Literature DB >> 2909189

Records, recall loss, and recall bias in pregnancy: a comparison of interview and medical records data of pregnant and postnatal women.

H E Bryant1, N Visser, E J Love.   

Abstract

To determine the agreement between interview-based and medical records data concerning illnesses and medications early in pregnancy, we compared the interviews of 202 women with the ongoing records collected during their pregnancies. Substantial underrecording of most transient illnesses was found. Fewer short-term illnesses were reported by postpartum women than sill-pregnant women, suggesting the potential for recall bias or loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2909189      PMCID: PMC1349477          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.79.1.78

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  3 in total

1.  Childbirth research data: medical records or women's reports?

Authors:  D Hewson; A Bennett
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Prospective versus retrospective approach in the search for environmental causes of malformations.

Authors:  A Klemetti; L Saxén
Journal:  Am J Public Health Nations Health       Date:  1967-12

3.  A comparison of pregnancy history recall and medical records. Implications for retrospective studies.

Authors:  B C Tilley; A B Barnes; E Bergstralh; D Labarthe; K L Noller; T Colton; E Adam
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 4.897

  3 in total
  18 in total

1.  Prospective recruitment of women receiving prenatal care from diverse provider arrangements: a potential strategy.

Authors:  A Handler; D Rosenberg; T Johnson; K Raube; M A Kelley
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1997-09

2.  A comparison of maternal interview and medical record ascertainment of violence among women who had poor pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Lise E Fried; Ann Aschengrau; Howard Cabral; Hortensia Amaro
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2006-06-27

Review 3.  Patient self-reports in pharmacoeconomic studies. Their use and impact on study validity.

Authors:  C Evans; B Crawford
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Medication use during pregnancy in Omani women.

Authors:  Intisar M Al-Riyami; Intisar Q Al-Busaidy; Ibrahim S Al-Zakwani
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2011-05-20

5.  Pregnancy associated smoking behavior and six year postpartum recall.

Authors:  Sharon M Hensley Alford; Rachel E Lappin; L Peterson; Christine C Johnson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2008-09-26

6.  Medical record validation of maternal recall of pregnancy and birth events from a twin cohort.

Authors:  Jianghong Liu; Catherine Tuvblad; Linda Li; Adrian Raine; Laura A Baker
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 1.587

7.  Utilisation of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) practitioners within maternity care provision: results from a nationally representative cohort study of 1,835 pregnant women.

Authors:  Amie Steel; Jon Adams; David Sibbritt; Alex Broom; Cindy Gallois; Jane Frawley
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Concordance between Sources of Morbidity Reports: Self-Reports and Medical Records.

Authors:  Michael P Jones; Roger Bartrop; Hugh G Dickson; Lina Forcier
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  Agreement between questionnaire and medical records on some health and socioeconomic problems among poisoning cases.

Authors:  Ahmed I Fathelrahman
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2009-09-14

10.  Measuring coverage in MNCH: testing the validity of women's self-report of key maternal and newborn health interventions during the peripartum period in Mozambique.

Authors:  Cynthia K Stanton; Barbara Rawlins; Mary Drake; Matias Dos Anjos; David Cantor; Lidia Chongo; Leonardo Chavane; Maria da Luz Vaz; Jim Ricca
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.