Literature DB >> 29088919

Physician Perceptions of Performance Feedback in a Quality Improvement Activity.

Aimee R Eden1, Elizabeth Hansen1, Michael D Hagen1,2, Lars E Peterson1,2.   

Abstract

Physician performance and peer comparison feedback can affect physician care quality and patient outcomes. This study aimed to understand family physician perspectives of the value of performance feedback in quality improvement (QI) activities. This study analyzed American Board of Family Medicine open-ended survey data collected between 2004 and 2014 from physicians who completed a QI module that provided pre- and post-QI project individual performance data and peer comparisons. Physicians made 3480 comments in response to a question about this performance feedback, which were generally positive in nature (86%). Main themes that emerged were importance of accurate feedback data, enhanced detail in the content of feedback, and ability to customize peer comparison groups to compare performance to peers with similar patient populations or practice characteristics. Meaningful and tailored performance feedback may be an important tool for physicians to improve their care quality and should be considered an integral part of QI project design.

Entities:  

Keywords:  maintenance of certification; peer comparison feedback; performance feedback; performance improvement; physician payment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29088919     DOI: 10.1177/1062860617738327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Qual        ISSN: 1062-8606            Impact factor:   1.852


  6 in total

1.  Privacy-preserving architecture for providing feedback to clinicians on their clinical performance.

Authors:  Kassaye Yitbarek Yigzaw; Andrius Budrionis; Luis Marco-Ruiz; Torje Dahle Henriksen; Peder A Halvorsen; Johan Gustav Bellika
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 2.  The application of the tracer method with peer observation and formative feedback for professional development in clinical practice: a scoping review.

Authors:  Rudi A Steenbruggen; Marjo J M Maas; Thomas J Hoogeboom; Paul L P Brand; Philip J van der Wees
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2021-11-11

3.  Benefits of Providing Feedback and Utilisation Metrics to Specialists on Their Participation in eConsult.

Authors:  Erin Keely; Rhea Mitchell; Sheena Guglani; Douglas Archibald; Amir Afkham; Clare Liddy
Journal:  J Eur CME       Date:  2022-09-02

4.  An exploration into physician and surgeon data sensemaking: a qualitative systematic review using thematic synthesis.

Authors:  Emma Whitelock-Wainwright; Jia Wei Koh; Alexander Whitelock-Wainwright; Stella Talic; David Rankin; Dragan Gašević
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.298

5.  Designing clinical practice feedback reports: three steps illustrated in Veterans Health Affairs long-term care facilities and programs.

Authors:  Zach Landis-Lewis; Jennifer Kononowech; Winifred J Scott; Robert V Hogikyan; Joan G Carpenter; V S Periyakoil; Susan C Miller; Cari Levy; Mary Ersek; Anne Sales
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  Role of Technology in Self-Assessment and Feedback Among Hospitalist Physicians: Semistructured Interviews and Thematic Analysis.

Authors:  Andrew Lukas Yin; Pargol Gheissari; Inna Wanyin Lin; Michael Sobolev; John P Pollak; Curtis Cole; Deborah Estrin
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 5.428

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.