| Literature DB >> 29089666 |
Aneta Cymbaluk-Płoska1, Anita Chudecka-Głaz1, Ewa Pius-Sadowska2, Agnieszka Sompolska-Rzechuła3, Karolina Chudecka1, Michał Bulsa1, Bogusław Machaliński2, Janusz Menkiszak1.
Abstract
The objectives of the study were to assess the relationship between the serum levels of MMP-9 and NGAL and the clinical staging and histopathological grade of the tumor. Lipocalin-2/NGAL and MMP-9 concentrations were quantified in serum by multiplex fluorescent bead-based immunoassays (Luminex Corporation, Austin, TX, USA). The AUC values for NGAL and MMP-9 were 0.9 and 0.78, respectively. The diagnostic potential of NGAL and MMP-9 in differentiating high-stage (FIGO III and IV) and low-stage (FIGO I and II) cancer and predicting the cell differentiation grade (G1 versus G3) on the basis of the analyses of AUC values was determined to be 0.91 and 0.79 for NGAL and 0.82 and 0.84 for MMP-9, respectively. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis in the final method revealed that NGAL and MMP-9 variables were independent of the endometrial cancer risk. OR values for NGAL and MMP-9 were 1.23 (95% CI 1.421-3.27; p = 0.034) and 1.09 (95% CI: 1.38-4.12; p = 0.026), respectively. The NGAL/MMP-9 complex may be useful in the assessment of tumor stage before surgical treatment.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29089666 PMCID: PMC5635290 DOI: 10.1155/2017/6589262
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Markers ISSN: 0278-0240 Impact factor: 3.434
Patients with endometrial cancer divided into subgroups.
| Subgroups | Distribution | Numbers |
|---|---|---|
| The histopathological type | Type I cancer (endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma) |
|
| Type II cancer patients (serous endometrial carcinoma, squamous adenocarcinoma, and clear cell carcinoma) |
| |
| Histopathological grade of the tumor | G1 |
|
| G2 |
| |
| G3 |
| |
| Clinical stage of the tumor | FIGO I and II |
|
| FIGO III and IV |
| |
| Myometrial infiltration depth | Superficial myometrial infiltration (<1/2 of the thickness) |
|
| Deep myometrial infiltration (>1/2 of the thickness) |
| |
| Vascular space involvement | With vascular invasion |
|
| Without vascular invasion |
| |
| Lymph vessel involvement | With lymph vessel invasion |
|
| Without lymph vessel invasion |
| |
| Lymph node metastases | With lymph node metastases |
|
| Without lymph node metastases |
|
Comparative analysis of the study groups.
| Variable |
| Mean range | Median (95.000%–95.000%) |
| Mean range | Median (95.000%–95.000%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carcinoma endometrium | Normal endometrium | ||||||
| MMP-9 | 80 | 8089.6 (6481.1–8891.7) | 8234.2 (6341.6–8732.1) | 23 | 5698.2 (3987.1–6341.1) | 5712.1 (4251.4–6652.3) | 0.001 |
| NGAL | 80 | 180 (120–240) | 171 (130–231) | 23 | 110 (90–134) | 113 (106–127) | 0.002 |
| Carcinoma endometrium | Polyp endometrium | ||||||
| MMP-9 | 80 | 8089.6 (6481.1–8891.7) | 8234.2 (6341.6–8732.1) | 20 | 6213.3 (4235.1–7123.8) | 6438.1 (4521.2–7234.8) | 0.003 |
| NGAL | 80 | 180 (120–240) | 171 (130–231) | 20 | 118 (107–150) | 110 (99–142) | 0.004 |
| Carcinoma endometrium | Myoma | ||||||
| MMP-9 | 80 | 8089.6 (6481.1–8891.7) | 8234.2 (6341.6–8732.1) | 20 | 4923.1 (3615.2–6213.4) | 5022.1 (3871.4–6431.1) | 0.0002 |
| NGAL | 80 | 180 (120–240) | 171 (130–231) | 20 | 132 (113–170) | 128 (120–161) | 0.005 |
Figure 1Correlation between mean concentrations of NGAL and BMI in the whole study patient group.
NGAL and MMP-9 concentration levels in patients with or without endometrial cancer risk factors.
| NGAL | MMP-9 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Obesity | 230 (170–254) | 7234.5 (6345–8234) | Mean range |
| Without obesity | 150 (110–188) | 7465.6 (6234–8767) | |
|
| 0.001 | >0.05 | |
| Diabetes t2 | 210 (148–243) | 7632.3 (7142–8111) | Mean range |
| Without diabetes t2 | 132 (103–163) | 7231.4 (6721–8082) | |
|
| 0.002 | >0.05 | |
| Hypertension | 189 (138–201) | 6721.1 (6234.6–7341.3) | Mean range |
| Without hypertension | 160 (131–192) | 7561.4 (7098–8212) | |
|
| >0.05 | >0.05 |
Comparative analysis according to the prognostic factors for NGAL.
| Mean | Median | Min | Max |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endometroid/non-endometroid | 176/193 | 175/191 | 132/139 | 190/240 | 0.054 |
| G1/G2 | 142/161 | 144/168 | 120/126 | 172/180 | 0.081 |
| G1/G3 | 142/191 | 144/201 | 121/168 | 172/240 | 0.003 |
| FIGO I and II/FIGO III and IV | 140/220 | 142/226 | 123/178 | 179/280 | 0.001 |
| Vascular invasion (±) | 152/203 | 149/201 | 120/170 | 179/258 | 0.002 |
| Lymph vessel invasion (±) | 156/213 | 160/221 | 136/177 | 180/262 | 0.003 |
| Lymph node metastasis (±) | 155/231 | 157/230 | 131/180 | 179/281 | 0.001 |
| Infiltrate the myometrium superficial/deep | 158/185 | 156/186 | 140/149 | 182/232 | 0.066 |
Comparative analysis according to the prognostic factors for MMP-9.
| Mean | Median | Min | Max |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endometroid/non-endometroid | 7721.5/8909.8 | 7543.6/8823.3 | 7012.6/8002.3 | 8231/9567.6 | 0.04 |
| G1/G2 | 5263/6789.2 | 5324.2/6881.2 | 4967.2/5122.5 | 5778.1/7657.7 | 0.061 |
| G1/G3 | 5263/8782.1 | 5324.2/889.2 | 4967.2/6744.5 | 5778.1/989.0 | 0.02 |
| FIGO I and II/FIGO III and IV | 5433.1/9213.7 | 5367/9311.7 | 4977.2/7338.4 | 6877.2/10131.8 | 0.001 |
| Vascular invasion (±) | 5688.3/8672.9 | 5723.3/8721.5 | 5002.9/7112.4 | 5989.7/9881.7 | 0.004 |
| Lymph vessels invasion (±) | 6345.2/7187.2 | 6463.1/7132.2 | 4412.5/5323.9 | 7889.2/8999.3 | 0.07 |
| Lymph nodes metastasis (±) | 5998.1/9141.8 | 6021/9099.3 | 5121.9/7111 | 6781.9/10267 | 0.003 |
| Infiltrate the myometrium superficial/deep | 6891.3/9234.8 | 6631.4/9122.4 | 5899.6/7114.8 | 7346.8/10145.6 | 0.01 |
Figure 2The ROC curves for indicator NGAL/MMP-9 in women. The analysis compared endometrial cancer patients to patients with benign endometrial lesions.
Figure 3The ROC curves for MMP-9 proteins in women. The analysis compared endometrial cancer patients to patients with benign endometrial lesions.
Figure 4The ROC curves for NGAL proteins in women. The analysis compared endometrial cancer patients to patients with benign endometrial lesions.
Figure 5The ROC curves for MMP-9 and NGAL proteins depending on staging.
Figure 6The ROC curves for MMP-9 and NGAL proteins in G1 and G3 grading.
Figure 7The ROC curves for indicator NGAL/MMP-9 depending on staging.
Figure 8The ROC curves for indicator NGAL/MMP-9 depending on grading.
Multifactorial logistic regression models for NGAL and MMP-9 for staging, grading, and lymph node metastasis.
| Protein | OR | 95% CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Lymph node metastasis | |||
| NGAL | 1.4 | 0.9–2.98 | 0.02 |
| MMP-9 | 2.02 | 3.1–6.42 | 0.004 |
| FIGO III and IV versus I and II | |||
| NGAL | 3.66 | 4.2–12.3 | 0.005 |
| MMP-9 | 1.28 | 1.58–7.2 | 0.03 |
| GRADING III versus I | |||
| NGAL | 1.09 | 1.8–5.2 | 0.03 |
| MMP-9 | 1.83 | 2.4–8.9 | 0.02 |