T Marjot1,2, E Sbardella3,2, A Moolla2, J M Hazlehurst2, G D Tan2, M Ainsworth1, J F L Cobbold1, J W Tomlinson2. 1. Translational Gastroenterology Unit, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK. 2. Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK. 3. Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Abstract
AIMS: To define the attitudes and current clinical practice of diabetes specialists with regard to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and, based on the results, implement an evidenced-based pathway for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease assessment. METHODS: An online survey was disseminated to diabetes specialists. Based on findings from this survey, we sought a local solution by launching an awareness campaign and implementing a screening algorithm across all diabetes clinics at a secondary/tertiary referral centre. RESULTS: A total of 133 diabetes specialists responded to the survey. Fewer than 5% of responders correctly assessed the prevalence and severity of advanced fibrotic non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in people with diabetes as 50-75%. Whilst most clinicians performed liver function tests, only 5.7% responded stating that they would use, or had used, a non-invasive algorithm to stage the severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Implementing a local non-alcoholic fatty liver disease awareness campaign and screening strategy using pre-printed blood request forms, we ensured that 100% (n=395) of all people with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes mellitus attending secondary/tertiary care diabetes clinics over a 6-month period were appropriately screened for advanced fibrotic non-alcoholic fatty liver disease using the Fib-4 index; 17.9% required further investigation or assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence and severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease are underestimated among diabetes specialists. The Fib-4 index can easily be incorporated into clinical practice in secondary/tertiary care to identify those individuals at risk of advanced fibrosis who require further assessment and who may benefit from a dedicated multidisciplinary approach to their management.
AIMS: To define the attitudes and current clinical practice of diabetes specialists with regard to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and, based on the results, implement an evidenced-based pathway for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease assessment. METHODS: An online survey was disseminated to diabetes specialists. Based on findings from this survey, we sought a local solution by launching an awareness campaign and implementing a screening algorithm across all diabetes clinics at a secondary/tertiary referral centre. RESULTS: A total of 133 diabetes specialists responded to the survey. Fewer than 5% of responders correctly assessed the prevalence and severity of advanced fibrotic non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in people with diabetes as 50-75%. Whilst most clinicians performed liver function tests, only 5.7% responded stating that they would use, or had used, a non-invasive algorithm to stage the severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Implementing a local non-alcoholic fatty liver disease awareness campaign and screening strategy using pre-printed blood request forms, we ensured that 100% (n=395) of all people with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes mellitus attending secondary/tertiary care diabetes clinics over a 6-month period were appropriately screened for advanced fibrotic non-alcoholic fatty liver disease using the Fib-4 index; 17.9% required further investigation or assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence and severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease are underestimated among diabetes specialists. The Fib-4 index can easily be incorporated into clinical practice in secondary/tertiary care to identify those individuals at risk of advanced fibrosis who require further assessment and who may benefit from a dedicated multidisciplinary approach to their management.
Authors: Robert J Pattison; James Phillip Esteban; Tomoki Sempokuya; Jakrin Kewcharoen; Sumodh Kalathil; Scott K Kuwada Journal: Hawaii J Health Soc Welf Date: 2020-06-01
Authors: Ahmad Moolla; Kenzo Motohashi; Thomas Marjot; Amelia Shard; Mark Ainsworth; Alastair Gray; Rury Holman; Michael Pavlides; John D Ryan; Jeremy W Tomlinson; Jeremy F Cobbold Journal: Frontline Gastroenterol Date: 2019-04-30
Authors: Rasika Pradeep Herath; Shirom R Siriwardana; Chanil D Ekanayake; Vikum Abeysekara; Sajith U A Kodithuwakku; Himali P Herath Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-04-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Marieke de Vries; Jan Westerink; Karin H A H Kaasjager; Harold W de Valk Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Valentin Blank; David Petroff; Sebastian Beer; Albrecht Böhlig; Maria Heni; Thomas Berg; Yvonne Bausback; Arne Dietrich; Anke Tönjes; Marcus Hollenbach; Matthias Blüher; Volker Keim; Johannes Wiegand; Thomas Karlas Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-10-27 Impact factor: 4.379