Lindsay B Kilburn1, Mehmet Kocak2, Patricia Baxter3, Tina Young Poussaint4, Arnold C Paulino5, Christine McIntyre6, Annabelle Lemenuel-Diot7, Christine Lopez-Diaz8, Larry Kun9, Murali Chintagumpala3, Jack M Su3, Alberto Broniscer10,11, Justin N Baker10, Eugene I Hwang1, Maryam Fouladi12, James M Boyett13, Susan M Blaney3. 1. Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia. 2. Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee. 3. Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. 4. Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 6. Roche Innovation Center, Welwyn, United Kingdom. 7. Roche Innovation Center, Basel, Switzerland. 8. Hoffman-LaRoche, Nutley, New Jersey. 9. Department of Radiological Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Memphis, Tennessee. 10. Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee. 11. Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, Tennessee. 12. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio. 13. Department of Biostatistics, Operations and Biostatistics Center for PBTC, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We conducted a phase II study of oral capecitabine rapidly disintegrating tablets given concurrently with radiation therapy (RT) to assess progression-free survival (PFS) in children with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Children 3-17 years with newly diagnosed DIPG were eligible. Capecitabine, 650 mg/m2 /dose BID (maximum tolerated dose [MTD] in children with concurrent radiation), was administered for 9 weeks starting the first day of RT. Following a 2-week break, three courses of capecitabine, 1,250 mg/m2 /dose BID for 14 days followed by a 7-day rest, were administered. As prospectively designed, 10 evaluable patients treated at the MTD on the phase I trial were included in the phase II analyses. The design was based on comparison of the PFS distribution to a contemporary historical control (n = 140) with 90% power to detect a 15% absolute improvement in the 1-year PFS with a type-1 error rate, α = 0.10. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were evaluable for the phase II objectives. Capecitabine and RT was well tolerated with low-grade palmar plantar erythrodyesthesia, increased alanine aminotransferase, cytopenias, and vomiting the most commonly reported toxicities. Findings were significant for earlier progression with 1-year PFS of 7.21% (SE = 3.47%) in the capecitabine-treated cohort versus 15.59% (SE = 3.05%) in the historical control (P = 0.007), but there was no difference for overall survival (OS) distributions (P = 0.30). Tumor enhancement at diagnosis was associated with shorter PFS and OS. Capecitabine was rapidly absorbed and converted to its metabolites. CONCLUSION: Capecitabine did not improve the outcome for children with newly diagnosed DIPG.
BACKGROUND: We conducted a phase II study of oral capecitabine rapidly disintegrating tablets given concurrently with radiation therapy (RT) to assess progression-free survival (PFS) in children with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Children 3-17 years with newly diagnosed DIPG were eligible. Capecitabine, 650 mg/m2 /dose BID (maximum tolerated dose [MTD] in children with concurrent radiation), was administered for 9 weeks starting the first day of RT. Following a 2-week break, three courses of capecitabine, 1,250 mg/m2 /dose BID for 14 days followed by a 7-day rest, were administered. As prospectively designed, 10 evaluable patients treated at the MTD on the phase I trial were included in the phase II analyses. The design was based on comparison of the PFS distribution to a contemporary historical control (n = 140) with 90% power to detect a 15% absolute improvement in the 1-year PFS with a type-1 error rate, α = 0.10. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were evaluable for the phase II objectives. Capecitabine and RT was well tolerated with low-grade palmar plantar erythrodyesthesia, increased alanine aminotransferase, cytopenias, and vomiting the most commonly reported toxicities. Findings were significant for earlier progression with 1-year PFS of 7.21% (SE = 3.47%) in the capecitabine-treated cohort versus 15.59% (SE = 3.05%) in the historical control (P = 0.007), but there was no difference for overall survival (OS) distributions (P = 0.30). Tumor enhancement at diagnosis was associated with shorter PFS and OS. Capecitabine was rapidly absorbed and converted to its metabolites. CONCLUSION:Capecitabine did not improve the outcome for children with newly diagnosed DIPG.
Authors: Catherine S Grasso; Yujie Tang; Nathalene Truffaux; Noah E Berlow; Lining Liu; Marie-Anne Debily; Michael J Quist; Lara E Davis; Elaine C Huang; Pamelyn J Woo; Anitha Ponnuswami; Spenser Chen; Tessa B Johung; Wenchao Sun; Mari Kogiso; Yuchen Du; Lin Qi; Yulun Huang; Marianne Hütt-Cabezas; Katherine E Warren; Ludivine Le Dret; Paul S Meltzer; Hua Mao; Martha Quezado; Dannis G van Vuurden; Jinu Abraham; Maryam Fouladi; Matthew N Svalina; Nicholas Wang; Cynthia Hawkins; Javad Nazarian; Marta M Alonso; Eric H Raabe; Esther Hulleman; Paul T Spellman; Xiao-Nan Li; Charles Keller; Ranadip Pal; Jacques Grill; Michelle Monje Journal: Nat Med Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: David N Korones; Paul G Fisher; Cynthia Kretschmar; Tianni Zhou; Zhengjia Chen; James Kepner; Carolyn Freeman Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Kenneth J Cohen; Richard L Heideman; Tianni Zhou; Emiko J Holmes; Robert S Lavey; Eric Bouffet; Ian F Pollack Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2011-02-22 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Tina Young Poussaint; Mehmet Kocak; Sridhar Vajapeyam; Roger I Packer; Richard L Robertson; Russell Geyer; Daphne Haas-Kogan; Ian F Pollack; Gilbert Vezina; Robert Zimmerman; Soonmee Cha; Zoltan Patay; James M Boyett; Larry E Kun Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2011-02-04 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Kristin A Bradley; Tianni Zhou; Rene Y McNall-Knapp; Regina I Jakacki; Adam S Levy; Gilbert Vezina; Ian F Pollack Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-10-22 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Amar Gajjar; Roger J Packer; N K Foreman; Kenneth Cohen; Daphne Haas-Kogan; Thomas E Merchant Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2012-12-19 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Maryam Fouladi; H Stacy Nicholson; Tianni Zhou; Fred Laningham; Kathleen J Helton; Emi Holmes; Kenneth Cohen; Rose Anne Speights; John Wright; Ian F Pollack Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-12-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Matthew Gallitto; Stanislav Lazarev; Isaac Wasserman; James M Stafford; Suzanne L Wolden; Stephanie A Terezakis; Ranjit S Bindra; Richard L Bakst Journal: Adv Radiat Oncol Date: 2019-03-30
Authors: S Vajapeyam; D Brown; C Billups; Z Patay; G Vezina; M S Shiroishi; M Law; P Baxter; A Onar-Thomas; J R Fangusaro; I J Dunkel; T Y Poussaint Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-04-02 Impact factor: 4.966