| Literature DB >> 29089860 |
Huiru Tang1,2, Yan Wang3, Bing Zhang4, Shiqiu Xiong5, Liangshuai Liu6, Wei Chen6, Guosheng Tan6,7, Heping Li6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether brain abundant membrane attached signal protein 1 (BASP1) is a valuable prognostic biomarker for cervical cancer and whether BASP1 regulates the progression of cervical cancer.Entities:
Keywords: BASP1; Cervical cancer; Prognosis; Tumor growth
Year: 2017 PMID: 29089860 PMCID: PMC5655910 DOI: 10.1186/s12935-017-0452-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Cell Int ISSN: 1475-2867 Impact factor: 5.722
Fig. 1BASP1 was upregulated in cervical cancer tissues. a BASP1 expression was upregulated in cervical cancer tissues compared with normal cervical epithelium tissues; p < 0.05. b Western blot showing BASP1 levels in cervical cancer tissues and adjacent normal cervical epithelium tissues. c Immunohistochemistry assay showing BASP1 levels in cervical cancer tissues and normal cervical epithelium tissues. BASP1 staining of normal cervical epithelium tissue (left), BASP1 staining of cervical cancer tissue (right) (×100 and ×200, respectively)
Fig. 2Patients with higher BASP1 expression had shorter overall survival time. a Immunohistochemistry assay showing BASP1 levels in tissues of patients who have died in the follow-up time and the tissues of patients who survived during the follow-up time. BASP1 staining of cervical cancer tissue from survival patients (left), BASP1 staining of cervical cancer tissue from died patients (right) (×100 and ×200, respectively). Statistical analysis of the number of patients with high BASP1 expression and low BASP1 expression in patients who have died and patients who survived, respectively; p = 0.0017. b Kaplan–Meier survival curve and log-rank test for patients with cervical cancer classified as showing either high or low BASP1 expression; p = 0.001
Correlation between BASP1 expression and clinicopathological characteristics of cervical carcinoma
| Characteristics | BASP1 | Chi square test | Fisher’s exact test | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low no. cases | High no. cases | |||
| Age (years) | ||||
| > 45 | 40 | 26 | 0.809 | 0.862 |
| ≤ 45 | 41 | 29 | ||
| Clinical stage | ||||
| Ib1 | 51 | 17 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Ib2 | 18 | 11 | ||
| IIa | 9 | 14 | ||
| IIb | 3 | 8 | ||
| III | 0 | 5 | ||
| T classification | ||||
| T1a1 | 14 | 2 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| T1a2 | 2 | 0 | ||
| T1b1 | 36 | 16 | ||
| T1b2 | 17 | 9 | ||
| T2a1 | 8 | 3 | ||
| T2a2 | 1 | 8 | ||
| T2b | 3 | 14 | ||
| T3a | 0 | 3 | ||
| N classification | ||||
| N0 | 62 | 32 | 0.023 | 0.037 |
| N1 | 19 | 23 | ||
| M classification | ||||
| No | 81 | 55 | – | – |
| Yes | 0 | 0 | ||
| Pathologic differentiation | ||||
| Well | 29 | 19 | 0.429 | 0.437 |
| Moderate | 26 | 13 | ||
| Poor | 26 | 23 | ||
| Survive or mortality | ||||
| Survive | 68 | 33 | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Mortality | 13 | 22 | ||
Univariate and multivariate analyses of various prognostic parameters in patients with cervical carcinoma using Cox-regression analysis
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. patients |
| Regression coefficient (SE) |
| Relative risk | 95% confidence interval | |
| Clinical stage | ||||||
| Ib1 | 68 | 0.000 | 0.503 (0.127) | 0.000 | 1.687 | 1.318–2.160 |
| Ib2 | 29 | |||||
| IIa | 23 | |||||
| IIb | 11 | |||||
| III | 5 | |||||
| Pathologic differentiation | ||||||
| Well | 48 | 0.039 | 0.431 (0.209) | 0.019 | 1.659 | 1.088–2.528 |
| Moderate | 39 | |||||
| Poor | 49 | |||||
| Expression of BASP1 | ||||||
| Low expression | 81 | 0.002 | 1.084 (0.351) | 0.037 | 2.220 | 1.051–4.692 |
| High expression | 55 | |||||
Fig. 3BASP1 was upregulated in cervical cancer cells, and overexpression of BASP1 prompted the proliferation of cervical cancer. a Western blot showing BASP1 levels in immortalized ectocervical and endocervical epithelium and cervical cancer cells. b Western blot assay confirming the presence of BASP1 in indicated transduced cells. c MTT assay showing the effect of BASP1 overexpression on cell proliferation. d Colony formation assay showing the effect of BASP1 overexpressed on cell proliferation; representative micrographs (left) and quantification (right) of crystal violet stained cell colonies. e Cell cycle analysis showing the effect of BASP1 overexpression on cell proliferation. *p < 0.05, error bars represent the mean ± SD
Fig. 4BASP1 promoted tumorigenicity of cervical cancer and tumor growth in vivo. a Anchorage-independent growth assay showing the effect of BASP1 overexpression or knockdown on the tumorigenicity of indicated cervical cells, Representative micrographs (left) and quantification of colonies that were > 0.1 mm (right). b The effect of BASP1 on cell growth used xenograft model in nude mice, ME-180 cells with BASP1 overexpression or knockdown were injected to the subcutaneous sites of nude mice. Representative images of the tumors in nude mice. c The effect of BASP1 on cell growth in a xenograft model in nude mice; tumor volumes were measured on the indicated days. d Western blot showing Ki67 levels in tumors growth from indicated transduced cells in nude mice. *p < 0.05, error bars represent the mean ± SD