Literature DB >> 29086365

Noncoding RNAs in DNA Damage Response: Opportunities for Cancer Therapeutics.

Wani Arjumand1, Asia Asiaf2, Shiekh Tanveer Ahmad3.   

Abstract

DNA repair machinery preserves genomic integrity, which is frequently challenged through endogenous and exogenous toxic insults, and any sort of repair machinery malfunctioning ultimately manifests in the form of several types of terrible human diseases such as cancers (Hoeijmakers, Nature 411(6835): 366-374, 2001). Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) are crucial players of DNA repair machinery in a cell and play a vital role in maintaining genomic stability, which is essential for its survival and normal functioning thus preventing tumorigenesis. To preserve the integrity of the genome, cells initiate a specific cellular response, recognized as DNA damage response (DDR), which includes several distinct DNA repair pathways. These repair pathways permit normal cells to repair DNA damage or induce apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in case the damage is irreparable. Disruption of these pathways in cancer leads to an increase in genomic instability and mutagenesis. Recently, emerging evidence suggests that ncRNAs play a critical role in the regulation of DDR. There is an extensive crosstalk between ncRNAs and the canonical DDR signaling pathway. DDR-induced expression of ncRNAs can provide a regulatory mechanism to accurately control the expression of DNA damage responsive genes in a spatio-temporal manner. DNA damage alters expression of a variety of ncRNAs at multiple levels including transcriptional regulation, post-transcriptional regulation, and RNA degradation and vice versa, wherein ncRNAs can directly regulate cellular processes involved in DDR by altering expression of their targeting genes, with a particular emphasis on microRNAs (miRNAs) and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs). Relationship between the defects in the DDR and deregulation of related ncRNAs in human cancers is one of the established, which is growing stronger with the advent of high-throughput sequencing techniques such as next-generation sequencing. Understanding of the mechanisms that explain the association between ncRNAs and DDR/DNA repair pathways will definitely increase our understanding on human tumor biology and on different responses to diverse drugs. Different ncRNAs interact with distinct DDR components and are promising targets for improving the effects to overcome the resistance to conventional chemotherapeutic agents. In this chapter, we will focus the role of ncRNAs in the DNA damage, repair, and cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; DNA damage response; Genomic instable; MicroRNAs

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29086365     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7435-1_1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  7 in total

1.  Aging and Protein Kinases.

Authors:  Ayse Basak Engin; Atilla Engin
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Circular RNA circNIPBL promotes NNK-induced DNA damage in bronchial epithelial cells via the base excision repair pathway.

Authors:  Yufei Liu; Qiuhan Hua; Meizhen Li; Xueqi Li; Wei Chen; Huixian Zeng; Qinqin Diao; Changhong Shi; Yihui Ling; Yiguo Jiang
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 6.168

3.  Novel Non-coding RNA Analysis in Multiple Myeloma Identified Through High-Throughput Sequencing.

Authors:  Minqiu Lu; Yin Wu; Wen Gao; Ying Tian; Guorong Wang; Aijun Liu; Wenming Chen
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 4.  Redox Balance-DDR-miRNA Triangle: Relevance in Genome Stability and Stress Responses in Plants.

Authors:  Sara Cimini; Carla Gualtieri; Anca Macovei; Alma Balestrazzi; Laura De Gara; Vittoria Locato
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  LncRNA LINC01134 Contributes to Radioresistance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Regulating DNA Damage Response via MAPK Signaling Pathway.

Authors:  Zhiyi Wang; Xinxing Wang; Zhonghou Rong; Longfei Dai; Chengkun Qin; Shikang Wang; Wenmao Geng
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  A potential biomarker hsa-miR-200a-5p distinguishing between benign thyroid tumors with papillary hyperplasia and papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Xian Wang; Shan Huang; Xiaocan Li; Dongrui Jiang; Hongzhen Yu; Qiang Wu; Chaobing Gao; Zhengsheng Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  miR-27b-3p a Negative Regulator of DSB-DNA Repair.

Authors:  Ricardo I Peraza-Vega; Mahara Valverde; Emilio Rojas
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 4.096

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.