Alejandro López-Valenciano1, Francisco Ayala2, Francisco J Vera-García2, Mark de Ste Croix3, Sergio Hernández-Sánchez4, Iñaki Ruiz-Pérez2, Antonio Cejudo5, Fernando Santonja6. 1. Sports Research Center, Miguel Hernandez University of Elche, Elche, Spain - alejandro.lopezv@umh.es. 2. Sports Research Center, Miguel Hernandez University of Elche, Elche, Spain. 3. School of Sport and Exercise, University of Gloucestershire, Gloucester, UK. 4. Department of Pathology and Surgery, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Elche, Spain. 5. Faculty of Sports Science, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain. 6. Department of Traumatology, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Limited ranges of motion (ROM) have been considered as a primary risk factor for some football injuries, but only a few studies have analyzed differences in lower extremity joints. The main purposes were: 1) to describe the lower extremity ROM profile in professional football players; and 2) to examine differences between goalkeepers and outfield players. METHODS: Eighty-two professional male football players from 4 teams were measured in the 2013 pre-season. Measures of passive hip (flexion with knee flexed [PHFKF] and extended [PHFKE], extension [PHE], abduction [PHA], external [PHER] and internal [PHIR] rotation), knee (flexion [PKF]) and ankle (dorsiflexion with knee flexed [ADFKF] and extended [ADFKE]) ROMs were taken. Magnitude-based inferences exploring differences between player position and limb were made. RESULTS: Overall, 46% of all participants showed restricted PHFKE and/or around 30% showed restricted ADFKF ROM values. Contrarily, most players reported normal PHFKF, PHE, PHIR and PHER as well as PKF ROM scores with percentage values close to 100%. Bilateral meaningful differences for PHA, PHIR and PHER were found in approximately 30% of outfield players and goalkeepers. Statistical analysis found trivial differences between players for PHFKE, PHE, PHIR, PHER, ADFKE and ADFKF. However, moderate differences between players were found for PHFKF, PHA and PKF, with goalkeepers demonstrating higher values than outfield players. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study reinforce the necessity of prescribing exercises aimed at improving PHFKE and ADFKF ROM within everyday football training routines. In addition, as some bilateral deficits were observed, unilateral training should be considered where appropriate.
BACKGROUND: Limited ranges of motion (ROM) have been considered as a primary risk factor for some football injuries, but only a few studies have analyzed differences in lower extremity joints. The main purposes were: 1) to describe the lower extremity ROM profile in professional football players; and 2) to examine differences between goalkeepers and outfield players. METHODS: Eighty-two professional male football players from 4 teams were measured in the 2013 pre-season. Measures of passive hip (flexion with knee flexed [PHFKF] and extended [PHFKE], extension [PHE], abduction [PHA], external [PHER] and internal [PHIR] rotation), knee (flexion [PKF]) and ankle (dorsiflexion with knee flexed [ADFKF] and extended [ADFKE]) ROMs were taken. Magnitude-based inferences exploring differences between player position and limb were made. RESULTS: Overall, 46% of all participants showed restricted PHFKE and/or around 30% showed restricted ADFKF ROM values. Contrarily, most players reported normal PHFKF, PHE, PHIR and PHER as well as PKF ROM scores with percentage values close to 100%. Bilateral meaningful differences for PHA, PHIR and PHER were found in approximately 30% of outfield players and goalkeepers. Statistical analysis found trivial differences between players for PHFKE, PHE, PHIR, PHER, ADFKE and ADFKF. However, moderate differences between players were found for PHFKF, PHA and PKF, with goalkeepers demonstrating higher values than outfield players. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study reinforce the necessity of prescribing exercises aimed at improving PHFKE and ADFKF ROM within everyday football training routines. In addition, as some bilateral deficits were observed, unilateral training should be considered where appropriate.
Authors: Antonio Cejudo; Francisco Javier Robles-Palazón; Francisco Ayala; Mark De Ste Croix; Enrique Ortega-Toro; Fernando Santonja-Medina; Pilar Sainz de Baranda Journal: PeerJ Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Marta Domínguez-Díez; Daniel Castillo; Javier Raya-González; Silvia Sánchez-Díaz; María Soto-Célix; Tara Rendo-Urteaga; Ángel Lago-Rodríguez Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Antonio Cejudo; Víctor Jesús Moreno-Alcaraz; Riccardo Izzo; Francisco Javier Robles-Palazón; Pilar Sainz de Baranda; Fernando Santonja-Medina Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-09 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Antonio Cejudo; Pilar Sainz de Baranda; Francisco Ayala; Mark De Ste Croix; Fernando Santonja-Medina Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Víctor Moreno-Pérez; Gil Rodas; Marcelo Peñaranda-Moraga; Álvaro López-Samanes; Daniel Romero-Rodríguez; Per Aagaard; Juan Del Coso Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 3.390