Literature DB >> 2909041

The clinical significance of pain and cognitive activity in latent labor.

M Wuitchik1, D Bakal, J Lipshitz.   

Abstract

We examined the relationship between pain and cognitive activity during the latent (less than or equal to 3 cm), mid-active (5-7 cm), and transition (greater than or equal to 8 cm) phases of labor and the concomitant efficiency of the latent, active, and descent phases in 115 nulliparous women. Patients provided subjective pain ratings and described their thoughts during each of the three phases. Higher levels of pain during the latent phase of labor were predictive of longer latent (r = 0.58) and active (r = 0.50) phases of labor. Distress-related thoughts during latent labor were predictive of longer latent (r = 0.31, P less than .01), active (r = 0.67), and second-stage (r = 0.61) labor. We found no relationships between pain and cognitive activity measured during active labor and efficiency of active labor or second stage of labor. Pain and cognitive activity assessed during the latent phase were also prognostic of obstetric outcome. Thirteen of 19 women (68.4%) who reported "horrible" or "excruciating" pain required instrumental delivery, compared with eight of 27 women (29.6%) in the "discomforting" pain group. Subjects in the "distress-related" cognitive group had 2.6 times the incidence of instrumental delivery, five times the incidence of abnormal fetal heart rate patterns, and four times the requirement for pediatric assistance for the neonate than subjects in the "coping" group. We conclude that latent labor is a critical phase in the psychobiology of labor and that pain and cognitive activity during this phase are important contributors to labor efficiency and obstetric outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2909041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  10 in total

1.  A prospective observational study of ethnic and racial differences in neuraxial labor analgesia request and pain relief.

Authors:  Sylvia H Wilson; Matthew P Elliott; Bethany J Wolf; Latha Hebbar
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 2.  Assessment and support during early labour for improving birth outcomes.

Authors:  Shinobu Kobayashi; Nobutsugu Hanada; Masayo Matsuzaki; Kenji Takehara; Erika Ota; Hatoko Sasaki; Chie Nagata; Rintaro Mori
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-20

3.  Medical problems of adults who were sexually abused in childhood.

Authors:  R P Arnold; D Rogers; D A Cook
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-03-17

4.  Pain, suffering, and trauma in labor and prevention of subsequent posttraumatic stress disorder.

Authors:  Penny Simkin
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2011

5.  Obstetrical outcomes of labor with and without analgesia in Robson classification groups 1 and 2a: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Taro Yagi; Yasuto Kinose; Michiko Bun; Megumi Horai; Chie Matsuda; Tatsuya Miyake; Kazuya Mimura; Chiyo Otaki; Masayuki Endo; Tadashi Kimura
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Differential effects of epidural analgesia on modes of delivery and perinatal outcomes between nulliparous and multiparous women: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tai-Ho Hung; T'sang-T'ang Hsieh; Hung-Pin Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The degree of labor pain at the time of epidural analgesia in nulliparous women influences the obstetric outcome.

Authors:  Jae Hee Woo; Jong Hak Kim; Guie Yong Lee; Hee Jung Baik; Youn Jin Kim; Rack Kyung Chung; Du Gyun Yun; Chae Hwang Lim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-05-28

8.  Being in a safe and thus secure place, the core of early labour: A secondary analysis in a Swedish context.

Authors:  Ing-Marie Carlsson
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2016-05-10

9.  Effect on birth outcomes of a formalised approach to care in hospital labour assessment units: international, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Ellen D Hodnett; Robyn Stremler; Andrew R Willan; Julie A Weston; Nancy K Lowe; Kathleen R Simpson; William D Fraser; Amiram Gafni
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-08-28

10.  Women's perception of pre-hospital labour duration and obstetrical outcomes; a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Patricia A Janssen; Sandra Weissinger
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.007

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.