Literature DB >> 29090507

Implications of failure to achieve a result from prenatal maternal serum cell-free DNA testing: a historical cohort study.

N Chan1, M-E Smet2, R Sandow2, F da Silva Costa3,4, A McLennan2,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pregnancy outcomes in a cohort of women who failed to obtain a result in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT).
DESIGN: Historical cohort study.
SETTING: A multicentre private practice in Sydney, Australia. POPULATION: Women who failed to obtain a result from NIPT (n = 131).
METHODS: The maternal characteristics, antenatal investigations and pregnancy outcomes for these women were compared with those who obtained a result at the same practice and to the general Australian obstetric population. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Antenatal investigations: pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A), free β-human chorionic gonadotrophin (β-hCG), placental growth factor (PlGF), uterine artery pulsatility index (PI), mean arterial pressure (MAP). Pregnancy outcomes: chromosomal abnormality, pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, small-for-gestational-age (SGA), preterm delivery.
RESULTS: Only 1.1% of NIPT samples failed to return a result. This cohort was significantly older and had significantly increased weight compared with the general Australian obstetric population. Pregnancy outcomes were available for 94% of the cohort. There were significantly higher rates of chromosomal aneuploidies (6.5% versus 0.2%, P < 0.0001), pre-eclampsia (11% versus 1.5%, P < 0.0001) and gestational diabetes (23% versus 7.5%, P < 0.0001) compared with the general obstetric population. Rates of preterm delivery and SGA were elevated but did not reach significance. Antenatal investigations demonstrated decreased PAPP-A MoM (0.75 versus 1.14, P < 0.0001), decreased free β-hCG (0.71 versus 1.01, P < 0.0001) and increased uterine artery PI (1.79 versus 1.65, P = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Women who fail to obtain a result from NIPT are at increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, in particular chromosomal aneuploidy, gestational diabetes and pre-eclampsia. FUNDING: None received. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Women who fail to obtain a result from cell-free DNA NIPT are at increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
© 2017 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse pregnancy outcome; cell-free DNA; fetal fraction; non-invasive prenatal testing failure; prenatal

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29090507     DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  8 in total

1.  Clinical and biological determinants of circulating tumor DNA detection and prognostication using a next-generation sequencing panel assay.

Authors:  David Hsiehchen; Magdalena Espinoza; David E Gerber; Muhammad S Beg
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 4.875

2.  Low Fetal Fraction of Cell Free DNA at Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening Increases the Subsequent Risk of Preterm Birth in Uncomplicated Singleton Pregnancy.

Authors:  Xiaosong Yuan; Xiaoya Han; Chenbo Jia; Wenbo Zhou; Bin Yu
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2022-07-13

3.  Low fetal fraction in cell-free DNA testing is associated with adverse pregnancy outcome: Analysis of a subcohort of the TRIDENT-2 study.

Authors:  Ellis C Becking; Soetinah A M Wirjosoekarto; Peter G Scheffer; Julia V M Huiskes; Marinka J Remmelink; Erik A Sistermans; Caroline J Bax; Janneke M Weiss; Lidewij Henneman; Mireille N Bekker
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 3.242

4.  Autoimmune disorders but not heparin are associated with cell-free fetal DNA test failure.

Authors:  Yohann Dabi; Sarah Guterman; Jacques C Jani; Alexandra Letourneau; Adèle Demain; Pascale Kleinfinger; Laurence Lohmann; Jean-Marc Costa; Alexandra Benachi
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 5.  Factors Affecting the Fetal Fraction in Noninvasive Prenatal Screening: A Review.

Authors:  Cechuan Deng; Shanling Liu
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.418

6.  Association between low fetal fraction in cell-free DNA testing and adverse pregnancy outcome: A systematic review.

Authors:  Peter G Scheffer; Soetinah A M Wirjosoekarto; Ellis C Becking; Marjan M Weiss; Caroline J Bax; Dick Oepkes; Erik A Sistermans; Lidewij Henneman; Mireille N Bekker
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.242

Review 7.  Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing beyond Trisomies.

Authors:  Ioan Dumitru Suciu; Oana Daniela Toader; Slavyana Galeva; Lucian Pop
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

8.  Prenatal screening in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing: a Nationwide cross-sectional survey of obstetrician knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice.

Authors:  Liying Yang; Wei Ching Tan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.007

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.