| Literature DB >> 29087017 |
Itai Ashlagi1, Adam Bingaman2, Maximilien Burq3, Vahideh Manshadi4, David Gamarnik5, Cathi Murphey6, Alvin E Roth7, Marc L Melcher8, Michael A Rees9,10.
Abstract
Numerous kidney exchange (kidney paired donation [KPD]) registries in the United States have gradually shifted to high-frequency match-runs, raising the question of whether this harms the number of transplants. We conducted simulations using clinical data from 2 KPD registries-the Alliance for Paired Donation, which runs multihospital exchanges, and Methodist San Antonio, which runs single-center exchanges-to study how the frequency of match-runs impacts the number of transplants and the average waiting times. We simulate the options facing each of the 2 registries by repeated resampling from their historical pools of patient-donor pairs and nondirected donors, with arrival and departure rates corresponding to the historical data. We find that longer intervals between match-runs do not increase the total number of transplants, and that prioritizing highly sensitized patients is more effective than waiting longer between match-runs for transplanting highly sensitized patients. While we do not find that frequent match-runs result in fewer transplanted pairs, we do find that increasing arrival rates of new pairs improves both the fraction of transplanted pairs and waiting times.Entities:
Keywords: donors and donation: paired exchange; economics; ethics and public policy; health services and outcomes research; kidney transplantation/nephrology; organ procurement and allocation
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29087017 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14566
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Transplant ISSN: 1600-6135 Impact factor: 8.086