Martina Führer1, Johann Hammer2,3. 1. Abteilung für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin 3, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. 2. Abteilung für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin 3, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. johann.hammer@meduniwien.ac.at. 3. Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, 4029, Australia. johann.hammer@meduniwien.ac.at.
Abstract
Luminal capsaicin induces local and distant reflexes in the upper gastrointestinal tract and stimulates lower gastrointestinal symptoms in susceptible persons. We aimed to evaluate the effect of gastric capsaicin on rectal motor function and sensation. METHODS:Eighteen healthy volunteers participated twice, at least 1 week apart, in this double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. Participants swallowed a gastric tube for capsaicin or saline infusion. A barostat tube was placed in the rectum to measure rectal tone before and during gastric capsaicin (40 µg/ml, 2.5 ml/min) or placebo infusion and to conduct distension experiments before and after gastric infusions. Gastric infusions were terminated after 60 min or when epigastric discomfort occurred. Differences in rectal tone, compliance, and sensitivity between gastric placebo and gastric capsaicin were determined. RESULTS: On both study days, basal rectal volumes, compliance, and sensitivity parameters were comparable (NS) before gastric infusions. Gastric capsaicin infusion induced epigastric discomfort that necessitated termination of infusion after 29.6 ± 12.3 min (saline: 54.7 ± 8.9 min; p < 0.01). Rectal tone, aggregate perception scores, and rectal compliance did not differ between placebo and capsaicin trials (p > 0.05). Rectal tone increased significantly only when capsaicin induced epigastric discomfort (p < 0.05). The reproducibility of the barostat trial was acceptable with significant correlations of volumes, pressures (< 0.05; r 2 from 0.41 to 0.55), rectal compliance (p < 0.01; r 2 = 0.44), and aggregate perception scores (p values all < 0.05; r 2 from 0.44 to 0.0.65) between the two barostat trials. CONCLUSION: Gastric perfusion with capsaicin does not directly influence rectal physiology through a reflex arc.
RCT Entities:
Luminal capsaicin induces local and distant reflexes in the upper gastrointestinal tract and stimulates lower gastrointestinal symptoms in susceptible persons. We aimed to evaluate the effect of gastric capsaicin on rectal motor function and sensation. METHODS: Eighteen healthy volunteers participated twice, at least 1 week apart, in this double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. Participants swallowed a gastric tube for capsaicin or saline infusion. A barostat tube was placed in the rectum to measure rectal tone before and during gastric capsaicin (40 µg/ml, 2.5 ml/min) or placebo infusion and to conduct distension experiments before and after gastric infusions. Gastric infusions were terminated after 60 min or when epigastric discomfort occurred. Differences in rectal tone, compliance, and sensitivity between gastric placebo and gastric capsaicin were determined. RESULTS: On both study days, basal rectal volumes, compliance, and sensitivity parameters were comparable (NS) before gastric infusions. Gastric capsaicin infusion induced epigastric discomfort that necessitated termination of infusion after 29.6 ± 12.3 min (saline: 54.7 ± 8.9 min; p < 0.01). Rectal tone, aggregate perception scores, and rectal compliance did not differ between placebo and capsaicin trials (p > 0.05). Rectal tone increased significantly only when capsaicin induced epigastric discomfort (p < 0.05). The reproducibility of the barostat trial was acceptable with significant correlations of volumes, pressures (< 0.05; r 2 from 0.41 to 0.55), rectal compliance (p < 0.01; r 2 = 0.44), and aggregate perception scores (p values all < 0.05; r 2 from 0.44 to 0.0.65) between the two barostat trials. CONCLUSION: Gastric perfusion with capsaicin does not directly influence rectal physiology through a reflex arc.
Authors: S Ludidi; J M Conchillo; D Keszthelyi; C J Koning; S A Vanhoutvin; P J Lindsey; A M Leufkens; J W Kruimel; D M Jonkers; A A Masclee Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2011-11-02 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Reingard B K Rohrböck; Johann Hammer; Harald Vogelsang; Nicholas J Talley; Heinz F Hammer Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Iris Posserud; Hans Strid; Stine Störsrud; Hans Törnblom; Ulla Svensson; Jan Tack; Lukas Van Oudenhove; Magnus Simrén Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Heinz F Hammer; Mark R Fox; Jutta Keller; Silvia Salvatore; Guido Basilisco; Johann Hammer; Loris Lopetuso; Marc Benninga; Osvaldo Borrelli; Dan Dumitrascu; Bruno Hauser; Laszlo Herszenyi; Radislav Nakov; Daniel Pohl; Nikhil Thapar; Marc Sonyi Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2021-08-25 Impact factor: 4.623