| Literature DB >> 29093544 |
Waheed Ullah Khan1, Deyin Wang2, Wei Zhang3, Zuobin Tang1, Xinlong Ma1, Xin Ding1, Shanshan Du1, Yuhua Wang4.
Abstract
In the present work, we reported the luminescence of a green-emitting carbon dots (Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29093544 PMCID: PMC5665951 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-15054-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Photos of the green-emitting CDs under sunlight (left) and UV irradiation (right). (b) UV-Vis absorption, excitation and emission spectra of the obtained green-emitting CDs. (c) The emission spectra of green-emitting CDs under different excitations. (d) Decay curve of the prepared green-emitting CDs under 420 nm exictation.
Figure 2(a) The TEM and (inset) HRTEM image (b) and size distribution of the green-emitting CDs.
Figure 3(a) The XRD profile of the prepared green-emitting CDs. (b) FT-IR spectrum of Urea, diammonium hydrogen citrate (DAHC) and obtained green-emitting CDs.
Figure 4(a) Full XPS spectra of the obtained CDs. (b–d) High-resolution XPS spectra of the C 1 s, N 1 s and O1s of the obtained green-emitting CDs, respectively.
Figure 5(a) photographs of the green-emitting CDs without and with Fe 3+ ions under 365 nm UV lamp irradiation. (b) Emission intensity of the green-emitting CDs after adding different metal ions with same concentration. (c) The photoluminescence spectra of green-emitting CDs with different concentration of Fe3+ from 25 to 300 µM. (d) The dependence of f/f0 on the concentration of Fe3+.
Analytical performances of recent reported sensors for the detection of Fe3+.
| Synthetic method | Precursor | Linear range | Emission range/QYs % | Limit of detection (LOD) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydrothermal method | alginic acid and ethanediamine | 0.0–0.05 mM | Blue/0.7 | 10.98 μM |
|
| cellulose fibers | 25–250 μM | Blue/32.2 | 0.96 μM |
| |
| L-glutamate | 0–50 μM | Blue/17.8 | 4.67 μM |
| |
| potatoes | 1.0–5.0 μM and 5.0–50.0 μM | Blue/15 | 0.025 μM |
| |
| α-lipoic acid, sodium hydroxide and ethylenediamine | 0–500 μM | Blue/54.4 | 4 μM |
| |
| dopamine and ethanediamine | 50–300 μM | Blue-green/9.4 | 10.8 µM |
| |
| Electrochemical synthesis | graphite rods | 0–1 µM | Blue/NA | 2 nm |
|
| ethanol | 1–80 μM and 80–800 μM | Blue/10.04 | 0.04 µM |
| |
| Graphite electrode | 10–200 µM | Blue/11.2 | 1.8 µM |
| |
| Hummers method | GO nanosheets | 14.32–143.2 μM | Blue/0.7 | 17.9 μM |
|
| Microwave irradiation | Chitosan, glacial acetic acid and EDA | 0.179–32.22 | Blue/20.1 | 0.179 µM |
|
| Solid-state reaction | Diammonium hydrogen citrate and urea | 0–300 µM | Green/46.4 | 19 µM | This work |
Figure 6(a) Green-emitting CDs formed fingerprint under daylight (b) and 365 nm UV lamp irradiation. (c) Fluorescent characters on filter paper under UV excitation.
Figure 7(a) Cellular toxicity assessment of green-emitting CDs. (b) Bright field image (c and d) Confocal fluorescent images of the green-emitting CDs under 405 nm laser excitation.