Lindsay K Dickerson1, Anne F Rositch1, Susan Lucas1, Susan C Harvey1. 1. , Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; , Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; , Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD; and , Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, University of Witwatersrand School of Medicine, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide, with high mortality in low- and middle-income countries because of a lack of detection, diagnosis, and treatment. With mammography unavailable, ultrasound offers an alternative for downstaging. The literature reports successful training in various domains, but a focus on the breast is novel. We assessed the feasibility (knowledge acquisition, perceived usefulness, and self-efficacy) of breast ultrasound training for nonphysician providers. METHODS: Training was implemented for 12 providers at Hlokomela Clinic in Hoedspruit, South Africa, over 3 weeks. Didactic presentations and example cases were followed by a presurvey and test (n = 12). All providers received hands-on training with nurses as models; five providers trained with patients. A post-test (n = 12) assessed knowledge acquisition and a postsurvey (n = 10) assessed perceived program usefulness and provider self-efficacy. RESULTS: The pre- to post-test averages improved by 68% in total and in four competencies (foundational knowledge, descriptive categories, benign v malignant, and lesion identification). On the postsurvey, providers expressed that ultrasound could significantly influence breast cancer detection (9.1 out of 10), treatment (7.9 out of 10), and survival (8.7 out of 10) in their community and endorsed moderate confidence in their scanning (6.3 out of 10) and interpreting abilities (5.6 out of 10). CONCLUSION: Our research supports the feasibility of breast ultrasound training as part of a breast education program in low- and middle-income countries. Pre- and post-test results and observed proficiency indicate that training nonphysician providers is achievable; postsurvey responses indicate program acceptance, community-based ownership, and provider self-efficacy with ultrasound. Future work may show that breast ultrasound is viable for early detection where mammography is unavailable.
PURPOSE: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide, with high mortality in low- and middle-income countries because of a lack of detection, diagnosis, and treatment. With mammography unavailable, ultrasound offers an alternative for downstaging. The literature reports successful training in various domains, but a focus on the breast is novel. We assessed the feasibility (knowledge acquisition, perceived usefulness, and self-efficacy) of breast ultrasound training for nonphysician providers. METHODS: Training was implemented for 12 providers at Hlokomela Clinic in Hoedspruit, South Africa, over 3 weeks. Didactic presentations and example cases were followed by a presurvey and test (n = 12). All providers received hands-on training with nurses as models; five providers trained with patients. A post-test (n = 12) assessed knowledge acquisition and a postsurvey (n = 10) assessed perceived program usefulness and provider self-efficacy. RESULTS: The pre- to post-test averages improved by 68% in total and in four competencies (foundational knowledge, descriptive categories, benign v malignant, and lesion identification). On the postsurvey, providers expressed that ultrasound could significantly influence breast cancer detection (9.1 out of 10), treatment (7.9 out of 10), and survival (8.7 out of 10) in their community and endorsed moderate confidence in their scanning (6.3 out of 10) and interpreting abilities (5.6 out of 10). CONCLUSION: Our research supports the feasibility of breast ultrasound training as part of a breast education program in low- and middle-income countries. Pre- and post-test results and observed proficiency indicate that training nonphysician providers is achievable; postsurvey responses indicate program acceptance, community-based ownership, and provider self-efficacy with ultrasound. Future work may show that breast ultrasound is viable for early detection where mammography is unavailable.
Authors: Roman Shyyan; Shahla Masood; Rajendra A Badwe; Kathleen M Errico; Laura Liberman; Vahit Ozmen; Helge Stalsberg; Hernan Vargas; László Vass Journal: Breast J Date: 2006 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Lori A Stolz; Krithika M Muruganandan; Mark C Bisanzo; Mugisha J Sebikali; Bradley A Dreifuss; Heather S Hammerstedt; Sara W Nelson; Irene Nayabale; Srikar Adhikari; Sachita P Shah Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Andrew B Ross; Kristen K DeStigter; Matthew Rielly; Sonia Souza; Gabriel Eli Morey; Melissa Nelson; Eric Z Silfen; Brian Garra; Alphonsus Matovu; Michael Grace Kawooya Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-10-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sachita Shah; Vicki E Noble; Irenee Umulisa; J M V Dushimiyimana; Gene Bukhman; Joia Mukherjee; Michael Rich; Henry Epino Journal: Int J Emerg Med Date: 2008-09-25
Authors: Rupali Sood; Anne F Rositch; Delaram Shakoor; Emily Ambinder; Kara-Lee Pool; Erica Pollack; Daniel J Mollura; Lisa A Mullen; Susan C Harvey Journal: J Glob Oncol Date: 2019-08
Authors: Julie M Clanahan; Sanjana Reddy; Robyn B Broach; Anne F Rositch; Benjamin O Anderson; E Paul Wileyto; Brian S Englander; Ari D Brooks Journal: JCO Glob Oncol Date: 2020-02