Literature DB >> 29095410

Increased Lumbar Lordosis and Smaller Vertebral Cross-Sectional Area Are Associated With Spondylolysis.

Tishya A L Wren1, Skorn Ponrartana2, Patricia C Aggabao2, Ervin Poorghasamians2, David L Skaggs1, Vicente Gilsanz1,2,3.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A cross-sectional comparison of vertebral morphology and lumbar lordosis (LL) in adolescents with and without spondylolysis.
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that in addition to LL, vertebral cross-sectional area (CSA) is also associated with spondylolysis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recent data indicate that the CSA of the vertebral body is a determinant of LL, which has been shown to be associated with spondylolysis.
METHODS: Using magnetic resonance imaging, we compared the degree of LL from L1 to L5 and the CSA of the lumbar vertebrae in 35 adolescents (16 females and 19 males) with spondylolysis and 86 healthy controls (36 females and 50 males) of similar sex, age, height, and weight.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, height, weight, or vertebral height between subjects with and without spondylolysis, regardless of sex. In contrast, LL angle in spondylolysis patients was 57% and 51% greater in girls and boys with spondylolysis; 44.1 ± 10.4° versus 28.1 ± 9.8° and 34.8 ± 5.9° versus 23.0 ± 6.0° for girls and boys, respectively (both P's < 0.0001). Additionally, values for vertebral CSA were on average, 8% and 10% smaller in females and males with spondylolysis; 7.6 ± 0.8 cmversus 8.3 ± 1.1 cm and 8.4 ± 1.6 versus 9.3 ± 1.6 for girls and boys, respectively (both P's ≤ 0.039). Multiple linear and logistic regression analyses indicated that the CSA of the vertebral body was negatively associated with LL angle and an independent predictor of the presence of spondylolysis. This was true regardless of whether girls and boys were analyzed together or independently, and whether LL angle was measured from L1 to L5 or S1.
CONCLUSION: We provide evidence that patients with spondylolysis have increased LL and smaller vertebral CSA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29095410     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

Review 1.  Sexual Dimorphism and the Origins of Human Spinal Health.

Authors:  Vicente Gilsanz; Tishya A L Wren; Skorn Ponrartana; Stefano Mora; Clifford J Rosen
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  Correlation between isometric strength in five muscle groups and inclination angles of spine.

Authors:  Zoran Šarčević; Dragan Savić; Andreja Tepavčević
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Is intrinsic lumbar spine shape associated with lumbar disc degeneration? An exploratory study.

Authors:  Janet A Deane; Anastasia V Pavlova; Adrian K P Lim; Jennifer S Gregory; Richard M Aspden; Alison H McGregor
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Motor development in infancy and spine shape in early old age: Findings from a British birth cohort study.

Authors:  Fiona R Saunders; Jennifer S Gregory; Anastasia V Pavlova; Stella G Muthuri; Rebecca J Hardy; Kathryn R Martin; Rebecca J Barr; Judith E Adams; Diana Kuh; Richard M Aspden; Rachel Cooper; Alex Ireland
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 3.102

5.  REHABILITATION CONSIDERATIONS FOR SPONDYLOLYSIS IN THE YOUTH ATHLETE.

Authors:  Mitchell Selhorst; Michael Allen; Robyn McHugh; James MacDonald
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.