Literature DB >> 29092757

Physician specialty and long-term survival after myocardial infarction - A study including all German statutory health insured patients.

Maria Radzimanowski1, Christian Gallowitz2, Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn3, Nina Rieckmann3, Bernhard Tenckhoff2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With a mortality rate above European average, myocardial infarction (MI) is the second most common cause of death in Germany. Data about post-MI ambulatory care and mortality is scarce. We examined the association between ambulatory treating physicians' specialty and the mortality of post-MI patients.
METHODS: Medical claims data of all 17 German regional Associations of Statutory Health Insurance physicians were analyzed, which cover approximately 90% of the German population. Patients with a new diagnosis of a MI in 2011 were divided into treatment groups with and without ambulant cardiology care within the first year after MI diagnosis. Propensity-score matching based on socio-demographic and clinical variables was performed to achieve comparability between groups. The 18-month mortality rate was derived employing a validated method.
RESULTS: 158,494 patients with a new diagnosis of MI had received post-MI ambulatory care in 2011. Half of them (51%) had at least one ambulatory contact with a cardiologist within the first year. During a follow-up of 18months, the mortality rate before and after propensity-score matching was 19% and 14% in patients without cardiology care and 6%, respectively, in patients with cardiology care (χ2=666.7; P<0.000 after propensity adjustment). Patients who only saw a cardiologist and had no additional contact to an ambulant general practitioner (GP)/internist within the first year did not have increased survival rates.
CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient follow-up care by a cardiologist in combination with consultations of GP/internists within the first year may be of importance for the prognosis of MI patients.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulatory care; Cardiologist; Medical claims data; Mortality; Myocardial infarction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29092757     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.10.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  4 in total

1.  Secondary prevention of coronary artery disease in Poland. Results from the POLASPIRE survey.

Authors:  Piotr Jankowski; Dariusz A Kosior; Paweł Sowa; Karolina Szóstak-Janiak; Paweł Kozieł; Agnieszka Krzykwa; Emilia Sawicka; Maciej Haberka; Małgorzata Setny; Karol Kamiński; Zbigniew Gąsior; Aldona Kubica; Dirk De Bacquer; Guy De Backer; Kornelia Kotseva; David Wood; Andrzej Pająk; Danuta Czarnecka
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 2.737

2.  Understanding the importance of social determinants and rurality for the long-term outcome after acute myocardial infarction: study protocol for a single-centre cohort study.

Authors:  Benjamin Sasko; Philipp Jaehn; Rhea Müller; Henrike Andresen; Stephan Müters; Christine Holmberg; Oliver Ritter; Nikolaos Pagonas
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Patients' adherence to optimal therapeutic, lifestyle and risk factors recommendations after myocardial infarction: Six years follow-up in primary care.

Authors:  Clarisse Dibao-Dina; Denis Angoulvant; Jean-Pierre Lebeau; Jean-Eudes Peurois; Karim Abdallah El Hirtsi; Anne-Marie Lehr-Drylewicz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  How Specialist Aftercare Impacts Long-Term Readmission Risks in Elderly Patients With Metabolic, Cardiac, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases: Cohort Study Using Administrative Data.

Authors:  Michaela Kaleta; Thomas Niederkrotenthaler; Alexandra Kautzky-Willer; Peter Klimek
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2020-09-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.