Literature DB >> 29093304

Baseline Profile of Participants in the Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS).

Takehiro Michikawa1, Hiroshi Nitta1, Shoji F Nakayama1, Shin Yamazaki1, Tomohiko Isobe1, Kenji Tamura1, Eiko Suda1, Masaji Ono1, Junzo Yonemoto1, Miyuki Iwai-Shimada1, Yayoi Kobayashi1, Go Suzuki1, Toshihiro Kawamoto1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS), known as Ecochil-Chosa in Japan, is a nationwide birth cohort study investigating the environmental factors that might affect children's health and development. We report the baseline profiles of the participating mothers, fathers, and their children.
METHODS: Fifteen Regional Centres located throughout Japan were responsible for recruiting women in early pregnancy living in their respective recruitment areas. Self-administered questionnaires and medical records were used to obtain such information as demographic factors, lifestyle, socioeconomic status, environmental exposure, medical history, and delivery information. In the period up to delivery, we collected bio-specimens, including blood, urine, hair, and umbilical cord blood. Fathers were also recruited, when accessible, and asked to fill in a questionnaire and to provide blood samples.
RESULTS: The total number of pregnancies resulting in delivery was 100,778, of which 51,402 (51.0%) involved program participation by male partners. Discounting pregnancies by the same woman, the study included 95,248 unique mothers and 49,189 unique fathers. The 100,778 pregnancies involved a total of 101,779 fetuses and resulted in 100,148 live births. The coverage of children in 2013 (the number of live births registered in JECS divided by the number of all live births within the study areas) was approximately 45%. Nevertheless, the data on the characteristics of the mothers and children we studied showed marked similarity to those obtained from Japan's 2013 Vital Statistics Survey.
CONCLUSIONS: Between 2011 and 2014, we established one of the largest birth cohorts in the world.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Japan; birth cohort; environmental chemicals; pregnant women; profile

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29093304      PMCID: PMC5792233          DOI: 10.2188/jea.JE20170018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0917-5040            Impact factor:   3.211


INTRODUCTION

Publicity surrounding diseases caused by environmental pollution, such as Minamata disease (mercury poisoning) and Itai-Itai disease (cadmium poisoning),[1] ensures that most people know of the detrimental effects on health of highly concentrated chemicals. Japan is not as heavily polluted with such chemicals as it once was, but chemicals are still widely used; discussions now center on the effects of less concentrated chemicals in the environment on human health. The effects of environmental pollution on children’s health, in particular, is of international concern, and the topic has been discussed at the G7/G8 Environment Ministers’ Meeting.[2] In response, the Japanese Ministry of the Environment proposed a nationwide birth cohort study involving 100,000 mother-child pairs (and fathers, if accessible), and the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS; Ecochil-Chosa in Japanese) was launched in 2011 to evaluate the effects of exposure to chemicals during the fetal stage and in early childhood on children’s health and development; follow-up is planned until the children are 13 years of age.[3] Several secondary studies using data on approximately 10,000 women who gave birth in 2011 (the first year of recruitment) have already been published in peer-reviewed journals.[4]–[10] Recruitment for the study was closed in March 2014, and the birth data were finalized for processing. This paper summarizes the baseline profiles of all participants (mothers, children, and fathers) at the start of the program.

METHODS

Study participants

Details of the JECS concept and design have been published elsewhere.[3] Briefly, JECS is funded directly by Japan’s Ministry of the Environment and involves collaboration between the Programme Office (National Institute for Environmental Studies), the Medical Support Centre (National Centre for Child Health and Development), and 15 Regional Centres (Hokkaido, Miyagi, Fukushima, Chiba, Kanagawa, Koshin, Toyama, Aichi, Kyoto, Osaka, Hyogo, Tottori, Kochi, Fukuoka, and South Kyushu/Okinawa). Each Regional Centre determined its own study area, consisting of one or more local administrative units (cities, towns or villages) (eTable 1), and was responsible for recruiting women in early pregnancy who resided in its study area. Between January 2011 and March 2014, we contacted pregnant women via cooperating health care providers and/or local government offices issuing Maternal and Child Health Handbooks and registered those willing to participate. The women’s partners (fathers) were also approached, whenever possible, and encouraged to participate. Several Regional Centres later expanded their study areas, because they learned that significant numbers of women residing in adjacent areas gave birth at cooperating health care providers. The Fukushima Centre’s study area was expanded to include the whole of Fukushima Prefecture because of concerns over the effects on health of radioactive fallout from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant after the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami.

Assessments during pregnancy and at delivery

Questionnaires

Self-administered questionnaires, which were completed by the women during the first trimester and second/third trimester, were used to collect information on demographic factors, medical and obstetric history, physical and mental health, lifestyle, occupation, environmental exposure at home and in the workplace, housing conditions, and socioeconomic status. Most of the questionnaires were distributed to women attending prenatal examinations, but some were sent by post. Completed questionnaires were returned by hand on subsequent prenatal visits or by post. When possible, those who gave incomplete answers were interviewed face-to-face or by telephone. Additionally, the mothers were interviewed about drug use before and during pregnancy. Between the mothers’ early pregnancy and 1 month after delivery, their male partners were asked to complete a questionnaire covering demographic factors, medical history, physical and mental health, lifestyle, occupation, and environment exposure at home and in the workplace. The survey method was the same as that for the mothers.

Medical record transcriptions

Following standard operating procedures, physicians, midwives/nurses, and/or research coordinators transcribed relevant information (medical history, including gravidity and related complications; parity; maternal anthropometry; and infant physical examinations) from medical records.

Bio-specimens

Bio-specimens (blood, urine, hair, and umbilical cord blood) were collected during pregnancy and at delivery, and were stored in −80°C freezers, liquid nitrogen tanks, or ordinary-temperature under controlled temperature and humidity. Detailed information about these bio-specimens will be published separately.

Ethical issues

The Ministry of the Environment’s Institutional Review Board on Epidemiological Studies, and the Ethics Committees of all participating institutions approved the JECS protocol. All participating mothers and fathers had provided written informed consent.

Statistical analysis

In this paper, we summarized the following characteristics. Maternal profiles, including age, marital status, family composition, and passive smoking (presence of smokers at home), were obtained from the first trimester questionnaire. Information on educational background and household income was collected from the second/third trimester questionnaire. Questions about smoking habits, alcohol consumption (based on the question used in the Japan Public Health Centre-based prospective Study for the Next Generation [JPHC-NEXT]),[11] and occupation in early pregnancy (based on the 2009 Japan Standard Occupational Classification)[12] were included in both questionnaires, so data obtained from the first trimester questionnaire was supplemented with data from the second/third trimester questionnaire.[4] When a participant chose “workers not classifiable by occupation” in the occupation section and then specified an occupation in the comment box, we chose an appropriate job category for that person. Such information as pre-pregnancy height and weight (used for calculating body mass index [BMI] as weight [kg]/height squared [m2]), and parity was primarily taken from medical records. When required data were missing from the medical records, questionnaire data were used. We also summarized profile data on male partners (fathers) via questionnaire: their age and their occupation during their partner’s early pregnancy, along with smoking habits, alcohol consumption, BMI, and educational background (as reported by the female partners). Profile data from medical record on the children were summarized, including delivery information (live birth or not, singleton or multiple birth, gestational age at birth, sex, type of delivery) and anthropometry at birth. The present study is based on the dataset of jecs-ag-20160424, which was released in June 2016. The birth information in this dataset is not supplemented by any information from the national Vital Statistics Survey. The participants’ profiles were processed in aggregate and also separately for each of the 15 Regional Centres. All analyses were performed with Stata 13 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA).

RESULTS

A JECS cohort flow chart from enrolment to delivery is shown in Figure 1. The study covers a total of 103,099 pregnancies. Excluding the 2,321 pregnancies with no subsequent delivery record, we were left with 100,778 pregnancies resulting in delivery, of which 51,402 (51.0%) involved program participation by male partners. Discounting pregnancies by the same woman, the study involved 95,248 unique mothers and 49,189 unique fathers. The 100,778 pregnancies involved 101,779 fetuses and resulted in 100,148 live births, 291 stillbirths (fetal deaths occurring at ≥22 weeks of gestation), and 1,340 miscarriages. It is difficult to accurately assess the coverage of the children (the number of live births registered in JECS divided by the number of all live births within the study areas) for the entire study period because we recruited women in early pregnancy and later expanded the study areas. In 2013, when recruitment was largely stabilized, however, the child coverage was approximately 45%.
Figure 1.

A Japan Environment and Children’s Study cohort flow chart from enrolment to delivery

Table 1 shows the response rates of the mothers, fathers, and children for each survey item. The questionnaire and medical record response rates were nearly 100%. The response rates for maternal blood and urine sampling were higher in the second/third trimesters (95.4% for blood and 95.6% for urine) than in the first trimester (88.7% and 88.5%, respectively), mainly because approximately 8% of the pregnancies were registered during the second/third trimesters. Since the first trimester questionnaire was also given to these late participants, its response rate was 98.5%. Although we prioritized the storage of cord blood samples in public cord blood banks, the samples collected from the mothers represented 87.3% of the pregnancies surveyed.
Table 1.

The response rates of the mothers, fathers, and children for each survey item

 1st trimester2nd/3rd trimesterBirth



n%n%n%
Mother (100,778 pregnancies)
 Questionnaire and interview about drug use99,30098.597,96997.2  
 Medical record transcription100,61199.8  100,778100
 Blood89,43488.796,09895.494,98594.3
 Urine89,19088.596,34195.6  
 Hair    Xa 
Father (51,402 with pregnant partners)
 Questionnaire50,01497.3b    
 Blood49,66196.6b    
Child (n = 101,779)
 Medical record transcription    101,779100
 Cord blood    88,00987.3c
 Blood    Xa 

aWe have not yet evaluated the data.

bBetween the mother’s early pregnancy and 1 month after delivery, we distributed a questionnaire to fathers, and collected blood from them.

cResponse rate of 100,778 pregnancies.

aWe have not yet evaluated the data. bBetween the mother’s early pregnancy and 1 month after delivery, we distributed a questionnaire to fathers, and collected blood from them. cResponse rate of 100,778 pregnancies. Baseline profiles of the mothers (mean age at delivery, 31.2; standard deviation [SD], 5.1) are shown in Table 2. Most were married (95.6%) and resided with their partner (and their child[ren]) (75.1%). The proportion of those who had received at least 13 years of education was 63.7% for the mothers and 55.8% for the fathers (mother-reported). The distribution of household income peaked at 2 to <4 million Japanese-yen/year (34.6%) and 4 to <6 million yen/year (33.1%). The mothers’ most common occupations in early pregnancy were homemaker (28.8%) and professional/engineering workers (22.3%). Smokers and alcohol drinkers during early pregnancy accounted for 18.2% and 45.9%, respectively. The distribution of baseline profiles did not substantially differ between the total population (about 100,000 mothers) and the sub-population of about 50,000 mothers with male partners participating in the study.
Table 2.

Baseline profiles of the mothers in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study, 2011–2014

VariablesTotalWith male partners participating


Number ofvalid responsen(%)Number ofvalid responsen(%)
Number of pregnancies100,778  51,402  
Age at delivery, years100,768  51,396  
 Total, mean (SD) 100,76831.2 (5.1) 51,39631.1 (5.0)
 <20 8930.9 3740.7
 20–24 9,2299.2 4,5748.9
 25–29 27,68627.5 14,60428.4
 30–34 35,57135.3 18,38735.8
 35–39 22,71322.5 11,19821.8
 ≥40 4,6764.6 2,2594.4
Marital status98,312  50,624  
 Married 94,03295.6 49,11997.0
 Unmarried 3,4443.5 1,2962.6
 Divorced/widowed 8360.9 2090.4
Family composition98,123  50,521  
 One-person households 6530.7 2160.4
 A couple only 30,10530.7 17,38634.4
 A couple with their child(ren) 43,55644.4 20,76941.1
 A parent with his or her child(ren) 8480.9 2510.5
 Other households 22,96123.4 11,89923.6
Educational background, years97,004  50,181  
 <10 4,7044.8 2,0724.1
 10–12 30,54431.5 15,40730.7
 13–16 60,33362.2 31,90263.6
 ≥17 1,4231.5 8001.6
Paternal educational background, years96,387  50,064  
 <10 7,0497.3 2,8585.7
 10–12 35,51536.8 18,36436.7
 13–16 49,48351.3 26,40552.7
 ≥17 4,3404.5 2,4374.9
Household income, million Japanese-yen/year90,596  47,226  
 <2 5,1405.7 2,3004.9
 2 to <4 31,31134.6 16,22234.4
 4 to <6 29,94233.1 15,91533.7
 6 to <8 14,41015.9 7,66816.2
 8 to <10 5,9266.5 3,1466.7
 ≥10 3,8674.3 1,9754.2
Occupation in early pregnancy97,935  50,506  
 Administrative and managerial workers 5670.6 2820.6
 Professional and engineering workers 21,85722.3 12,06023.9
 Clerical workers 16,43216.8 8,56917.0
 Sales workers 5,7445.9 2,7635.5
 Service workers 15,52715.9 7,70315.3
 Security workers 2420.2 1380.3
 Agriculture, forestry and fishery workers 4540.5 2350.5
 Manufacturing process workers 3,3763.4 1,8893.7
 Transport and machine operation workers 1770.2 950.2
 Construction and mining workers 710.1 380.1
 Carrying, cleaning, packaging, and related workers 6780.7 2900.6
 Homemaker 28,22528.8 14,24628.2
 Others (students, inoccupation, workers not classifiable by occupation) 4,5854.7 2,1984.4
Smoking habits99,053  50,897  
 Never smoked 57,44458.0 30,26859.5
 Ex-smokers who quit before pregnancy 23,57123.8 12,01123.6
 Smokers during early pregnancy 18,03818.2 8,61816.9
Passive smoking (presence of smokers at home)a79,910  41,849  
 No 66,48683.2 35,67585.2
 Yes 13,42416.8 6,17414.8
Alcohol consumption99,149  50,937  
 Never drank 34,27934.6 17,66634.7
 Ex-drinkers who quit before pregnancy 19,39219.6 9,79219.2
 Drinkers during early pregnancy 45,47845.9 23,47946.1
Body mass index before pregnancy100,538  51,358  
 <18.5 kg/m2 16,27216.2 8,06615.7
 18.5–24.9 kg/m2 73,41673.0 37,57273.2
 ≥25 kg/m2 10,85010.8 5,72011.1
Parity100,288  51,212  
 0 41,57341.5 23,28045.5
 1 38,28138.2 18,55536.2
 ≥2 20,43420.4 9,37718.3

SD, standard deviation.

aExcluding smokers during early pregnancy.

SD, standard deviation. aExcluding smokers during early pregnancy. The mean age of the fathers when their partners gave birth was 32.9 (SD, 5.9) years (Table 3); 30.2% were engaged in the professional/engineering works, 47.7% had smoked during their partner’s early pregnancy, and 75.0% had drunk alcohol.
Table 3.

Baseline profiles of the fathers in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study, 2011–2014

VariablesNumber ofvalid responsen(%)
Number of their partner’s pregnancies51,402  
Age when their children were born, years51,104  
 Total, mean (SD) 51,10432.9 (5.9)
 <20 1980.4
 20–24 3,1736.2
 25–29 11,65922.8
 30–34 16,86733.0
 35–39 12,73824.9
 ≥40 6,46912.7
Occupation during their partner’s early pregnancy49,700  
 Administrative and managerial workers 2,0294.1
 Professional and engineering workers 15,00130.2
 Clerical workers 4,6279.3
 Sales workers 5,36610.8
 Service workers 5,65011.4
 Security workers 2,0654.2
 Agriculture, forestry and fishery workers 9291.9
 Manufacturing process workers 6,74413.6
 Transport and machine operation workers 2,0614.1
 Construction and mining workers 3,4136.9
 Carrying, cleaning, packaging, and related workers 8281.7
 Homemaker 660.1
 Others (students, inoccupation, workers not classifiableby occupation) 9211.9
Smoking habits49,815  
 Never smoked 14,28428.7
 Ex-smokers who quit before their partner’s pregnancy 11,75723.6
 Smokers during their partner’s early pregnancy 23,77447.7
Alcohol consumption49,839  
 Never drank 10,58821.2
 Ex-drinkers 1,8733.8
 Drinkers 37,37875.0
Body mass index49,532  
 <18.5 kg/m2 1,7973.6
 18.5–24.9 kg/m2 34,20469.1
 ≥25 kg/m2 13,53127.3

SD, standard deviation.

SD, standard deviation. Table 4 shows baseline profiles of the 100,148 live births. The secondary sex ratio (male/female) was 1.05. Among the 98,259 singleton births, the mean anthropometric values at birth were weight: 3,023 (SD, 420) g, height: 48.9 (SD, 2.3) cm, head circumference: 33.2 (SD, 1.5) cm, and chest circumference: 31.8 (SD, 1.8) cm. The distributions of baseline profiles did not substantially differ between the total population (about 100,000 children) and the sub-population (about 50,000 children with participating fathers).
Table 4.

Baseline profiles of the children in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study, 2011–2014

VariablesTotalWith participating fathers


Numberof valid responsen Numberof valid responsen 
Number of live births100,148  51,539  
 Singleton births, n % 98,25998.1 50,56498.1
Gestational age at birth100,148  51,539  
 Total, weeks, mean (SD) 100,14839.2 (1.7) 51,53939.2 (1.6)
 Preterm births (<37 weeks), n % 5,5995.6 2,6445.1
 Term births (37–41 weeks), n % 94,32294.2 48,76394.6
 Postterm births (≥42 weeks), n % 2270.2 1320.3
Sex100,137  51,534  
 Male, n % 51,31651.2 26,27951.0
 Female, n % 48,82148.8 25,25549.0
Type of delivery99,884  51,413  
 Vaginal, n % 79,78379.9 41,21280.2
 Caesarean, n % 20,10120.1 10,20119.8
Birth weight, g100,071  51,509  
 Total, mean (SD) 100,0713,008 (434) 51,5093,015 (425)
 Singleton births98,182  50,534  
  Total, mean (SD) 98,1823,023 (420) 50,5343,030 (410)
  Male, mean (SD) 50,3123,065 (426) 25,7793,074 (415)
  Female, mean (SD) 47,8632,979 (408) 24,7512,984 (399)
  Low birth weight, <2,500 g, n % 7,9818.1 3,8567.6
Birth height, cm99,785  51,336  
 Total, mean (SD) 99,78548.8 (2.4) 51,33648.9 (2.3)
 Singleton births97,912  50,368  
  Total, mean (SD) 97,91248.9 (2.3) 50,36849.0 (2.2)
  Male, mean (SD) 50,16649.2 (2.3) 25,69049.3 (2.2)
  Female, mean (SD) 47,74048.6 (2.3) 24,67548.7 (2.2)
Birth head circumference, cm99,538  51,222  
 Total, mean (SD) 99,53833.2 (1.5) 51,22233.2 (1.5)
 Singleton births97,692  50,265  
  Total, mean (SD) 97,69233.2 (1.5) 50,26533.2 (1.5)
  Male, mean (SD) 50,05433.4 (1.5) 25,63533.4 (1.5)
  Female, mean (SD) 47,63333.0 (1.5) 24,62733.0 (1.4)
Birth chest circumference, cm99,489  51,198  
 Total, mean (SD) 99,48931.7 (1.9) 51,19831.7 (1.8)
 Singleton births97,653  50,245  
  Total, mean (SD) 97,65331.8 (1.8) 50,24531.8 (1.8)
  Male, mean (SD) 50,03431.9 (1.9) 25,62531.9 (1.8)
  Female, mean (SD) 47,61431.6 (1.8) 24,61731.6 (1.8)

SD, standard deviation.

SD, standard deviation. The baseline profiles of the mothers, fathers, and children for each Regional Centre are shown in eTable 2, eTable 3, and eTable 4.

DISCUSSION

We began registering the participants for the JECS in 2011 and completed registration in 2014, establishing one of the largest birth cohorts in the world. This paper outlines the baseline profiles of the JECS participants. One strength of this study is that it covers the whole of Japan, from Hokkaido in the north to Okinawa in the south. Although the child coverage was approximately 45% in 2013, the selected characteristics of the mothers and children were comparable with those obtained in the national survey (Table 5).[13],[14] For example, the proportions of low birth weight (<2,500 g) were 8.2% for JECS in 2013 and 8.3% in the 2013 national Vital Statistics Survey.[13] The fetal death rate in JECS (3.1 per 1,000 live births and fetal deaths at ≥22 weeks of gestation) was also similar to that in the national survey (3.0).[13] Therefore, we think we can extrapolate the JECS results to the Japanese general population. Second, the large amount of information collected via questionnaires and/or medical records allows us to investigate the associations between environmental exposure and outcomes after controlling for many covariates, such as lifestyle and physical and social factors. Third, most of the participants provided bio-specimens during pregnancy and at delivery, which will be used to identify new substances in the environment posing health hazards and for gene analyses.
Table 5.

The selected characteristics of the Japan Environment Children’s Study (JECS) and the national Vital Statistics in 2013

 JECSin 2013Total population ofJECS, 2011–2014Vital Statisticsin 2013[13]



(%)(%)(%)
Characteristics of the mothers
 Age at delivery, years
  20–2936.536.636.3
  30–3957.857.857.8
 Parity
  041.041.5a
Characteristics of the children
 Live births
  Singleton births98.098.198.1
 Gestational age at birth, weeks
  Term births (37–41 weeks)94.294.294.0
 Sex
  Male51.251.251.2
  Female48.848.848.8
 Type of delivery
  Caesarean20.320.119.7b
 Birth weight, gc
  <2,5008.28.18.3
  2,500 to <3,00038.538.739.0
  3,000 to <3,50042.242.141.8
  ≥3,50011.211.110.9

aIn Vital Statistics,[13] birth order has been reported. The proportion of first child among the number of the total births was 46.7% in 2013.

bSurveys of Medical Institutions in 2014.[14]

cSingleton births only.

aIn Vital Statistics,[13] birth order has been reported. The proportion of first child among the number of the total births was 46.7% in 2013. bSurveys of Medical Institutions in 2014.[14] cSingleton births only. Some weaknesses also warrant consideration. First, only about half of the eligible men participated. However, the profiles of the mothers and children did not essentially differ between the total population and the sub-population with paternal participation. Another limitation is that the majority of women were recruited after the latter half of the first trimester. Therefore, we should keep in mind that we did not cover all early miscarriages. In addition, in spite of the large sample size, it is difficult to examine the associations of environmental exposure to chemicals with rare perinatal outcomes, such as amniotic embolism, sudden infant death syndrome, and many individual congenital anomalies. Information about JECS is available to the public at http://www.env.go.jp/chemi/ceh/. We are following up the participating children by distributing guardian-administered questionnaires every 6 months, starting when the children become 6 months of age, and we are carrying out further chemical analyses of approximately 100,000 blood samples taken from mothers during their second/third trimesters for heavy metals, including lead, cadmium, mercury, manganese, and selenium; these analyses will be completed in 2017. We will soon be able to report on any associations of exposure to heavy metals during pregnancy with pregnancy and reproductive outcomes (eg, preterm delivery, birth weight, and secondary sex ratio).
  9 in total

1.  Incidence of Domestic Violence Against Pregnant Females After the Great East Japan Earthquake in Miyagi Prefecture: The Japan Environment and Children's Study.

Authors:  Kasumi Sakurai; Hidekazu Nishigori; Toshie Nishigori; Satoshi Mizuno; Taku Obara; Noriyuki Iwama; Zen Watanabe; Mami Ishikuro; Nozomi Tatsuta; Ichiko Nishijima; Junichi Sugawara; Ikuma Fujiwara; Takahiro Arima; Shinichi Kuriyama; Hirohito Metoki; Fumiaki Takahashi; Kunihiko Nakai; Nobuo Yaegashi
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 1.385

2.  Prevalence and determinants of inadequate use of folic acid supplementation in Japanese pregnant women: the Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS).

Authors:  Taku Obara; Hidekazu Nishigori; Toshie Nishigori; Hirohito Metoki; Mami Ishikuro; Nozomi Tatsuta; Satoshi Mizuno; Kasumi Sakurai; Ichiko Nishijima; Yuriko Murai; Ikuma Fujiwara; Takahiro Arima; Kunihiko Nakai; Nariyasu Mano; Nobuo Yaegashi; Shinichi Kuriyama
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2016-05-26

3.  Association between social capital and the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus: An interim report of the Japan Environment and Children's Study.

Authors:  Satoshi Mizuno; Hidekazu Nishigori; Takashi Sugiyama; Fumiaki Takahashi; Noriyuki Iwama; Zen Watanabe; Kasumi Sakurai; Mami Ishikuro; Taku Obara; Nozomi Tatsuta; Ichiko Nishijima; Ikuma Fujiwara; Takahiro Arima; Shinichi Kuriyama; Hirohito Metoki; Kunihiko Nakai; Hidekuni Inadera; Nobuo Yaegashi
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 5.602

4.  Psychological distress during pregnancy in Miyagi after the Great East Japan Earthquake: The Japan Environment and Children's Study.

Authors:  Zen Watanabe; Noriyuki Iwama; Hidekazu Nishigori; Toshie Nishigori; Satoshi Mizuno; Kasumi Sakurai; Mami Ishikuro; Taku Obara; Nozomi Tatsuta; Ichiko Nishijima; Ikuma Fujiwara; Kunihiko Nakai; Takahiro Arima; Takashi Takeda; Junichi Sugawara; Shinichi Kuriyama; Hirohito Metoki; Nobuo Yaegashi
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.839

5.  Rationale and study design of the Japan environment and children's study (JECS).

Authors:  Toshihiro Kawamoto; Hiroshi Nitta; Katsuyuki Murata; Eisaku Toda; Naoya Tsukamoto; Manabu Hasegawa; Zentaro Yamagata; Fujio Kayama; Reiko Kishi; Yukihiro Ohya; Hirohisa Saito; Haruhiko Sago; Makiko Okuyama; Tsutomu Ogata; Susumu Yokoya; Yuji Koresawa; Yasuyuki Shibata; Shoji Nakayama; Takehiro Michikawa; Ayano Takeuchi; Hiroshi Satoh
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Association Between Maternal Smoking During Pregnancy and Birth Weight: An Appropriately Adjusted Model From the Japan Environment and Children's Study.

Authors:  Kohta Suzuki; Ryoji Shinohara; Miri Sato; Sanae Otawa; Zentaro Yamagata
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 3.211

7.  The Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS): A Preliminary Report on Selected Characteristics of Approximately 10 000 Pregnant Women Recruited During the First Year of the Study.

Authors:  Takehiro Michikawa; Hiroshi Nitta; Shoji F Nakayama; Masaji Ono; Junzo Yonemoto; Kenji Tamura; Eiko Suda; Hiroyasu Ito; Ayano Takeuchi; Toshihiro Kawamoto
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 3.211

8.  Validity of Short and Long Self-Administered Food Frequency Questionnaires in Ranking Dietary Intake in Middle-Aged and Elderly Japanese in the Japan Public Health Center-Based Prospective Study for the Next Generation (JPHC-NEXT) Protocol Area.

Authors:  Yuta Yokoyama; Ribeka Takachi; Junko Ishihara; Yuri Ishii; Shizuka Sasazuki; Norie Sawada; Yurie Shinozawa; Junta Tanaka; Erika Kato; Kaori Kitamura; Kazutoshi Nakamura; Shoichiro Tsugane
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-04-09       Impact factor: 3.211

9.  Relationship between hyperemesis gravidarum and small-for-gestational-age in the Japanese population: the Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS).

Authors:  Seiichi Morokuma; Mototsugu Shimokawa; Kiyoko Kato; Masafumi Sanefuji; Eiji Shibata; Mayumi Tsuji; Ayako Senju; Toshihiro Kawamoto; Koichi Kusuhara
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.007

  9 in total
  113 in total

1.  Lack of concern about body image and health during pregnancy linked to excessive gestational weight gain and small-for-gestational-age deliveries: the Japan Environment and Children's Study.

Authors:  Naw Awn J-P; Marina Minami; Masamitsu Eitoku; Nagamasa Maeda; Mikiya Fujieda; Narufumi Suganuma
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Determinants of Alcohol Consumption in Women Before and After Awareness of Conception.

Authors:  Kazue Ishitsuka; Kiwako Hanada-Yamamoto; Hidetoshi Mezawa; Mayako Saito-Abe; Mizuho Konishi; Yukihiro Ohya
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2020-02

3.  Soy consumption and incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus: the Japan Environment and Children's Study.

Authors:  Jia-Yi Dong; Takashi Kimura; Satoyo Ikehara; Meishan Cui; Yoko Kawanishi; Tadashi Kimura; Kimiko Ueda; Hiroyasu Iso
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 5.614

4.  Changes in Dietary Intake in Pregnant Women from Periconception to Pregnancy in the Japan Environment and Children's Study: A Nationwide Japanese Birth Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kazue Ishitsuka; Satoshi Sasaki; Kiwako Yamamoto-Hanada; Hidetoshi Mezawa; Mizuho Konishi; Yukihiro Ohya
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2020-03

5.  Infantile neuroblastoma and maternal occupational exposure to medical agents.

Authors:  Yuhki Koga; Masafumi Sanefuji; Syunichiro Toya; Utako Oba; Kentaro Nakashima; Hiroaki Ono; Shunsuke Yamamoto; Maya Suzuki; Yuri Sonoda; Masanobu Ogawa; Hiroyuki Yamamoto; Koichi Kusuhara; Shouichi Ohga
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.756

6.  Teenage pregnancy as a risk factor for placental abruption: Findings from the prospective Japan environment and children's study.

Authors:  Hyo Kyozuka; Tsuyoshi Murata; Toma Fukusda; Akiko Yamaguchi; Aya Kanno; Shun Yasuda; Akiko Sato; Yuka Ogata; Yuta Endo; Mitsuaki Hosoya; Seiji Yasumura; Koichi Hashimoto; Hidekazu Nishigori; Keiya Fujimori
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Association between maternal employment status during pregnancy and risk of depressive symptomatology 1 month after childbirth: the Japan Environment and Children's Study.

Authors:  Yuri Aochi; Kaori Honjo; Takashi Kimura; Satoyo Ikehara; Hiroyasu Iso
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Paternal childcare at 6 months and risk of maternal psychological distress at 1 year after delivery: The Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS).

Authors:  Haruka Kasamatsu; Akiko Tsuchida; Kenta Matsumura; Kei Hamazaki; Hidekuni Inadera
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.361

9.  Long-term outcomes of children with neonatal transfer: the Japan Environment and Children's Study.

Authors:  Katsuya Hirata; Kimiko Ueda; Kazuko Wada; Satoyo Ikehara; Kanami Tanigawa; Tadashi Kimura; Keiichi Ozono; Hiroyasu Iso
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.183

10.  Urinary Metabolites of Organophosphate Pesticides among Pregnant Women Participating in the Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS).

Authors:  Yukiko Nishihama; Shoji F Nakayama; Tomohiko Isobe; Chau-Ren Jung; Miyuki Iwai-Shimada; Yayoi Kobayashi; Takehiro Michikawa; Makiko Sekiyama; Yu Taniguchi; Shin Yamazaki
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.