| Literature DB >> 29089475 |
Tarek K Motawi1, Samia A Ahmed2, Manal A Hamed2, Shohda A El-Maraghy1, Wessam M Aziz2.
Abstract
The study aimed to explore the prophylactic effect of melatonin, rowatinex; a naturally occurring renal drug, and its combination on diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetic rats. Diabetes was induced by intraperitoneal injection of a single dose of streptozotocin (50 mg/g body weight). Three days before diabetes induction, rats were daily treated with melatonin, rowatinex and their combination continuously for 8 weeks. Evaluation was done through measuring blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum uric acid, serum creatinine, urine creatinine, creatinine clearance, nitric oxide (NO), malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione (GSH), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), heat shock protein-70 (HSP-70), caspase-3, transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ1), DNA degradation by the comet assay and total protein contents. Histopathologic study was also done for the kidney and the pancreas. Drastic changes in all measured parameters of the diabetic rats were observed. Treatment with melatonin and rowatinex showed amelioration to variable degrees. In conclusion, melatonin showed the most potent effect on protecting rats from deleterious action of diabetic nephropathy followed by its combination with rowatinex.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 29089475 PMCID: PMC6477174 DOI: 10.7555/JBR.31.20160028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Res ISSN: 1674-8301
Protective effect of different drugs on kidney function parameters in rats with diabetic nephropathy
| Groups | BUN (mg/dL) | Serum uric acid (mg/dL) | Serum creatinine (mg/dL) | Urine creatinine (mg/dL) | Creatinine clearance (mL/minute) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 26.48f±2.07 | 1.31f±0.07 | 0.42g±0.04 | 42.52ab±8.91 | 1.26a±0.23 |
| Control
| 35.32b±2.02 | 1.68e±0.13 | 0.53d±0.05 | 42.94ab±7.76 | 0.992c±0.07 |
| Control
| 29.24cde±1.34 | 1.75 de±0.109 | 0.44fg±0.06 | 41.28ab±11.43 | 0.89c±0.11 |
| Control (Rowatinex+ Melatonin) | 26.73f±1.48 | 1.64e±0.18 | 0.54d±0.06 | 40.84b±10.24 | 1.11ab±0.13 |
| Diabetic | 61.86a±2.02 | 3.89a±0.26 | 2.67 a±0.18 | 13.86d±8.98 | 0.14d±0.04 |
| Prophylactic (Rowatinex) | 31.10c±2.22 | 2.04 c±0.104 | 0.60c±0.06 | 34.20c±5.49 | 0.86c±0.09 |
| Prophylactic (Melatonin) | 26.68f±0.81 | 2.21b±0.09 | 0.48ef±0.05 | 46.38 a±10.63 | 0.87c±0.10 |
| Prophylactic (Rowatinex+ Melatonin) | 36.66b±2.48 | 2.32 b±0.14 | 0.53d±0.05 | 41.6ab±7.84 | 1.17a±0.82 |
• Data are mean±SD of ten rats in each group.
• Statistical analysis are done using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Co Stat Computer program accompanied with least significance level (LSD) between groups at P <0.05.
• Unshared superscript letters are significant values between groups at P<0.0001.
Protective effect of different drugs on oxidative stress markers in rats with diabetic nephropathy
| Groups | NO (µmol/g tissue) | MDA (µg/mg protein) | SOD (µg/mg protein) | GSH (µg/mg protein) | TAC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 39.18f±3.95 | 70.68g±2.89 | 0.82a±0.07 | 2.21a±0.12 | 2.26a±0.176 |
| Control
| 41.46ef±4.61 | 70.20g±5.04 | 0.77b±0.08 | 2.10b±0.22 | 2.05b±0.058 |
| Control
| 43.30e±6.8 | 73.20g±5.22 | 0.68c±0.06 | 1.77f±0.06 | 2.02bc±0.09 |
| Control (Rowatinex+ Melatonin) | 51.27d±13.09 | 74.54g±6.38 | 0.696c±0.06 | 2.01a±0.13 | 2.052b±0.13 |
| Diabetic | 88.92a±6.59 | 109.65a±7.50 | 0.53d±0.06 | 1.52h±0.057 | 1.21g±0.06 |
| Prophylactic
| 57.94c±5.94 | 78.98f±6.76 | 0.67c±0.07 | 1.92de±0.09 | 1.94de±0.06 |
| Prophylactic
| 56.06c±4.98 | 84.48e±9.41 | 0.71c±0.08 | 1.84ef±0.11 | 2.046b±0.13 |
| Prophylactic (Rowatinex+ Melatonin) | 57.86c±4.12 | 85.90de±6.69 | 0.73bc±0.12 | 2.02bcd±0.22 | 1.79f±0.08 |
• Data are mean±SD of ten rats in each group.
• Statistical analysis are done using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Co Stat Computer program accompanied with least significance level (LSD) between groups at P<0.05.
• Unshared superscript letters are significant values between groups at P<0.0001.
Protective effect of different drugs on kidney injury indices in rats with diabetic nephropathy
| Groups | KIM-1 (pg/mL) | HSP-70
| Caspase-3 (pg/mL) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 83.39h±22.5 | 1.80i±0.35 | 47.31g±11.60 | 115.24h±23.58 |
| Control | 97.36h±19.69 | 2.01h±0.23 | 38.60gh±3.99 | 125.16h±23.06 |
| Control | 97.22h±21.03 | 1.68i±0.21 | 33.32h±3.45 | 88.91I±5.26 |
| Control (Rowatinex+ Melatonin) | 101.9h±26.84 | 2.29g±0.24 | 48.84g±3.31 | 114.24h±26.26 |
| Diabetic | 1047.5a±96.72 | 6.89a±0.46 | 362.76a±30.48 | 579.82a±5.09 |
| Prophylactic | 703.39d±26.08 | 4.84d±0.25 | 292.55b±4.41 | 471.00c±12.37 |
| Prophylactic | 778.52c±17.54 | 4.76d±0.31 | 239.79e±17.46 | 426.38e±32.86 |
| Prophylactic (Rowatinex+ Melatonin) | 719.45d±10.39 | 4.844d±0.12 | 259.04d±5.05 | 438.72e±14.67 |
• Data are mean±SD of ten rats in each group.
• Statistical analysis are done using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Co Stat Computer program accompanied with least significance level (LSD) between groups at P<0.05.
• Unshared superscript letters are significant values between groups at P<0.0001.
Protective effect of different drugs on DNA degradation and protein contents in rats with diabetic nephropathy
| Groups | DNA tail length (µm) | % of tailed DNA | Tail moment (Unit) | Tissue total protein (mg/g) | Serum total protein (g/dL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 1.502i±0.49 | 1.492j±0.33 | 2.35I±1.22 | 8.14abc±0.81 | 6.05cd±0.44 |
| Control | 1.89g±0.08 | 2.14h±0.022 | 4.014h±0.18 | 6.76d±0.84 | 6.18cd±1.052 |
| Control | 1.682h±0.25 | 1.73i±0.22 | 3.016I±0.84 | 7.81bc±0.58 | 5.46d±0.38 |
| Control (Rowatinex+ Melatonin) | 2.23f±0.36 | 2.45g±0.30 | 5.31g±1.51 | 8abc±0.58 | 6.83bc±0.28 |
| Diabetic | 5.30a±0.21 | 5.14a±0.31 | 27.47a±2.74 | 5.10e±0.48 | 10.37a±3.20 |
| Prophylactic
| 3.816b±0.17 | 3.86cd±0.067 | 14.80c±0.59 | 8.52a±0.64 | 4.09e±1.23 |
| Prophylactic
| 3.97b±0.18 | 4.14b±0.036 | 16.33b±0.86 | 8.40ab±0.43 | 6.22cd±0.96 |
| Prophylactic (Rowatinex+ Melatonin) | 3.59c±0.13 | 3.73d±0.48 | 12.92d±0.577 | 7.74c±0.70 | 6.05cd±0.44 |
• Data are mean±SD of ten rats in each group.
• Statistical analysis are done using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Co Stat Computer program accompanied with least significance level (LSD) between groups at P<0.05.
• Unshared superscript letters are significant values between groups at P<0.0001.