| Literature DB >> 29089831 |
Ji Eun Park1, Bumwoo Park1,2, Sang Joon Kim1, Ho Sung Kim1, Choong Gon Choi1, Seung Chai Jung1, Joo Young Oh1, Jae-Hong Lee3, Jee Hoon Roh3, Woo Hyun Shim1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify potential imaging biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease by combining brain cortical thickness (CThk) and functional connectivity and to validate this model's diagnostic accuracy in a validation set.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; Biomarker; Brain; Magnetic resonance imaging; Resting-state functional MRI
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29089831 PMCID: PMC5639164 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.6.983
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Radiol ISSN: 1229-6929 Impact factor: 3.500
Fig. 1Group-difference map of default mode network between AD and HC.
Axial images revealing default mode network identified as network with differences between patients with AD and HCs, using independent component analysis. Numbers beneath each image refer to z coordinates in Talairach space. T score bars are shown on right. AD = Alzheimer's disease, HC = healthy control
Fig. 2Schematic diagram for identifying regions with group-differences between AD and HC.
For each subject, correlation coefficient (r) between mPFC and PCC FC was extracted. Group analysis was performed to identify locations with significant differences between patients with AD and HC in terms of correlation of 1) r value of mPFC-PCC FC and 2) CThk. Diagnostic performance of combining mPFC-PCC FC and CThk of identified locations was then tested in validation set using support vector machine. ADNI = Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, CThk = cortical thickness, DMN = default mode network, FC = functional connectivity, mPFC = medial prefrontal cortex, PCC = posterior cingulate cortex
Clinical Characteristics of Study Population
| Variables | Study Set | ADNI Set | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AD | HC | AD | HC | |||
| n | 41 | 22 | 16 | 19 | ||
| Age (years) | 71.2 ± 7.5 | 67.9 ± 4.5 | 0.068 | 73.6 ± 4.1 | 72.5 ± 7.9 | 0.517 |
| Males, n (%) | 13 (30.9) | 9 (40.9) | 0.255† | 9 (45.0) | 11 (55.0) | 0.556† |
| Right-handedness (%) | 41 (100.0) | 22 (100.0) | 16 (100.0) | 19 (100.0) | ||
| MMSE score | 17.2 ± 5.4 | 29.3 ± 1.6 | < 0.001 | 19.4 ± 5.5 | 29.5 ± 0.8 | < 0.001 |
| Years of education | 7.0 ± 5.5 | 13.2 ± 3.4 | < 0.001 | NA | ||
| Clinical Dementia Rating Scale | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 0 | < 0.001 | 1.1 ± 0.5 | 0.12 ± 0.6 | < 0.001 |
Unless otherwise indicated, data are expressed as mean ± standard deviations. *Unless otherwise indicated, p value was obtained with two-sample t test (two-tailed and unequal variance), †p value was obtained with two-tailed χ2 test. AD = Alzheimer's disease, HC = healthy controls, MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination
Differences of Correlation Coefficients for Default Mode Network in Study Set
| Correlation Coefficient of Functional Connection | Alzheimer’s Disease | Healthy Controls | |
|---|---|---|---|
| mPFC–PCC | 0.569 ± 0.202 | 0.718 ± 0.123 | 0.002 |
| PCC–right IPL FC | 0.514 ± 0.169 | 0.592 ± 0.110 | 0.062 |
| PCC–left IPL FC | 0.546 ± 0.155 | 0.600 ± 0.102 | 0.181 |
Correlation values were calculated using Pearson's correlation test. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. FC = functional connectivity, IPL = inferior parietal lobule, mPFC = medial prefrontal cortex, PCC = posterior cingulate cortex
Fig. 3Regions with significant differences between AD and HC groups.
Inflated atlas brain image shows regions of left hemisphere with significant differences in cortical thickness between patients with AD and HCs, after accounting for mPFC-PCC FC and brain cortical thickness.
Fig. 4Support vector machine model in study set.
Plots represent support vectors for discriminating between patients with AD and HCs in study set. Subjects and hyperplane (gray plane) are projected in three dimensions. Resulting hyperplane is optimal tradeoff between high model generalization and discrimination accuracy. SMG = supramarginal gyrus, STG = superior temporal gyrus
Diagnostic Accuracy of FC Correlated with Cortical Thickness of Identified Regions (STG and SMG in Left Cerebral Hemisphere) Compared with That of Medial Temporal Lobes in Validation Set
| Variables | Accuracy (%) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medial temporal lobes | 75.0 | 75.0 | 78.9 | 75.0 | 78.9 |
| Medial temporal lobes + | 77.1 | 81.3 | 74.7 | 72.2 | 82.4 |
| Our combination | 91.7 | 68.7 | 94.7 | 91.7 | 78.2 |
Numbers in parenthesis are 95% confidence interval. NPV = negative predictive value, PPV = positive predictive value, SMG = supramarginal gyrus, STG = superior temporal gyrus