| Literature DB >> 29093727 |
Xiaoman She1,2, Lin Yu1, Guobing Lan1, Yafei Tang1, Zifu He1,2.
Abstract
Ralstonia solanacearum species complex is a devastating phytopathogen with an unusually wide host range, and new host plants are continuously being discovered. In June 2016, a new bacterial wilt on Cucurbita maxima was observed in Guangdong province, China. Initially, in the adult plant stage, several leaves of each plant withered suddenly and drooped; the plant then wilted completely, and the color of their vasculature changed to dark brown, ultimately causing the entire plant to die. Creamy-whitish bacterial masses were observed to ooze from crosscut stems of these diseased plants. To develop control strategies for C. maxima bacterial wilt, the causative pathogenic isolates were identified and characterized. Twenty-four bacterial isolates were obtained from diseased C. maxima plants, and 16S rRNA gene sequencing and pathogenicity analysis results indicated that the pathogen of C. maxima bacterial wilt was Ralstonia solanacearum. The results from DNA-based analysis, host range determination and bacteriological identification confirmed that the 24 isolates belonged to R. solanacearum phylotype I, race 1, and eight of these isolates belonged to biovar 3, while 16 belonged to biovar 4. Based on the results of partial egl gene sequence analysis, the 24 isolates clustered into three egl- sequence type groups, sequevars 17, 45, and 56. Sequevar 56 is a new sequevar which is described for the first time in this paper. An assessment of the resistance of 21 pumpkin cultivars revealed that C. moschata cv. Xiangyu1 is resistant to strain RS378, C. moschata cv. Xiangmi is moderately resistant to strain RS378, and 19 other pumpkin cultivars, including four C. maxima cultivars and 15 C. moschata cultivars, are susceptible to strain RS378. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of C. maxima bacterial wilt caused by R. solanacearum race 1 in the world. Our results provide valuable information for the further development of control strategies for C. maxima wilt disease.Entities:
Keywords: Cucurbita maxima; Ralstonia solanacearum; bacterial wilt; identification; phylotype I; sequevar
Year: 2017 PMID: 29093727 PMCID: PMC5651519 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01794
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Top leaf stunting (A), wilting plants (B), and plant death (C) of C. maxima in fields; (D) vascular discoloration of a C. maxima stem infected with R. solanacearum; (E) bacteria oozing from the crosscut site of a C. maxima stem; and (F) inoculated plants showing wilt symptoms in a greenhouse.
Strains used in this study.
| RS345 | 1 | 3 | I/17 | |
| RS346 | 1 | 3 | I/17 | |
| RS347 | 1 | 3 | I/17 | |
| RS348 | 1 | 3 | I/17 | |
| RS353 | 1 | 4 | I/56 | |
| RS355 | 1 | 4 | I/45 | |
| RS356 | 1 | 4 | I/45 | |
| RS357 | 1 | 4 | I/45 | |
| RS362 | 1 | 3 | I/56 | |
| RS364 | 1 | 3 | I/45 | |
| RS365 | 1 | 3 | I/45 | |
| RS366 | 1 | 3 | I/45 | |
| RS371 | 1 | 4 | I/56 | |
| RS372 | 1 | 4 | I/45 | |
| RS373 | 1 | 4 | I/45 | |
| RS374 | 1 | 4 | I/45 | |
| RS375 | 1 | 4 | I/45 | |
| RS376 | 1 | 4 | I/45 | |
| RS377 | 1 | 4 | I/45 | |
| RS378 | 1 | 4 | I/45 | |
| RS379 | 1 | 4 | I/45 | |
| RS380 | 1 | 4 | I/45 | |
| RS381 | 1 | 4 | I/45 | |
| RS382 | 1 | 4 | I/45 | |
| CFBP3059 | Eggplant | III/23 | Castillo and Greenberg, | |
| MAFF301552 | Tomato | IV/8 | ||
| DGBBC1125 | Potato | III/43 | ||
| CMR33 | Tomato | III/20 | ||
| CFBP1184 | II/4 | |||
| UW28 | Potato | II/3 | ||
| CFBP4787 | Potato | II/1 | ||
| CFBP1410 | II/2 | |||
| R288 | I/12 | Fegan and Prior, | ||
| R28 | IV/9 | Fegan and Prior, | ||
| Pss4 | Tomato | I/15 | Lin et al., | |
| CMR134 | Hucklererry | I/13 | Gabriel et al., | |
| CIP365 | Potato | I/45 | Prior and Fegan, | |
| Psi7 | Tomato | IV/10 | ||
| ACH732 | Tomato | IV/11 | ||
| CFBP6941 | Tomato | III/29 | Wicker et al., | |
| Pe3 | Pepper | I/44 | Xu et al., | |
| O3 | Olive tree | I/44 | ||
| Tm1301 | Tomato | I/44 | ||
| Tm2 | Tomato | I/14 | ||
| M4 | Mulberry | I/12 | ||
| Pe11 | Pepper | I/17 | ||
| PSS219 | Tomato | I/34 | ||
| Aoyu | / | Xu et al., Unpublished | ||
| CFBP734 | Potato | Poussier et al., | ||
| CFBP2047 | Tomato | |||
| CFBP2958 | Tomato | |||
| CFBP2972 | Potato | |||
| GMI1000 | Tomato | |||
| JT516 | Potato | |||
| NCPPB3987 | Potato | |||
| R292 | ||||
| CFBP3059 | Eggplant | Castillo and Greenberg, | ||
| MAFF301558 | Potato | |||
| NCPPB332 | Potato | |||
| M4 | Mulberry | Xu et al., | ||
| Pe11 | Pepper | |||
| Po2 | Potato | |||
| Po10 | Potato | |||
| Tb9 | Tobacco | |||
| Tm1 | Tomato | |||
| Tm10 | Tomato | |||
| Tm11 | Tomato | |||
| Tm82 | Tomato | |||
Figure 2Morphology of R. solanacearum biovar 3 isolate RS348 (A) and biovar 4 isolate RS371 (B) on TZC medium plates.
Pathogenicity of bacterial strains isolated from C. maxima.
| RS345 | 97.78 ± 3.85 | 86.67 ± 6.67 | 93.33 ± 6.67 | 86.67 ± 6.67 | 6.67 ± 0 | 13.33 ± 6.67 | 0.00 |
| RS346 | 97.78 ± 3.85 | 93.33 ± 6.67 | 80.00 ± 6.67 | 82.22 ± 16.78 | 6.67 ± 6.67 | 20.00 ± 6.67 | 0.00 |
| RS347 | 100.00 ± 0 | 100.00 ± 0 | 73.33 ± 6.67 | 86.67 ± 13.33 | 13.33 ± 6.67 | 26.67 ± 6.67 | 0.00 |
| RS348 | 97.78 ± 3.85 | 86.67 ± 11.55 | 86.67 ± 13.33 | 80.00 ± 20.00 | 6.67 ± 0 | 20.00 ± 6.67 | 0.00 |
| RS353 | 97.78 ± 3.85 | 93.33 ± 11.55 | 66.67 ± 13.33 | 66.67 ± 13.33 | 13.33 ± 6.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| RS355 | 95.56 ± 3.85 | 88.89 ± 10.18 | 80.00 ± 20.00 | 46.67 ± 20.00 | 6.67 ± 6.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| RS356 | 100.00 ± 0 | 93.33 ± 6.67 | 82.22 ± 7.70 | 53.33 ± 6.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| RS357 | 100.00 ± 0 | 84.44 ± 10.18 | 75.56 ± 16.78 | 60.00 ± 11.55 | 6.67 ± 6.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| RS362 | 100.00 ± 0 | 86.67 ± 13.33 | 86.67 ± 13.33 | 86.67 ± 13.33 | 13.33 ± 6.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| RS364 | 100.00 ± 0 | 86.67 ± 0 | 95.56 ± 7.70 | 80.00 ± 11.55 | 6.67 ± 0 | 6.67 ± 6.67 | 0.00 |
| RS365 | 100.00 ± 0 | 82.22 ± 16.78 | 80.00 ± 17.64 | 80.00 ± 17.64 | 26.67 ± 6.67 | 13.33 ± 0 | 0.00 |
| RS366 | 95.56 ± 3.85 | 93.33 ± 6.67 | 86.67 ± 13.33 | 66.67 ± 6.67 | 13.33 ± 6.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| RS371 | 100.00 ± 0 | 86.67 ± 6.67 | 73.33 ± 6.67 | 44.44 ± 7.70 | 10.00 ± 3.85 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| RS372 | 100.00 ± 0 | 73.33 ± 6.67 | 66.67 ± 6.67 | 53.33 ± 6.67 | 13.33 ± 3.85 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| RS373 | 100.00 ± 0 | 93.33 ± 11.55 | 80.00 ± 13.33 | 53.33 ± 6.67 | 6.67 ± 6.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| RS374 | 100.00 ± 0 | 86.67 ± 17.64 | 73.33 ± 17.64 | 26.67 ± 11.55 | 6.67 ± 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| RS375 | 100.00 ± 0 | 86.67 ± 13.33 | 93.33 ± 6.67 | 46.67 ± 6.67 | 13.33 ± 6.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| RS376 | 100.00 ± 0 | 80.00 ± 11.55 | 77.78 ± 10.18 | 26.67 ± 6.67 | 6.67 ± 6.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| RS377 | 100.00 ± 0 | 86.67 ± 13.33 | 93.33 ± 6.67 | 46.67 ± 6.67 | 6.67 ± 6.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| RS378 | 100.00 ± 0 | 93.33 ± 6.67 | 66.67 ± 6.67 | 33.33 ± 6.67 | 20.00 ± 6.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| RS379 | 100.00 ± 0 | 80.00 ± 13.33 | 80.00 ± 0 | 26.67 ± 6.67 | 6.67 ± 6.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| RS380 | 100.00 ± 0 | 93.33 ± 6.67 | 86.67 ± 6.67 | 46.67 ± 6.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| RS381 | 95.56 ± 3.85 | 86.67 ± 11.55 | 86.67 ± 17.64 | 33.33 ± 11.55 | 6.67 ± 6.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| RS382 | 95.56 ± 3.85 | 93.33 ± 6.67 | 93.33 ± 6.67 | 40.00 ± 11.55 | 6.67 ± 6.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| RS382 | 95.56 ± 3.85 | 93.33 ± 6.67 | 93.33 ± 6.67 | 40.00 ± 11.55 | 6.67 ± 6.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Disease incidence (DI) of diseased plants were assessed at 5 weeks after inoculation, calculated as DI = 100 × number of disease plants/15 inoculated plants.
Figure 3Phylogenetic analysis of 24 isolates from C. maxima and 23 related strains of R. solanacearum. The phylogenetic tree of egl gene partial sequences was constructed with MEGA 6.0 using the neighbor-joining method. The numbers at the tree branch points indicate the percent bootstrap support for 1,000 iterations.
Figure 4Phylogenetic analysis of 24 isolates from C. maxima and 21 related strains of R. solanacearum. The phylogenetic tree of hrpB gene partial sequences was constructed with MEGA 6.0 using the neighbor-joining method. The numbers at the tree branch points indicate the percent bootstrap support for 1,000 iterations.
Pathogenicity of strain RS378 of R. solanacearum on cultivars of C. maxima and C. moschata.
| Black rose 879 | 83.62 ± 9.95 | HS | |
| Longxindan | 88.08 ± 9.01 | HS | |
| Jinhongxi889 | 89.34 ± 5.23 | HS | |
| Red earth | 93.73 ± 5.69 | HS | |
| Xiangyu1 | 38.63 ± 13.43 | R | |
| Xiangmi | 57.88 ± 8.34 | MR | |
| Xiangyu101 | 60.46 ± 9.44 | S | |
| Pocket-size | 60.94 ± 5.41 | S | |
| 65.33 ± 3.07 | S | ||
| Yuemei NO.1 | 71.98 ± 11.02 | S | |
| Wushan | 75.48 ± 11.29 | S | |
| Super long pumpkin | 75.49 ± 2.31 | S | |
| Xiangyu2 | 77.50 ± 13.08 | S | |
| Butternut squash | 81.50 ± 11.90 | HS | |
| Jingou | 81.88 ± 3.92 | HS | |
| Zhongnan | 85.89 ± 6.42 | HS | |
| Jinling | 87.84 ± 5.50 | HS | |
| Xiangmi-Xiangyu | 88.34 ± 3.51 | HS | |
| Pumpkin King | 91.76 ± 1.87 | HS | |
| Jinniu NO.3 | 94.35 ± 3.24 | HS | |
| NO.3 | 94.92 ± 1.60 | HS |
Disease incidence (DI) of diseased plants were assessed at 5 weeks after inoculation, calculated as DI = 100 × number of disease plants/ total number inoculated plants of each plot experiment (30).
Resistance reaction (RR) of 21 cultivars to strain RS378 was evaluated based on DI, where HR, highly resistant; R, resistant; MR, moderately resistant; S, susceptible; and HS, highly susceptible.