in total

Review 1.  Neonatal disease severity scoring systems.

Authors:  J S Dorling; D J Field; B Manktelow
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Hyperosmolality related to propylene glycol in an infant.

Authors:  S Murch; K Costeloe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990 Aug 18-25

Review 3.  "Inactive" ingredients in pharmaceutical products: update (subject review). American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Toxic excipients in medications for neonates in Brazil.

Authors:  Alcidésio Souza; Djanilson Santos; Said Fonseca; Marina Medeiros; Lívia Batista; Mark Turner; Helena Coelho
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.183

5.  Propylene glycol: increased incidence of seizures in low birth weight infants.

Authors:  M G MacDonald; P R Getson; A M Glasgow; M K Miller; R L Boeckx; E L Johnson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Exposure to the pharmaceutical excipients benzyl alcohol and propylene glycol among critically ill neonates.

Authors:  Nadine Shehab; Carrie L Lewis; Darcie D Streetman; Steven M Donn
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.624

Review 7.  Postnatal development of renal function during the first year of life.

Authors:  B S Arant
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.714

8.  Hospitalised neonates in Estonia commonly receive potentially harmful excipients.

Authors:  Jana Lass; Kaisa Naelapää; Utpal Shah; Ruth Käär; Heili Varendi; Mark A Turner; Irja Lutsar
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.125

Review 9.  Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis: pathogenesis, classification, and spectrum of illness.

Authors:  R M Kliegman; M C Walsh
Journal:  Curr Probl Pediatr       Date:  1987-04

10.  Essential medicines containing ethanol elevate blood acetaldehyde concentrations in neonates.

Authors:  H C Pandya; H Mulla; M Hubbard; R L Cordell; P S Monks; S Yakkundi; J C McElnay; A J Nunn; M A Turner
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.183

View more
  6 in total

1.  Neonatal ethanol exposure triggers apoptosis in the murine retrosplenial cortex: Role of inhibition of NMDA receptor-driven action potential firing.

Authors:  Clark W Bird; Megan J Barber; Hilary R Post; Belkis Jacquez; Glenna J Chavez; Nicholas G Faturos; C Fernando Valenzuela
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 2.  The Current States, Challenges, Ongoing Efforts, and Future Perspectives of Pharmaceutical Excipients in Pediatric Patients in Each Country and Region.

Authors:  Jumpei Saito; Anjali Agrawal; Vandana Patravale; Anjali Pandya; Samuel Orubu; Min Zhao; Gavin P Andrews; Caroline Petit-Turcotte; Hannah Landry; Alysha Croker; Hidefumi Nakamura; Akimasa Yamatani; Smita Salunke
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-23

3.  Urinary metabolites of volatile organic compounds of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  Dina El-Metwally; Krista Chain; Matthew P Stefanak; Udeni Alwis; Benjamin C Blount; Judy S LaKind; Cynthia F Bearer
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.756

4.  Characterization of motor function in mice developmentally exposed to ethanol using the Catwalk system: Comparison with the triple horizontal bar and rotarod tests.

Authors:  Belkis Jacquez; Hyesun Choi; Clark W Bird; David N Linsenbardt; C Fernando Valenzuela
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Potentially harmful excipients in neonatal medications: a multicenter nationwide observational study in Japan.

Authors:  Jumpei Saito; Naomi Nadatani; Makoto Setoguchi; Masahiko Nakao; Hitomi Kimura; Mayuri Sameshima; Keiko Kobayashi; Hiroaki Matsumoto; Naoki Yoshikawa; Toshihiro Yokoyama; Hitomi Takahashi; Mei Suenaga; Ran Watanabe; Kinuko Imai; Mami Obara; Mari Hashimoto; Kazuhiro Yamamoto; Naoko Fujiwara; Wakako Sakata; Hiroaki Nagai; Takeshi Enokihara; Sayaka Katayama; Yuta Takahashi; Mariko Araki; Kanako Iino; Naoko Akiyama; Hiroki Katsu; Kumiko Fushimi; Tomoya Takeda; Mayumi Torimoto; Rina Kishi; Naoki Mitsuya; Rie Kihara; Yuki Hasegawa; Yukihiro Hamada; Toshimi Kimura; Masaki Wada; Ayano Tanzawa; Akimasa Yamatani
Journal:  J Pharm Health Care Sci       Date:  2021-07-01

6.  Availability of age-appropriate paediatric formulations in the Netherlands: the need in daily clinical practice remains.

Authors:  Anna van der Vossen; Sandra Buljaç; Kadir Akçay; Jan Dietert Brugma; Arnold Vulto; Lidwien Hanff
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2019-11-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.